摘要
研究AP1000非能动余热排出系统可靠性,应用重要度和敏感性指标全面详细地分析系统设备可靠性,得到导致系统失效的设备各种失效模式的重要度和敏感性排序结果;整合了系统设备可靠性与物理过程可靠性,将整体可靠性融合进概率安全评价模型。分析结果表明:研究非能动余热排出系统可靠性时不仅需要分析其设备可靠性,还应该重点考虑系统物理过程可靠性,应整合两种可靠性并将系统整体可靠性融合进概率安全评价模型,综合分析非能动余热排出系统可靠性。
The paper studied the reliability of AP1000 passive residual heat removal system, and various importance and sensibility index were used to analyze the hardware reliability of the system. Importance and sensibility order for various failure mode of equipment leading to system failure is obtained to provide references to optimize the system and improve the hardware reliability. The hardware and physical process reliability of the system is integrated into the probabilistic safety assessment. The result was found that the evaluation of the reliability of the passive residual heat removal system not only analyzed the hardware reliability but also considered the physical process reliability, and the hardware and physical process reliability should be integrated into the probabilistic safety assessment to evaluate the passive residual heat removal system reliability comprehensively.
引文
[1]周涛,李精精.核电机组非能动技术的应用及其发展[J].中国电机工程学报,2013,33(8):81-89.
[2]Personal communication with G.L[R].Fiorini,CEA,France,2004.
[3]IAEA.Progress in methodologies for the assessment of passive safety system reliability in advanced reactors[R].2014.TECDOC-1752.
[4]钱晓明.AP1000非能动余热排出系统可靠性分析及地震安全评价[D].保定:华北电力大学,2013.
[5]黄昌蕃.非能动安全系统可靠性评估方法初步研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2012.
[6]孙汉虹,程平东,繆鸿兴,等.第三代核电技术AP1000(第二版)[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2016.
[7]林诚格.非能动安全先进压水堆核电技术(第一版)[M].北京:原子能出版社,2010.
[8]Westinghouse AP1000 design control document(DCD),tier 2,chapter 5:reactor coolant system and connected system,revision 19[R].Westinghouse electric company,2011.
[9]依岩,李娟,黄志超.运行核电厂PSA设备可靠性数据采集与处理[M].北京:中国原子能出版社,2015.
[10]Kirchsteriger C,Bolado R.Best links between PSA and passive safety systems reliability[R].JRC Report,Petten.2004.