面源爆破拆除工程粉尘扩散模型研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research of Dust Diffusion Model of Non-point Source Demolition Blasting
  • 作者:陶子夜 ; 舒晓春 ; 杨红刚 ; 梁开水 ; 罗静 ; 孙磐 ; 侯智 ; 余荻 ; 王慧锟
  • 英文作者:TAO Zi-ye;SHU Xiao-chun;YANG Hong-gang;LIANG Kai-shui;LUO Jing;SUN Pan;HOU Zhi;YU Di;WANG Hui-kun;Hubei Electric Engneering Corporation;Hubei Academy of Environmental Sciences;School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Wuhan University of Technology;
  • 关键词:面源 ; 爆破粉尘 ; 模型研究
  • 英文关键词:non-point source;;blasting dust;;model study
  • 中文刊名:BOPO
  • 英文刊名:Blasting
  • 机构:湖北省电力勘测设计院;湖北省环境科学研究院;武汉理工大学资源与环境工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2017-06-15
  • 出版单位:爆破
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.34;No.144
  • 基金:武汉爆破有限公司项目(611608541)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:BOPO201702027
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:42-1164/TJ
  • 分类号:147-150
摘要
为填补面源爆破拆除工程粉尘扩散模型研究领域的空白,更加科学有效地指导面源爆破拆除工程粉尘控制,在分析爆破拆除工程粉尘扩散规律的基础上,对烟团模型在x和y方向进行二维积分,建立了面源爆破拆除工程粉尘扩散模型进行研究。选择青海某火电厂整体爆破拆除工程作研究样本,在距爆破拆除对象中心200 m外每间隔30 m设一个粉尘浓度监测点位,把爆破拆除过程中粉尘的监测浓度与模型预测浓度进行对比,以验证模型。结果表明:粉尘预测浓度在距爆破中心200 m、230 m、260 m和290 m处分别为34.97 mg/m~3、21.14 mg/m~3、8.53 mg/m~3和1.91 mg/m~3,对应的粉尘监测浓度分别为23.61 mg/m~3、15.65 mg/m~3、6.56 mg/m~3和1.30 mg/m~3,粉尘的预测浓度略高于实际监测浓度,但考虑到监测值平均性和预测值瞬时性,以及实际爆破拆除工程中有效的降尘措施,面源爆破拆除工程粉尘扩散模型的预测数据与实际情况有较好的一致性。
        In order to fill the gaps in the field of non-point blasting dust diffusion model study,and to more scientifically and effectively control the non-point blasting dust,the dust diffusion model of non-point source demolition blasting was built on the basis of blasting dust diffusion law analysis and correcting the puff model in the x and y directions. Choose a explosive demolition of whole power plant in Qinghai province as research example,the dust concentration was monitored with interval of 30 m,200m away from the center of the blasting object,and comparing with the predicted values of the dust diffusion model. The results show that,relative to the predicted values were23. 91 mg/m~3( 200 m),21. 14 mg/m~3( 230 m),8. 53 mg/m~3( 260 m) and 1. 91 mg/m~3( 290 m),the corresponding monitored values were 23. 61 mg/m~3,15. 65 mg/m~3,6. 56 mg/m~3 and 1. 30 mg/m~3. The predicted values are slightly higher than the monitored. However,taking into account the monitoring of the average and predictive value of the instantaneous,and the effective dust reduction measures,the predicted values from the proposed model agreed with the measured values well.
引文
[1]杜鹏瑞,杜睿,任伟珊.城市大气颗粒物毒性效应及机制的研究进展[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(9):2815-2827.[1]DU Peng-rui,DU Rui,REN Wei-shan.Research progress on toxicological characteristics and mechanisms of urban atmospheric particulate matters[J].China Environmental Science,2016,36(9):2815-2827.(in Chinese)
    [2]杨红刚,郑敬霖,梁开水.基于Matlab GUI的爆破粉尘可视化软件设计与实现[J].爆破,2015,32(1):146-150.[2]YANG Hong-gang,ZHENG Jing-lin,LIANG Kai-shui.Design and implementation of blasting dust visualization software based on Matlab GUI[J].Blasting,2015,32(1):146-150.(in Chinese)
    [3]晋良海,罗汉,郑霞忠,等.露天梯段爆破粉尘体积分散度的分形表达[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(8):139-143.[3]JIN Liang-hai,LUO Han,ZHENG Xia-zhong,et al.Fractal expression of dust volume dispersion in bench blasting in open air[J].China Safety Science Journal,2016,26(8):139-143.(in Chinese)
    [4]刘诗源,丁晓明.西安地区PM2.5扩散预测评估[J].西南师范大学学报,2015,40(12):78-83.[4]LIU Shi-yuan,DING Xiao-ming.Prediction and evaluation of PM2.5diffusion in Xi'an area[J].Journal of Southwest China Normal University,2015,40(12):78-83.(in Chinese)
    [5]杜宗,杜华彬,段义明,等.城市核心地段钢筋混凝土内支撑爆破降尘措施[J].爆破,2016,33(3):132-135.[5]DU Zong,DU Hua-bin,DUAN Yi-ming,et al.Dust-reduction measures of explosive demolition of reinforced concrete inner supporting in urban core area[J].Blasting2016,33(3):132-135.(in Chinese)
    [6]郝吉明,马广大,王书肖.大气污染控制工程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700