上海市杨浦区老年人休闲体育活动与生活质量相关性研究
|
摘要
目的:了解杨浦区老年人休闲活动、生活质量现状以及相关性,以期为杨浦区的体育理论研究与发展实践提供参考。方法:以文献资料法、问卷调查法、访谈法、比较分析法为主要研究方法,以SPSS21.0为主要统计软件,对上海市杨浦区老年人休闲体育活动及其与生活质量关系进行分析。结果:有近九成的老年人参加过休闲体育锻炼,然而锻炼缺乏主动和有效组织,休闲场地、设施不足,锻炼组老人心理健康自评P值<0.05。结论:锻炼组老人在躯体功能维度、心理功能维度、社会功能维度及物质生活功能维度等方面均处于较高水平,特别体现在身体健康状况、心理健康状况和社会功能三方面,老年人休闲体育活动及其与生活质量在某些方面相关。
Objective: To understand the leisure activities and quality of life of seniors in Yangpu District,Shanghai and their correlations,in order to provide references for the theoretical research and development of sports in Yangpu District. Methods: The literature research method,questionnaire survey method,interview method and comparative analysis method were used as main research methods. With SPSS21. 0 as the main statistical software,the leisure sports activities and their relationship with the quality of life of the elderly in Shanghai Yangpu District were analyzed. Results: Nearly 90% of the elderly had participated in leisure sports. However,lack of active and effective training,lack of leisure venues and facilities,and self-assessment of psychological health of the exercise group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: The old people in the exercise group are at a relatively high level in terms of physical function,psychological function,social function,and material life function,especially in physical health,mental health,and social function. Activities and their relevance to quality of life are in some ways.
Objective: To understand the leisure activities and quality of life of seniors in Yangpu District,Shanghai and their correlations,in order to provide references for the theoretical research and development of sports in Yangpu District. Methods: The literature research method,questionnaire survey method,interview method and comparative analysis method were used as main research methods. With SPSS21. 0 as the main statistical software,the leisure sports activities and their relationship with the quality of life of the elderly in Shanghai Yangpu District were analyzed. Results: Nearly 90% of the elderly had participated in leisure sports. However,lack of active and effective training,lack of leisure venues and facilities,and self-assessment of psychological health of the exercise group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: The old people in the exercise group are at a relatively high level in terms of physical function,psychological function,social function,and material life function,especially in physical health,mental health,and social function. Activities and their relevance to quality of life are in some ways.
引文
[1]温秋宁.休闲体育与老年人生活质量关系研究[D].江西:江西师范大学,2014:3-5.
[2]Shin DC,Johnson DM.Avowed Happiness as An Overall Assessment of The Quality of Life.Social Indicators–earch,1978,5:475-492.
[3]潘飞.河北省城市老年人休闲体育与幸福指数的相关研究[D].湖南:湖南科技大学,2015:10-15.
[4]张卫平.休闲体育与老年人生活质量关系研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2014:8-11.
[5]Hagerty,M.R.,Cummins,R.A.,Ferris,A.L.,L and,K.C.,Michalos,A.C.,Peterson,M.,etal.Quality of life indexes for national policy:Review and a genda for research.Social Indicators Research,2011,55:1-96.
[6]Harada,M.:Japan,in G.Cushman,A.J.Veal and J.Zuzanek(eds.).Free Time and Leisure Participation:International Perspectives.CABI Publishing,Cambridge,MA,2006:153-162.
[7]Osborne,S.The quality dimension.Evaluating quality of service and quality of life in human services.British Journal of Social Work,2012,22:437-453.
[8]Mercer C L.Assessing live ability:From statistical indicators to policy benchmarks,in:C.Mercer(ed.),Urban and Regional Quality of Life Indicators,Institute for Cultural Policy Studies.Griffith University,Brisbane,2013:3-12.
[9]Kathleen M,Lloyd,Christopher J,Auld.The role of leisure in determining quality of life:issues of content and measurement.Social Indictors Research,2012,(57):43-71.
[10]郑元男,元英信,曹星.休闲教育视角下休闲体育参加者的流畅感、满意度与幸福感研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2016,01:102-111.
[11]李晶,王文军,顾怀婷,刘根义,张璟.济宁市社区老年人休闲体育活动与抑郁、生存质量的关系[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2016,08:817-820.
[12]屈宏强.我国休闲体育研究的理论困境及对策建议[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2014,02:81-84.
[2]Shin DC,Johnson DM.Avowed Happiness as An Overall Assessment of The Quality of Life.Social Indicators–earch,1978,5:475-492.
[3]潘飞.河北省城市老年人休闲体育与幸福指数的相关研究[D].湖南:湖南科技大学,2015:10-15.
[4]张卫平.休闲体育与老年人生活质量关系研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2014:8-11.
[5]Hagerty,M.R.,Cummins,R.A.,Ferris,A.L.,L and,K.C.,Michalos,A.C.,Peterson,M.,etal.Quality of life indexes for national policy:Review and a genda for research.Social Indicators Research,2011,55:1-96.
[6]Harada,M.:Japan,in G.Cushman,A.J.Veal and J.Zuzanek(eds.).Free Time and Leisure Participation:International Perspectives.CABI Publishing,Cambridge,MA,2006:153-162.
[7]Osborne,S.The quality dimension.Evaluating quality of service and quality of life in human services.British Journal of Social Work,2012,22:437-453.
[8]Mercer C L.Assessing live ability:From statistical indicators to policy benchmarks,in:C.Mercer(ed.),Urban and Regional Quality of Life Indicators,Institute for Cultural Policy Studies.Griffith University,Brisbane,2013:3-12.
[9]Kathleen M,Lloyd,Christopher J,Auld.The role of leisure in determining quality of life:issues of content and measurement.Social Indictors Research,2012,(57):43-71.
[10]郑元男,元英信,曹星.休闲教育视角下休闲体育参加者的流畅感、满意度与幸福感研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2016,01:102-111.
[11]李晶,王文军,顾怀婷,刘根义,张璟.济宁市社区老年人休闲体育活动与抑郁、生存质量的关系[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2016,08:817-820.
[12]屈宏强.我国休闲体育研究的理论困境及对策建议[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2014,02:81-84.