网络嵌入、双元创新能力构筑与后发企业创新追赶
|
摘要
通过网络获取创新需要的知识和信息,是后发企业实现创新追赶的重要选择。文章从理论分析出发,构筑了网络嵌入-双元创新能力-创新追赶绩效的关系模型,进而通过实证分析进行验证。本研究发现:外部知识网络嵌入形态通过影响内部双元创新能力,进而作用于后发企业的创新追赶绩效,其中关系强度、关系持久度、网络规模和网络位置中心度对后发企业利用性创新能力具有显著正向影响,网络中心度对探索性创新能力具有显著正向影响,而探索性创新能力和利用性创新能力则对创新追赶绩效具有显著正向影响。因此,后发企业在进行创新追赶过程中,需要注重优化企业外部的网络形态,来有效提升企业内部创新能力和更好地实现追赶。
The knowledge and information needed for innovation through the network are important resources for latecomers to achieve innovation. Based on the theoretical analysis,this paper constructs a theoretical model of network embedding,dual-innovation capability and catch-up performance,and then verifies it through empirical analysis. The study finds that the external knowledge network embedded form affects the internal dual-innovation capability,and then acts on the innovative performance of the latecomers,in which the relationship strength,relationship persistence,network scale and network location center degree have significantly positive impacts on the exploitation of latecomers. Network centrality has a significant positive impact on exploration,while exploitation and exploration capability have significant positive impacts on catch-up performance. Therefore,in the process of improve innovation capacities,the latecomers need to focus on optimizing the network forms outside the enterprise to effectively improve the internal innovation capabilities and better catch up.
The knowledge and information needed for innovation through the network are important resources for latecomers to achieve innovation. Based on the theoretical analysis,this paper constructs a theoretical model of network embedding,dual-innovation capability and catch-up performance,and then verifies it through empirical analysis. The study finds that the external knowledge network embedded form affects the internal dual-innovation capability,and then acts on the innovative performance of the latecomers,in which the relationship strength,relationship persistence,network scale and network location center degree have significantly positive impacts on the exploitation of latecomers. Network centrality has a significant positive impact on exploration,while exploitation and exploration capability have significant positive impacts on catch-up performance. Therefore,in the process of improve innovation capacities,the latecomers need to focus on optimizing the network forms outside the enterprise to effectively improve the internal innovation capabilities and better catch up.
引文
[1]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.转型经济中后发企业的创新能力追赶路径:国有企业和民营企业的双城故事[J].管理世界,2011(12):96-115.
[2]吴晓波,张好雨.从二次创新到超越追赶_中国高技术企业创新能力的跃迁[J].社会科学战线,2018(10):85-91.
[3]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.转型经济背景下后发企业的能力追赶---一个共演模型[J].管理世界,2011(04):122-137.
[4]刘洋,魏江,江诗松.后发企业如何进行创新追赶-研发网络边界拓展的视角[J].管理世界,2013(03):96-110.
[5]Ying L,Vanhaverbeke W,Schoenmakers W.Exploration and exploitation in innovation:reframing the interpretation[J].Creativity and Innovation Management,2008,17(02):107-126.
[6]向永胜,魏江,郑小勇.多重嵌入对集群企业创新能力的作用研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(10):102-111.
[7]任胜钢,吴娟,王龙伟.网络嵌入与企业创新绩效研究---网络能力的调节效应检验[J].研究与发展管理,2011,23(03):16-24.
[8]Jansen J J P,Bosch F A J V D,Volberda H W.Exploratory innovation,exploitative innovation,and performance:effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J].Management Science,2006,52(11):1661-1674.
[9]向永胜,古家军.网络结构嵌入、吸收能力与集群企业双元创新能力---基于内外整合视角的实证[J].企业经济,2017(04):66-72.
[10]魏江,向永胜.文化嵌入与集群发展的共演机制研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2012,28(03):114-118+103.
[11]Liao S H,Fei W C,Chen C C.Knowledge sharing,absorptive capacity,and innovation capability[J].Journal of Information Science,2007,33(3):340-359.
[12]Hansen M T.The search-transfer problem:the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(01):82-111.
[13]Uzzi B.Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(01):35-67.
[14]Rowley T,Behrens D,Krackhardt D.Redundant governance structures:an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(03):369.
[15]Tsai K H.Collaborative networks and product innovation performance:toward a contingency perspective[J].Research Policy,2009,38:765-778.
[16]Charles Dhanaraj M A L,Kevin Steensma H,Laszlo Tihanyi.Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs:the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35(05):428-442.
[17]魏江,郑小勇.关系嵌入强度对企业技术创新绩效的影响机制研究---基于组织学习能力的中介性调节效应分析[J].浙江大学学报,2010,40(06):168-180.
[18]蔡宁,潘松挺.网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化---以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2008(04):137-144.
[19]彭新敏.企业网络与利用性-探索性学习的关系研究---基于创新视角[J].科研管理,2011,32(03):15-22.
[20]Kristinsson K,Rao R.Interactive learning or technology transfer as a way to catch-up?Analysing the wind energy industry in denmark and india[J].Industry&Innovation,2008(06):297-320.
[21]Bill McEvily A Z.Bridging ties:a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133.
[22]胡保亮,方刚.网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究---基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):18-26.
[23]Akbar Zaheer G G B.Benefiting from network position:firm capabilities,structural holes,and performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(09):809-825.
[24]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.后发企业能力追赶研究探析与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2013,34(03):57-64+71.
[25]李强.技术创新、行业特征与制造业追赶绩效[J].科学学研究,2016,34(02):312-320.
[26]刘洋,应瑛,魏江,等.研发网络边界拓展、知识基与创新追赶[J].科学学研究,2015,33(06):915-923.
[27]Dhewanto W,Prasetio E A,Ratnaningtyas S,et al.Moderating effect of cluster on firm’s innovation capability and business performance:a conceptual framework[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012,65:867-872.
[28]Zhou K Z,Wu F.Technological capability,strategic flexibility,and product innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(05):547-561.
[29]Grtner T.Exploration,exploitation,and innovative performance:analysis of medium,small,and micro firms[J].2009.
[30]吴俊杰.企业家社会网络、双元性创新与技术创新绩效[D].浙江:浙江工商大学,2013.
[31]Moran P.Structural vs.relational embeddedness:social capital and managerial performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(12):1129-1151.
[2]吴晓波,张好雨.从二次创新到超越追赶_中国高技术企业创新能力的跃迁[J].社会科学战线,2018(10):85-91.
[3]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.转型经济背景下后发企业的能力追赶---一个共演模型[J].管理世界,2011(04):122-137.
[4]刘洋,魏江,江诗松.后发企业如何进行创新追赶-研发网络边界拓展的视角[J].管理世界,2013(03):96-110.
[5]Ying L,Vanhaverbeke W,Schoenmakers W.Exploration and exploitation in innovation:reframing the interpretation[J].Creativity and Innovation Management,2008,17(02):107-126.
[6]向永胜,魏江,郑小勇.多重嵌入对集群企业创新能力的作用研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(10):102-111.
[7]任胜钢,吴娟,王龙伟.网络嵌入与企业创新绩效研究---网络能力的调节效应检验[J].研究与发展管理,2011,23(03):16-24.
[8]Jansen J J P,Bosch F A J V D,Volberda H W.Exploratory innovation,exploitative innovation,and performance:effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J].Management Science,2006,52(11):1661-1674.
[9]向永胜,古家军.网络结构嵌入、吸收能力与集群企业双元创新能力---基于内外整合视角的实证[J].企业经济,2017(04):66-72.
[10]魏江,向永胜.文化嵌入与集群发展的共演机制研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2012,28(03):114-118+103.
[11]Liao S H,Fei W C,Chen C C.Knowledge sharing,absorptive capacity,and innovation capability[J].Journal of Information Science,2007,33(3):340-359.
[12]Hansen M T.The search-transfer problem:the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(01):82-111.
[13]Uzzi B.Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(01):35-67.
[14]Rowley T,Behrens D,Krackhardt D.Redundant governance structures:an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(03):369.
[15]Tsai K H.Collaborative networks and product innovation performance:toward a contingency perspective[J].Research Policy,2009,38:765-778.
[16]Charles Dhanaraj M A L,Kevin Steensma H,Laszlo Tihanyi.Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs:the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35(05):428-442.
[17]魏江,郑小勇.关系嵌入强度对企业技术创新绩效的影响机制研究---基于组织学习能力的中介性调节效应分析[J].浙江大学学报,2010,40(06):168-180.
[18]蔡宁,潘松挺.网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化---以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2008(04):137-144.
[19]彭新敏.企业网络与利用性-探索性学习的关系研究---基于创新视角[J].科研管理,2011,32(03):15-22.
[20]Kristinsson K,Rao R.Interactive learning or technology transfer as a way to catch-up?Analysing the wind energy industry in denmark and india[J].Industry&Innovation,2008(06):297-320.
[21]Bill McEvily A Z.Bridging ties:a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133.
[22]胡保亮,方刚.网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究---基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):18-26.
[23]Akbar Zaheer G G B.Benefiting from network position:firm capabilities,structural holes,and performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(09):809-825.
[24]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.后发企业能力追赶研究探析与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2013,34(03):57-64+71.
[25]李强.技术创新、行业特征与制造业追赶绩效[J].科学学研究,2016,34(02):312-320.
[26]刘洋,应瑛,魏江,等.研发网络边界拓展、知识基与创新追赶[J].科学学研究,2015,33(06):915-923.
[27]Dhewanto W,Prasetio E A,Ratnaningtyas S,et al.Moderating effect of cluster on firm’s innovation capability and business performance:a conceptual framework[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012,65:867-872.
[28]Zhou K Z,Wu F.Technological capability,strategic flexibility,and product innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(05):547-561.
[29]Grtner T.Exploration,exploitation,and innovative performance:analysis of medium,small,and micro firms[J].2009.
[30]吴俊杰.企业家社会网络、双元性创新与技术创新绩效[D].浙江:浙江工商大学,2013.
[31]Moran P.Structural vs.relational embeddedness:social capital and managerial performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(12):1129-1151.