基于D-S证据理论的城市轨道交通与常规公交协调综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehensive Coordination Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit and Conventional Transit Based on D-S Evidence Theory
  • 作者:郝成 ; 殷勇
  • 英文作者:HAO Cheng;YIN Yong;School of Transportaion and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University;National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University;
  • 关键词:城市轨道交通 ; 常规公交 ; 协调评价 ; C-OWA算子 ; D-S证据理论
  • 英文关键词:Urban rail transit;;Conventional transit;;Coordination evaluation;;C-OWA operator;;D-S evidence theory
  • 中文刊名:YSZH
  • 英文刊名:China Transportation Review
  • 机构:西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院;综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20
  • 出版单位:综合运输
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YSZH201905011
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-1197/U
  • 分类号:61-66
摘要
为了科学准确地评价城市轨道交通与常规公交协调水平,提出一种基于D-S证据理论的城市轨道交通与常规公交协调评价方法。通过综合考虑城市轨道交通与常规公交协调的影响因素,从线网协调、站点协调、运营协调三个方面建立评价指标体系,引入C-OWA算子实现指标赋权,运用D-S证据理论计算各评价因素的信任区间以及评价的不确定度,借助证据融合算法对各专家的评价结果进行融合以确定协调等级,并设计算例验证了该方法的合理性与有效性。算例分析表明,基于D-S证据理论的城市轨道交通与常规公交协调评价方法能够减弱专家的主观偏好造成的不利影响,可提高了最终评价结果的可靠程度。
        In order to evaluate the coordination level of urban rail transit and conventional transit scientifically and accurately, a method of coordination evaluation of urban rail transit and conventional transit based on D-S evidence theory is proposed. Firstly, through comprehensive consideration of the influencing factors of coordination between urban rail transit and conventional transit, an evaluation index system was established from three aspects: coordination of line network, station and operation. Then, the C-OWA operator was introduced to realize the index empowerment. Then, the trust interval of each evaluation factor and the uncertainty of evaluation were calculated by using D-S evidence theory. Finally, an example was designed to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the method. The analysis shows that the coordinated evaluation method of urban rail transit and conventional transit based on D-S evidence theory can effectively reduce the adverse effects caused by the subjective preferences of experts and improve the reliability of the final evaluation results.
引文
[1]钟异莹,陈坚,邵毅明,等.基于DEA的轨道交通与常规公交换乘效率测评模型[J].计算机应用研究,2016,35(5):1446-1449.
    [2]陈坚,钟异莹,陈林,等.城市轨道交通车站内部换乘效率测评模型[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(3):577-582.
    [3]张宇石,陈旭梅,于雷,等.基于换乘站点的轨道交通与常规公交运营协调模型研究[J].铁道学报,2009,31(3):11-19.
    [4]王兵,陈钉均,徐长安,等.城市轨道交通与常规公交协调方法研究进展[J].综合运输,2017,39(12):55-59.
    [5]MD.Shoaib Chowdhuy and Steven I-Jy Chien.Optimization of Transfer Coordination for Intermodal Transit Network.Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting.January7-11.2001.Washington.D.C.
    [6]Chandra S,Quadrifoglio L.A model for estimating the optimal cycle length of demand responsive feeder transit services[J].Transportation Research Part B,2013,51(2):1-16.
    [7]Mahdi T M,Mohaymanyafshin S,GholamiAli.Designing a multimodal feeder network by covering stops with different[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2014,41(1):87-96(10).
    [8]李家斌,过秀成,王峰.轨道接运公交线路生成实用方法研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2017,15(2):41-51.
    [9]汪晖.基于郊区轨道交通新线的常规公交线网调整方法研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2017.
    [10]杨标.城市轨道交通与常规公交匹配性评价研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
    [11]谢天.城市轨道交通与公交换乘协调评价[J].铁道运输与经济,2017,39(14):119-126.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700