基于“三生”视角的煤粮复合区土地利用功能评价
|
摘要
[目的]以河南省新乡市赵固二矿煤粮复合区为典型案例区,对该区土地利用多功能性进行研究,为其区域功能发展提供支撑。[方法]基于研究时序统计年鉴等基础数据,从"三生"功能(生产功能、生活功能、生态功能)角度择选出符合不同子功能的15个指标因子,构建出适用于煤粮复合区的评价指标体系。运用全排列多边形综合图示法对研究区2009—2015年间土地利用功能演变进行量化评价。[结果](1)全排列多边形综合图示法评价结果直观、准确、涉及面广且主观随意性低,适用于区域土地利用功能评价;(2)单项指标显示,2009—2015年间,各子功能的指标偏向侧重度均有所改变,但其主导障碍因子稳定不变;(3)7a间,研究区均以生产功能作为区域主导功能,受区域煤炭开采影响土地集约利用综合指数以2012年为分界点总体先增加后减少,变化速率为快—缓—快。[结论]煤炭开采活动对煤粮复合区土地功能利用有重要影响,区域土地"三生"功能变化及区域土地集约利用程度与区域煤炭事业的发展变化联系紧密。
[Objective]Taking areas of cropland and coal resources as a case study to research land use function in order to provide support for the development of regional function.[Methods]From productionliving-ecology aspects,15 indexes with different function were selected to construct a suitable evaluation index system in study area.Based on the established index system,the land use function was evaluated quantitatively using entire-array-polygon indictor method from 2009 to 2015.[Results](1) The entirearray-polygon indictor method used in this study was intuitionistic,accurate,widely involved and low subjective.It could be applied to evaluate regional land use function.(2) The single index showed that the indexes of each subsystem tended to change slightly,but the dominant obstacle factor remained stable in 2009—2015.(3) Within the 7 years,the production function was the regional leading function in the study area.Due to the regional impact of coal mining,cut-off point of intensive land use comprehensive index occurred in 2012,and showed an increasing trend initially and then decreased.[Conclusion]Coal mining activities have a significant impact on land use in the areas of cropland and coal resources,and the level of regional land function change and land intensive use is close related to the development and change of regional coal industry.
[Objective]Taking areas of cropland and coal resources as a case study to research land use function in order to provide support for the development of regional function.[Methods]From productionliving-ecology aspects,15 indexes with different function were selected to construct a suitable evaluation index system in study area.Based on the established index system,the land use function was evaluated quantitatively using entire-array-polygon indictor method from 2009 to 2015.[Results](1) The entirearray-polygon indictor method used in this study was intuitionistic,accurate,widely involved and low subjective.It could be applied to evaluate regional land use function.(2) The single index showed that the indexes of each subsystem tended to change slightly,but the dominant obstacle factor remained stable in 2009—2015.(3) Within the 7 years,the production function was the regional leading function in the study area.Due to the regional impact of coal mining,cut-off point of intensive land use comprehensive index occurred in 2012,and showed an increasing trend initially and then decreased.[Conclusion]Coal mining activities have a significant impact on land use in the areas of cropland and coal resources,and the level of regional land function change and land intensive use is close related to the development and change of regional coal industry.
引文
[1]OECD.Multifunctionality:Towards an Analytical Framework[M].Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,2001.
[2]Reidsma P,K9nig H,Feng S,et al.Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries[J].Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):604-617.
[3]de Groot R.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use confli cts in planning for sustainable,multi-functional landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,75(3/4):175-186.
[4]Scher B,Helming K,Wiggering H.Assessing land use change impacts:A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J].Journal of Land Use Science,2010,5(2):159-178.
[5]Helming K,Diehl K,Kuhlman T,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use(part A):Analytical framework[J/OL].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):27.https:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art27/
[6]Helming K,Diehl K,Kuhlman T,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use(part B):Application of the analytical framework[J/OL].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):29.https:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art29/.
[7]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[8]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
[9]Wiggering H,Dalchow C,Glemnitz M,et al.Indic ators for multifunctional land use-linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials[J].Ecological Indicator,2006,6(1):238-249.
[10]Reidsma P,Knig H,Feng S,et al.Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries[J].Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):604-617.
[11]程龙,董捷.基于全排列多边形综合图示指标法的武汉城市圈土地集约利用评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):183-187.
[12]杨树海.城市土地集约利用的内涵及其评价指标体系构建[J].经济问题探索,2007(1):27-30.
[13]陈银蓉,梅昀,王传明,等.城市土地集约利用的研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2006,23(5):7-12.
[14]陈莹,刘康,郑伟元,等.城市土地集约利用潜力评价的应用研究[J].中国土地科学,2002,,616(4):26-29.
[15]王伟华.基于主成分分析法的城市土地利用集约度研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:社会科学版,2005,7(4):448-450.
[16]黎一畅,周寅康,吴林,等.城市土地集约利用的空间差异研究:以江苏省为例[J].南京大学学报:自然科学版,2006,42(3):309-315.
[17]曹银贵,周伟,王静,等.基于主成分分析与层次分析的三峡库区耕地集约利用对比[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):291-296.
[18]薛俊菲,邱道持,卫欣,等.小城镇土地集约利用水平综合评价探讨:以重庆市北碚区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2002(4):46-50.
[19]汪波,郑家响.我国大城市土地集约利用评价研究[J].北京科技大学学报:社会科学版,2006,22(1):24-28.
[20]陈海燕,李闽.江苏省城市土地利用集约评价及区域分异特征[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(5):61-65.
[21]宋吉涛,方创琳,宋吉强,等.大都市边缘区乡镇土地集约利用与增长方式转变评价指标体系研究:以北京市海淀区北部新区4镇为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(4):170-178.
[22]刘力,邱道持,粟辉,等.城市土地集约利用评价[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,29(5):887-890.
[23]韦中亚,周贵云,罗万勤.一种基于数学形态学的沟壑密度提取算法[J].地理学与国土研究,2001,17(2):24-27.
[24]周伟,曹银贵,乔陆印.基于全排列多边形图示指标法的西宁市土地集约利用评价[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(4):84-90.
[25]饶清华,邱宇,许丽忠,等.基于多目标决策的节能减排绩效评估[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(2):617-625.
[26]王洪威,徐建刚,桂昆鹏,等.城市绿地系统生态服务效能评价及优化研究:以淮安生态新城为例[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(4):1018-1024.
[2]Reidsma P,K9nig H,Feng S,et al.Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries[J].Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):604-617.
[3]de Groot R.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use confli cts in planning for sustainable,multi-functional landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,75(3/4):175-186.
[4]Scher B,Helming K,Wiggering H.Assessing land use change impacts:A comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks[J].Journal of Land Use Science,2010,5(2):159-178.
[5]Helming K,Diehl K,Kuhlman T,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use(part A):Analytical framework[J/OL].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):27.https:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art27/
[6]Helming K,Diehl K,Kuhlman T,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use(part B):Application of the analytical framework[J/OL].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):29.https:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art29/.
[7]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[8]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
[9]Wiggering H,Dalchow C,Glemnitz M,et al.Indic ators for multifunctional land use-linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials[J].Ecological Indicator,2006,6(1):238-249.
[10]Reidsma P,Knig H,Feng S,et al.Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries[J].Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):604-617.
[11]程龙,董捷.基于全排列多边形综合图示指标法的武汉城市圈土地集约利用评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):183-187.
[12]杨树海.城市土地集约利用的内涵及其评价指标体系构建[J].经济问题探索,2007(1):27-30.
[13]陈银蓉,梅昀,王传明,等.城市土地集约利用的研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2006,23(5):7-12.
[14]陈莹,刘康,郑伟元,等.城市土地集约利用潜力评价的应用研究[J].中国土地科学,2002,,616(4):26-29.
[15]王伟华.基于主成分分析法的城市土地利用集约度研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:社会科学版,2005,7(4):448-450.
[16]黎一畅,周寅康,吴林,等.城市土地集约利用的空间差异研究:以江苏省为例[J].南京大学学报:自然科学版,2006,42(3):309-315.
[17]曹银贵,周伟,王静,等.基于主成分分析与层次分析的三峡库区耕地集约利用对比[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):291-296.
[18]薛俊菲,邱道持,卫欣,等.小城镇土地集约利用水平综合评价探讨:以重庆市北碚区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2002(4):46-50.
[19]汪波,郑家响.我国大城市土地集约利用评价研究[J].北京科技大学学报:社会科学版,2006,22(1):24-28.
[20]陈海燕,李闽.江苏省城市土地利用集约评价及区域分异特征[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(5):61-65.
[21]宋吉涛,方创琳,宋吉强,等.大都市边缘区乡镇土地集约利用与增长方式转变评价指标体系研究:以北京市海淀区北部新区4镇为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(4):170-178.
[22]刘力,邱道持,粟辉,等.城市土地集约利用评价[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,29(5):887-890.
[23]韦中亚,周贵云,罗万勤.一种基于数学形态学的沟壑密度提取算法[J].地理学与国土研究,2001,17(2):24-27.
[24]周伟,曹银贵,乔陆印.基于全排列多边形图示指标法的西宁市土地集约利用评价[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(4):84-90.
[25]饶清华,邱宇,许丽忠,等.基于多目标决策的节能减排绩效评估[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(2):617-625.
[26]王洪威,徐建刚,桂昆鹏,等.城市绿地系统生态服务效能评价及优化研究:以淮安生态新城为例[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(4):1018-1024.