三层聚乙烯防腐涂层和双层熔结环氧粉末涂层性能对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Performance Comparison of 3PE and DPS in Protective Coatings
  • 作者:凌志成 ; 代孟元 ; 周正发 ; 徐卫兵
  • 英文作者:Ling Zhicheng;Dai Mengyuan;Zhou Zhengfa;Xu Weibing;School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;Axalta Huajia Coatings ( Huangshan) Co.,Ltd.;
  • 关键词:防腐涂层 ; 三层聚乙烯 ; 双层熔结环氧粉末
  • 英文关键词:anticorrosive coating;;three-layer polyethylene;;dual powder fusion bonded epoxy systems
  • 中文刊名:TLGY
  • 英文刊名:Paint & Coatings Industry
  • 机构:合肥工业大学化学与化工学院;艾仕得华佳涂料(黄山)有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2017-01-01
  • 出版单位:涂料工业
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.47;No.391
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TLGY201701012
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:32-1154/TQ
  • 分类号:73-77
摘要
分析了三层聚乙烯防腐涂层(3PE)和双层熔结环氧粉末涂层(DPS)的结构,对比了2种涂层的耐划伤性能、弹性模量、喷涂与质量控制、补口补伤安全性、阴极保护相容性与经济性以及其他性能,指出了3PE的缺陷和DPS的优势。并对DPS和3PE涂层进行了综合评价,指出DPS完全可以替代现有的3PE防护体系,满足实际应用的需要。
        The basic performance and composition of both three-layer polyethylene anticorrosive coating( 3PE) and dual powder fusion bonded epoxy systems( DPS),especially their abrasion resistant,elastic modulus,spray process and quality control,pipeline gap coating-repair & security,cathodic protective compatibility and economy were compared in detail.The result showed that DPS,as a substitution of the existing 3PE in China,was superior to3 PE in overall protective performance capable of meeting requirement in actual application.
引文
[1]韩文礼,林竹,申强,等.管道涂层防腐蚀技术的现状与展望[J].石油工程建设,2003,29(2):1-4.
    [2]杨赫,刘彦礼.近年我国油气管道防腐技术的应用[J].化学工程师,2008,149(2):28-31.
    [3]赵君,罗鹏,滕延平,等.管道三层PE防腐层现场应用调查与分析[J].管道技术与设备,2008(6):41-43.
    [4]COLIN J ARGENT,DAVID NORMAN.Fitness for purpose issues relating to FBE and three layer PE coatings[C].Houston:Corrosion,2005.
    [5]杜秀玲,吴希革,李楠.浅谈埋地钢质管道阴极保护对3PE涂层的影响[J].腐蚀与防护,2007,28(5):249-252.
    [6]杨晓鸿.天然气管道双层熔结环氧粉末防腐体系的应用[J].油气储运,2005,24(1):43-47.
    [7]ERNEST W,KLECHKAJR.Dual-powder FBE coatings used for directionally drilled Alaskan river crossings[J].Coatings&Linings,2003,42(6):38-42.
    [8]龚树鸣.三层PE在中国的应用[J].防腐保温技术,2004,4(4):11-13.
    [9]廖宇平,程书旗,郑玉海,等.管道3PE防护层的结构特点与缺陷分析及防范[J].腐蚀与防护,2006,27(6):311-314.
    [10]毕学振.熔结环氧粉末涂料[J].防腐保温技术,2006,14(3):22-26.
    [11]冯庆善.双层环氧粉末覆盖层应用可行性研究[J].油气储运,2001,20(2):35-39.
    [12]胡士信.国内管道防腐层技术现状及差距[J].防腐保温技术,2005,13(1):1-6.
    [13]杜秀玲,吴希革,李楠.浅谈埋地钢质管道阴极保护对熔结环氧粉末涂层的影响[J].防腐保温技术,2007,15(1):21-25.
    [14]NORSWORTHY R,NORSWORTHY R.Fusion bonded epoxy-a field proven fail safe coating system[J].Corrosion,2006:3-8.
    [15]FENG Q S,YANG Z P.The use of a dual powder system as an external pipeline coating[J].Corrosion,2004,(4-8):04173.
    [16]廖宇平,程书旗,郑玉海,等.3PE防腐层缺陷成因分析与防范[J].防腐保温技术,2005,13(3):26-30.
    [17]李远利,雍歧卫,刘志.管道防腐涂层新发展[J].涂料工业,2007,37(2):55-57.
    [18]NEAL D.Pipeline coating failure-not always what you think it is[J].Corrosion,2000,(2-4):00755.
    [19]MOORE D P.Cathodic shielding can be a major problem after a coating fails[J].Materials Performance,2000,39(4):44-49.
    [20]BEAVERS J A,THOMPSON N G.Corrosion beneath disbonded pipeline coatings[J].Materials Performance,1997,36(4):13-19.
    [21]胡士信,董旭.我国管道防腐层技术现状[J].油气储运,2004,23(7):4-8.
    [22]DENNIS NEAL.Two coating systems contend for premium spot in the market[J].Pipe Line&Gas Industry.1998,3(4):3-5.
    [23]张柏松,王丽.管道多层覆盖层系统的评价[J].油气储运,2001,20(6):23-25.
    [24]NORMAN D,ARGENT C.Pipeline coatings,external corrosion and direct assessment[J].Corrosion,2007,(4-10):07154.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700