摘要
利用"二重证据法"对御器厂出土的一部分不见于传世品的遗物进行梳理与分析,认为该类遗物有试制品、失败品以及绝品三种样态,并对形成原因进行了一定的讨论与推演,认为这是御器厂管厂官员与工匠在御窑体制的强大压迫下,生成的一种充满主观能动性的自我保护机制。
This paper used the "double evidence for the existence" method to sort out and analyze some of the relics found in the imperial factory yet not shown to the world. The author holds that the relics can be mainly classified into three types, namely prototypes, failed products and exquisite products. Besides,the author discussed and deduced the reasons for the formation, regarding this as a kind of self-protection mechanism full of subjective initiative which was generated by the officials and craftsmen of the Royal Factory under the big pressure of the royal kiln system.
引文
[1]权奎山.江西景德镇明清御器(窑)厂落选御用瓷器处理的考察[J].文物:2005(5):59-60.
[2]故宫博物院,景德镇市陶瓷考古研究所.明清御窑瓷器-故宫博物院与景德镇陶瓷考古新成果[M].北京:故宫出版社,2016.
[3]刘新园.明宣宗与宣德官窑.景德镇出土明宣德官窑瓷器展[M].台湾:鸿禧美术馆,1999.
[4]故宫博物院,景德镇市陶瓷考古研究所.明代宣德御窑瓷器-景德镇御窑遗址出土与故宫博物院藏传世瓷器对比[M].北京:故宫出版社,2015.
[5]故宫博物院,景德镇市陶瓷考古研究所.明代洪武永乐御窑瓷器-景德镇御窑遗址出土与故宫博物院藏传世瓷器对比[M].北京:故宫出版社,2015.
[6]江建新.中国釉上彩瓷史略[M].北京:文物出版社,2015.
[7](明)申时行.大明会典[M].卷一九四.工部一四.窑冶·陶器.明万历内府刻本.
[8](明)周梦.水部备考[M].卷六.器用.东京内阁文库.
[9](明)陆万垓.江西省大志[M].卷七.陶书.料价.万历二十五年刊本.
[10](明)明实录·神宗实录[M].卷一百六十.万历十三年四月乙卯条.台湾影印中央研究院整理本.
[11](清)(雍正)浙江通志[M].卷一六九-卷二十七.清文渊阁四库全书本.
[12](明)何三畏.云间志略[M].卷九.先别驾西野公传.明天启刻本.
[13](明)沈节甫.元明善本丛书·记录汇编[M].卷一百五十一.何孟春.余冬序录摘抄四.景明刻本.
[14]冯先铭.中国陶瓷[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001:473-474.
[15](清)唐英.陶人心语[M].卷六.瓷务事宜示谕稿序.清乾隆唐寅保刻本.
[16]霍吉淑.大英博物馆藏中国明代陶瓷[M].北京:故宫出版社,2014.