枸杞面包复合改良剂优化及其品质的主成分分析法多指标评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Optimization of composite improver for Lycium barbarum bread and evaluation of its multiple quality variables
  • 作者:张怀予 ; 沈世爽 ; 张浩 ; 林勤 ; 向爱源 ; 蒲晓菊 ; 王军节
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Huaiyu;SHEN Shishuang;ZHANG Hao;Lin Qin;XIANG Aiyuan;PU Xiaoju;WANG Junjie;College of Biological and Engineering,North Minzu University;Key Laboratory of Storage and Processing of Plant Agro-Products,North Minzu University;Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Brewing Engineering and Biotechnology,State Ethnic Affairs Commission;
  • 关键词:枸杞面包 ; 响应面设计 ; 复合型改良剂 ; 品质 ; 主成分分析(PCA)
  • 英文关键词:Lycium barbarum bread;;response surface methodology;;composite improvers;;quality;;principal component analysis(PCA)
  • 中文刊名:SPFX
  • 英文刊名:Food and Fermentation Industries
  • 机构:北方民族大学生物科学与工程学院植物性农产品贮藏与加工重点实验室发酵酿造工程生物技术国家民委重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-19 09:07
  • 出版单位:食品与发酵工业
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.45;No.385
  • 基金:宁夏自然科学基金(NZ16087);; 北方民族大学重点项目(2015kj35);; 植物性农产品贮藏与加工重点实验室平台项目(2018NCPKL003)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SPFX201913035
  • 页数:10
  • CN:13
  • ISSN:11-1802/TS
  • 分类号:236-245
摘要
为探讨改良剂对枸杞面包烘焙品质的影响,通过单因素实验结合响应面设计,优化复合改良剂的最佳配方,并通过主成分分析(PCA)法对改良组枸杞面包、枸杞组和空白组面包的品质进行量化比较。结果表明,复合改良剂最佳配方:以面粉为基重,谷朊粉2. 0 g/100 g、硬脂酰乳酸钠0. 4 g/100 g、Vc 16. 4 mg/100 g、葡萄糖氧化酶19. 5 mg/100 g,且以此配方烘制的改良组面包的比容与高径比分别是空白组的1. 34和1. 11倍、枸杞组的1. 06和1. 15倍;贮藏期间改良组面包的水分散失速率、硬度上升速率都显著低于空白组与枸杞组; PCA显示,空白组与枸杞组在贮藏3 d后,其弹柔性、黏附性、面包外观、组织结构等品质开始下降,硬度和内聚性显著增加,表皮色泽变暗。改良组面包在弹性、水分含量、高径比、比容等方面具有较好的品质,且与空白组和枸杞组有明显的区分。本研究对枸杞营养面包开发具有实践指导意义。
        In order to study the effects of improvers on baking quality of Lycium barbarum bread,differences in qualities between improved Lycium barbarum bread,Lycium barbarum bread,and the blank were compared quantitatively by principal component analysis( PCA). The results showed that the optimized composite improver was based on flour and composed of 2. 0 g/100 g wheat gluten,0. 4 g/100 g sodium stearyl lactate,16. 4 mg/100 g Vc,and19. 5 mg/100 g glucose oxidase. The specific volume and the height to diameter ratio of improved bread with optimal composite improver were 1. 34 and 1. 11 times higher than the blank,and 1. 06 and 1. 15 times higher than Lycium barbarum bread,respectively. The moisture loss rate and the hardness rising rate of the improved bread during storage were significantly lower than the others. PCA indicated that the elastic flexibility,adhesiveness,bread appearance,and tissue structure etc. of the blank and Lycium barbarum bread began to decline after storing for 3 d. Additionally,their hardness and cohesiveness increased significantly,and their surface color became dark. In comparison,the improved bread had apparent better quality. This study provides practical guidance for developing nutritious Lycium barbarum bread.
引文
[1]苏宇静,贺海明,孙兆军.中国枸杞资源及其在食品工业中的应用现状和开发前景[J].食品科学,2002,23(8):292-294.
    [2]程乾斗.微生物肥料对枸杞生长发育影响的研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.
    [3]卢茁,杨宁.浅析中国人吃馒头欧洲人吃面包的原因[J].现代面粉工业,2017,31(5):9-11.
    [4]杨秀琴,邹奇波,黄卫宁.酵母菌对自然发酵酸面团面包中风味物质影响的研究[J].食品与机械,2006,22(3):37-40.
    [5]张怀予,王军节,林勤,等.枸杞面包工艺优化及其品质分析[J].食品研究与开发,2017,38(18):87-92.
    [6]杨雪飞,袁蓓蕾,罗水忠,等.品质改良剂对复合杂粮面包粉流变学特性的影响[J].食品科学,2015,36(11):75-80.
    [7]李真,董英,於来婷.大麦面包复合改良剂的优化及其对面包品质的改善作用[J].中国粮油学报,2016,31(6):117-122.
    [8]徐超宇,马晓军.面包改良剂对红薯面包面团流变特性的影响及改良剂的优化分析[J].食品工业科技,2015,36(19):267-274.
    [9]刘洋,李波,孙俊良,等.响应面法优化豆渣面包复合改良剂的研究[J].大豆科学,2012,31(6):1 007-1 012.
    [10]魏宗烽,邵颖.响应面法优化板栗面包复合改良剂的研究[J].粮食与饲料工业,2014,12(9):19-23.
    [11] SZCZESNIAK A S. Objective measurements of food texture[J]. Food Science,1963,28(4):410-420.
    [12]戴军.食品仪器分析技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006:308.
    [13]陈洁,姚晓玲,刘丹松.质构仪对面包品质改良剂效果评价的应用[J].粮食与饲料工业,2008(6):16-17.
    [14] AZID A,JUAHIR H,TORIMAN M E,et al. Prediction of the level of air pollution using principal component analysis and artificial neural network techniques:a case study in Malaysia[J]. Water Air&Soil Pollution,2014,225(8):2063.
    [15]张卓萌.基于模糊集理论的主成分分析方法研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2008.
    [16]伍婧,王远亮,李珂,等.基于主成分分析的不同醒发条件下挂面的特征质构[J].食品科学,2016,37(21):119-123.
    [17]田晓静,刘元林,蒙秋柏,等.多指标综合评价风干牛肉品质的研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(14):6-10.
    [18]唐会周,明建. 5种市售脐橙果实香气成分的主成分分析[J].食品科学,2011,32(20):175-180.
    [19]张雪波,肖世青,杜先锋,等.基于主成分分析法的安溪铁观音香气质量评价模型的构建[J].食品科学,2012,33(22):225-230.
    [20] JENSEN S,SKIBSTED L H,KIDMOSE U,et al. Addition of cassava flours in bread-making:sensory and textural evaluation[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2015,60(1):292-299.
    [21]李卓瓦,王春,陈洁.质构仪拉伸试验在面粉品质评价中的应用[J].粮食加工,2006,31(4):90-91.
    [22]王军节,努力扎提,张怀予,等.外源木聚糖酶对面包感官品质和质地的影响[J].食品科技,2011,36(12):268-271.
    [23]张园园,温白娥,卢宇,等.藜麦粉对小麦面团、面包质构特性及品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2017,43(10):197-202.
    [24] BOUREKOUA H,BENATALLAH L,ZIDOUNE M N,et al. Developing gluten free bakery improvers by hydrothermal treatment of rice and corn flours[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2016,73:342-350.
    [25] LICCIARDELLO F,GIANNONE V,DEL NOBILE M A,et al. Shelf life assessment of industrial durum wheat bread as a function of packaging system[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,224:181-190.
    [26] ALENCAR N M M,STEEL C J,ALVIM I D,et al. Addition of quinoa and amaranth flour in gluten-free breads:Temporal profile and instrumental analysis[J]. LWTFood Science and Technology,2015,62(2):1 011-1 018.
    [27]马涛.焙烤食品工艺[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007:90.
    [28]李小满.面包改良剂功能与特性的研究(Ⅱ)[J].中国食品添加剂,2001(2):23-26.
    [29] BONET A,ROSELL C M,CABALLERO P A,et al.Glucose oxidase effect on dough rheology and bread quality:A study from macroscopic to molecular level[J].Food Chemistry,2006,99(2):408-415.
    [30] HASSAN A A,EL-SHAZLY H A M,SAKR A M,et al.Influence of substituting water with fermented skim milk,acid cheese whey or Buttermilk on dough properties and baking quality of pan bread[J]. World Journal of Dairy&Food Sciences,2013,8(1):100-117.
    [31]王美萍.乳化剂在面包制作中的应用[J].中国食品,2010(14):76-78.
    [32]高红岩,张守文.硬脂酰乳酸钠对面粉品质特性及馒头品质的影响[J].食品科学,2005,26(1):84-87.
    [33] JATOI M A,JURI'CS,VIDRIH R,et al. The effects of postharvest application of lecithin to improve storage potential and quality of fresh goji(Lycium barbarum L.)berries[J]. Food chemistry,2017,230:241-249.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700