不同锥度牙胶垂直加压根管充填术在牙源性上颌骨囊肿疼痛伴感染患者中的临床应用观察
|
摘要
目的探讨不同锥度牙胶垂直加压根管充填术在牙源性上颌骨囊肿疼痛伴感染患者中的临床应用效果。方法选取2015年9月至2017年8月于我院于我院行牙胶垂直加压根管充填术治疗的牙源性上颌骨囊肿疼痛伴感染患者100例,随机分为A组和B组各50例。A组采用0.02锥度牙胶尖行热牙胶垂直加压充填术, B组采用0.06锥度牙胶尖行热牙胶垂直加压充填术,比较两组的根管充填情况、治疗效果及根管充填时间。结果 B组的治疗有效率为96.00%,显著高于A组的84.00%(P <0.05)。B组的根管充填时间显著短于A组(P <0.05)。结论大锥度牙胶垂直加压根管充填术治疗牙源性上颌骨囊肿疼痛伴感染患者,效果较好,根管充填情况满意,患者术后恢复好,同时还能显著缩短治疗时间,提高医生工作效率,减轻医患双方疲劳程度。
Objective To explore the clinical application effect of different conical degrees of gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection. Methods 100 cases of patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection undergoing gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in our hospital from September 2015 to August 2017 were selected and randomly divided into group A and group B, with 50 cases in each group. Group A was given the 0.02 conical degree of gutta-percha point for thermal gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling, while group B was given the 0.06 conical degree of gutta-percha point. The root canal filling condition, treatment effect and root canal filling time were compared between the two groups.Results The effective rate of treatment of group B was 96.00%, significantly higher than 84.00% of group A(P <0.05). The root canal filling time of group B was significantly shorter than that of group A(P <0.05). Conclusions Large conical degree of gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection has better effect and satisfying root canal filling condition with good postoperative recovery, which can significantly shorten the treatment time, and improve the efficiency of doctors and reduce the fatigue of both doctors and patients.
Objective To explore the clinical application effect of different conical degrees of gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection. Methods 100 cases of patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection undergoing gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in our hospital from September 2015 to August 2017 were selected and randomly divided into group A and group B, with 50 cases in each group. Group A was given the 0.02 conical degree of gutta-percha point for thermal gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling, while group B was given the 0.06 conical degree of gutta-percha point. The root canal filling condition, treatment effect and root canal filling time were compared between the two groups.Results The effective rate of treatment of group B was 96.00%, significantly higher than 84.00% of group A(P <0.05). The root canal filling time of group B was significantly shorter than that of group A(P <0.05). Conclusions Large conical degree of gutta-percha vertical compression root canal filling in patients with odontogenic maxillary cyst pain and infection has better effect and satisfying root canal filling condition with good postoperative recovery, which can significantly shorten the treatment time, and improve the efficiency of doctors and reduce the fatigue of both doctors and patients.
引文
[1]丁晓琳.颌骨囊肿边缘受累活髓牙存留对颌骨囊肿治疗效果的影响[J].医学理论与实践, 2015, 28(21):2962-2963, 2970.
[2]格根塔娜,金武龙.热牙胶垂直加压根管充填技术用于颌骨大型囊肿术前根管治疗的临床观察[J].内蒙古医科大学学报, 2014, 36(2):125-128.
[3]张建霞.不同锥度牙胶尖冷侧方加压充填磨牙根管的临床疗效分析[J].中外医疗, 2013, 32(24):15-17.
[4]蒋磊,吕新海.两种锥度牙胶尖加压充填上颌第一磨牙根管的效果比较[J].实用医药杂志, 2015, 11(5):439-440.
[5]路丽,郭立华,韩燕,等.不同锥度牙胶尖根管充填的根尖封闭性研究[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2015, 13(3):138-141.
[6]何爱娥,汪春仙,高婵.两种热牙胶垂直加压法进行根管充填的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(7):429-431.
[7]谭小尧,张兴安,罗智宇,等.保存受累牙的大型颌骨囊肿摘除术65例临床观察[J].口腔医学, 2014, 34(5):396-397.
[8]司玲,牛东岳,王新君.评价热牙胶垂直加压充填技术用于根管治疗的临床效果[J].航空航天医学杂志, 2014, 25(1):58-59.
[9]张楠,申海,刘金明.热牙胶垂直加压充填技术对根尖封闭性能的研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2015, 36(31):4689-4690.
[10]李冬霞,李颖,王苏豫.热牙胶垂直加压与冷牙胶侧压法充填根管的致密度研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2015, 25(4):234-237.
[11]刘宇,冯炼,孙华.不同锥度牙胶垂直加压用于颌骨囊肿术前根管治疗的比较[J].黑龙江医药, 2017, 30(3):666-668.
[2]格根塔娜,金武龙.热牙胶垂直加压根管充填技术用于颌骨大型囊肿术前根管治疗的临床观察[J].内蒙古医科大学学报, 2014, 36(2):125-128.
[3]张建霞.不同锥度牙胶尖冷侧方加压充填磨牙根管的临床疗效分析[J].中外医疗, 2013, 32(24):15-17.
[4]蒋磊,吕新海.两种锥度牙胶尖加压充填上颌第一磨牙根管的效果比较[J].实用医药杂志, 2015, 11(5):439-440.
[5]路丽,郭立华,韩燕,等.不同锥度牙胶尖根管充填的根尖封闭性研究[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2015, 13(3):138-141.
[6]何爱娥,汪春仙,高婵.两种热牙胶垂直加压法进行根管充填的临床疗效观察[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(7):429-431.
[7]谭小尧,张兴安,罗智宇,等.保存受累牙的大型颌骨囊肿摘除术65例临床观察[J].口腔医学, 2014, 34(5):396-397.
[8]司玲,牛东岳,王新君.评价热牙胶垂直加压充填技术用于根管治疗的临床效果[J].航空航天医学杂志, 2014, 25(1):58-59.
[9]张楠,申海,刘金明.热牙胶垂直加压充填技术对根尖封闭性能的研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2015, 36(31):4689-4690.
[10]李冬霞,李颖,王苏豫.热牙胶垂直加压与冷牙胶侧压法充填根管的致密度研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2015, 25(4):234-237.
[11]刘宇,冯炼,孙华.不同锥度牙胶垂直加压用于颌骨囊肿术前根管治疗的比较[J].黑龙江医药, 2017, 30(3):666-668.