风险投资中的短视效应及理论解释
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Myopic Effect in Risk Investment and its Theoretical Explanations
  • 作者:江程铭 ; 董华华 ; 张文秀 ; 胡凤培
  • 英文作者:JIANG Cheng-ming;DONG Hua-hua;ZHANG Wen-xiu;HU Feng-pei;Center for Brain and Management Science,College of Economics and Management,Zhejiang University of Technology;Department of psychology,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University;
  • 关键词:短视 ; 预期理论 ; 齐当别理论 ; 损失厌恶 ; 风险厌恶
  • 英文关键词:myopic /short-run perspective,prospect theory,equate-to-differentiate theory,loss aversion,risk aversion
  • 中文刊名:YXNX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
  • 机构:浙江工业大学经贸管理学院脑科学研究中心;浙江理工大学心理学系;
  • 出版日期:2014-06-15
  • 出版单位:应用心理学
  • 年:2014
  • 期:v.20
  • 基金:国家社科基金(14BSH070);; 国家自然科学基金(71302122);; 浙江省自然科学基金(LY14C090002)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YXNX201402011
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:33-1012/B
  • 分类号:86-92
摘要
"投资者难以长远地将多重投资看作整体,而更倾向于分割成单一决策进而表现出每次决策风险规避的现象"被称为风险投资中的短视效应。短视/远视风险投资常通过单一决策/重复决策范式予以研究。大多数的研究发现,在单一决策条件下,投资者接受投资的人数比例或者投资金额低于重复决策条件。短视效应的调节机制有反馈频率、投资灵活性、选择组块、风险状况等。研究者分别提出短视损失厌恶(myopic loss aversion,简称MLA)理论和短视预期理论(myopic prospect theory,MPT)对短视现象进行解释;但这些理论受到基于齐当别理论(equate-to-differentiate theory)研究的挑战。文章在总结短视效应已有相关研究的基础上指出今后有必要深入探索的方向。
        Short-run/long-run perspectives are operated as single-play /repeated-play which makes the effect as it is. Investors tend to be less willing to accept playing gambles or investment or invest less money in singleplay conditions,compared with repeated-play conditions,which is called myopic effect. This effect could be moderated by feedback frequency,investment flexibility,choice bracketing and risk profile. Researchers have proposed several theories to explain it. The myopic loss aversion( MLA) theory combines two behavioral concepts-mental accounting and loss aversion. The myopic prospect theory( MPT) models myopic effect and reversed myopic effect. The MLA and MPT,however,are challenged by the equate-todifferentiate theory. This article first reviews research on the myopic effect and then puts forward future research directions,such as whether myopic loss aversion is the psychological mechanism that underlies myopic effect under single-play and repeated-play conditions,the neural basis of the myopic effect,and the quantitative model of the myopic effect.
引文
Bellemare,C.,Krause,M.,Krger,S.,&Zhang,C.(2005).Myopic loss aversion:Information feedback vs.investment flexibility.Economics Letters,87(3),319-324.
    Benartzi,S.,&Thaler,R.H.(1995).Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle.Economics.110(1),73-92.
    Benartzi,S.,&Thaler,R.H.(1999).Risk aversionor myopia?Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments.Management Science,45(3),364-381.
    Fellner,G.,&Sutter,M.(2009).Causes,consequences and cures of myopic loss aversion—Anexperimental investigation.The Economic Journal,119(537),900-916.
    Gneezy,U.,Kapteyn,A.,&Potters,J.(2003).Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment.Journal of Finance,58(2),821-837.
    Haigh,M.S.,&List,J.A.(2005).Do professionaltraders exhibit myopic loss aversion?An experimental analysis.The Journal of Finance,60(1),523-534.
    Haisley,E.,Mostafa,R.,&Loewenstein,G.(2008).Myopic risk-seeking:The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play.Journal ofRisk and Uncertainty,37(1),57-75.
    Kahneman,D.,&Tversky,A.(1979).Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,47(2),263-291.
    Kahneman,D.,&Tversky,A.(1984).Choices,values and frames.American Psychologist,39(4),341-350.
    Kliger,D.,&Levit,B.(2009).Evaluation periodsand asset prices:Myopic loss aversion at the financial marketplace.Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,7(2),361-371.
    Langer,T.,&Weber,M.(2001).Prospect theory,mental accounting and differences in aggregatedand segregated evaluation of lottery portfolios.Management Science,47(5),716-733.
    Langer,T.,&Weber,M.(2005).Myopic prospecttheory vs.myopic loss aversion:How general is thephenomenon.Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,56(1),25-38.
    Langer,T.,&Weber,M.(2008).Does commitmentor feedback influence myopic loss aversion?Anexperimental analysis.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,56(1),25-38.
    Li,S.(1995).Is there a decision weightπ?Journalof Economic Behavior and Organization,27(3),453-463.
    Li,S.(2003).The role of expected value illustratedin decision-making under risk:single-play vs.multiple-play.Journal of Risk Research,6(2),113-124.
    Li,S.,&Xie,X.A.(2006).New look at the“Asiandisease”problem:A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes?Thinking and Reasoning,12(2),129-143.
    Moher,E.,&Koehler,D.J.(2010).Bracketingeffects on risk tolerance:Generalizability and underlying mechanisms.Judgment and DecisionMaking,5(5),339-346.
    Read,D.,George,L.,&Matthew,R.(1997).Choice Bracketing.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.19(1),171-197.
    Samulson,P.A.(1963).Risk and uncertainty:Afallacy of large numbers.Scientia,98(4-5),108-113.
    Thaler,R.H.,Tversky,A.,Kahneman,D.,&Schwartz,A.(1997).The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking:An experimental test.Quarterly Journal of Economics,112(2),647-661.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700