河南省入境旅游区域差异及影响因素分析
|
摘要
基于河南省入境旅游2008-2017年数据,运用标准差、变异系数、基尼系数、首位度、空间集中度指数和位序分布等方法,对河南省入境旅游的区域发展差异进行分析,并运用相关系数法探析影响河南省入境旅游区域发展差异的影响因素。发现:(1)河南省入境旅游规模绝对差异一直增大,相对差异先减小后增大,且2011年相对差异最小;(1)河南省入境旅游区域差异极不均衡,洛阳、郑州和焦作三市占据入境旅游总人数的2/3以上,洛阳市对郑州、焦作和开封三市具有明显的规模优势;(3)旅游资源禀赋和区位条件对河南入境旅游区域差异具有普遍性,剔除郑州市,河南省入境旅游区域差异与旅游资源禀赋、对外经济、旅游设施、区位条件和经济发展水平都显著相关。
Based on the data of inbound tourism in Henan Province from 2008 to 2017,analyze the regional development differences of inbound tourism in Henan Province with the methods of standard deviation,coefficient of variation,Gini coefficient,primacy,spatial concentration index and rank distribution,use correlation coefficient to explore the influencing factors of regional development differences. It is found that:( 1) The absolute difference of inbound tourism in Henan Province has been increasing,while the relative difference is the smallest in 2011,and increases after.( 2) The regional differences are extremely uneven: Luoyang,Zhengzhou and Jiaozuo accounts more than two thirds of the total number of inbound tourism. Obviously,Luoyang has more scale advantages than Zhengzhou,Jiaozuo and Kaifeng.( 3) Tourism resources endowment and location conditions are universal to the regional differences of inbound tourism in Henan. Excluding Zhengzhou,the regional differences are significantly related to tourism resources endowment,foreign economy,tourism facilities,location conditions and economic development level.
Based on the data of inbound tourism in Henan Province from 2008 to 2017,analyze the regional development differences of inbound tourism in Henan Province with the methods of standard deviation,coefficient of variation,Gini coefficient,primacy,spatial concentration index and rank distribution,use correlation coefficient to explore the influencing factors of regional development differences. It is found that:( 1) The absolute difference of inbound tourism in Henan Province has been increasing,while the relative difference is the smallest in 2011,and increases after.( 2) The regional differences are extremely uneven: Luoyang,Zhengzhou and Jiaozuo accounts more than two thirds of the total number of inbound tourism. Obviously,Luoyang has more scale advantages than Zhengzhou,Jiaozuo and Kaifeng.( 3) Tourism resources endowment and location conditions are universal to the regional differences of inbound tourism in Henan. Excluding Zhengzhou,the regional differences are significantly related to tourism resources endowment,foreign economy,tourism facilities,location conditions and economic development level.
引文
[1]王凯,易静,李皓.中国入境旅游发展的时空差异演变分析:1991—2010[J].人文地理,2014,29(1):134-140.
[2]宣国富.中国入境旅游规模结构的省际差异及影响因素[J].经济地理,2012,32(11):156-161.
[3]李旭,秦耀辰,宁晓菊,张丽君.中国入境游客旅游目的地选择特征及变化[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1 635-1 644.
[4]赵东喜.中国省际入境旅游发展影响因素研究———基于分省面板数据分析[J].旅游学刊,2010,1(23):41-45.
[5]万绪才,王厚廷,傅朝霞.中国城市入境旅游发展差异及其影响因素[J].地理研究,2013,32(2):337-346.
[6]吴良平,张健.中国入境客流区域集散的结构差异与转移规律研究[J].旅游科学,2017,31(6):14-29.
[7]陈微微.河南省入境旅游市场时空演变规律研究[J].资源开发与市场,2011,27(10):890-893.
[8]李晶,孙根年.河北城市入境旅游极化与国内旅游扁平化[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(9):1 109-1 113.
[9]袁利,孙根年.四川省入境旅游规模差异时空演化及其成因分析[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版),2018,32(3):156-164+177.
[10]姚云霞,管卫华,李在军.江苏省入境旅游流的时空演变及影响因素分析[J].旅游科学,2016,30(5):52-62.
[2]宣国富.中国入境旅游规模结构的省际差异及影响因素[J].经济地理,2012,32(11):156-161.
[3]李旭,秦耀辰,宁晓菊,张丽君.中国入境游客旅游目的地选择特征及变化[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1 635-1 644.
[4]赵东喜.中国省际入境旅游发展影响因素研究———基于分省面板数据分析[J].旅游学刊,2010,1(23):41-45.
[5]万绪才,王厚廷,傅朝霞.中国城市入境旅游发展差异及其影响因素[J].地理研究,2013,32(2):337-346.
[6]吴良平,张健.中国入境客流区域集散的结构差异与转移规律研究[J].旅游科学,2017,31(6):14-29.
[7]陈微微.河南省入境旅游市场时空演变规律研究[J].资源开发与市场,2011,27(10):890-893.
[8]李晶,孙根年.河北城市入境旅游极化与国内旅游扁平化[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(9):1 109-1 113.
[9]袁利,孙根年.四川省入境旅游规模差异时空演化及其成因分析[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版),2018,32(3):156-164+177.
[10]姚云霞,管卫华,李在军.江苏省入境旅游流的时空演变及影响因素分析[J].旅游科学,2016,30(5):52-62.