贪污贿赂犯罪特别从宽条款的适用研究
|
摘要
《刑法修正案(九)》中贪污贿赂犯罪特别从宽条款的增设,作为立法者酌定量刑情节法定化的制度性尝试,对于推动案件进程、节约司法资源具有一定的进步意义。可是令人遗憾的是,学界对其设置必要性与妥当性的争论,并未在随后出台的司法解释中得到权威阐述,实践中部分操作难点仍缺乏明确的司法判断准则。现阶段的当务之急在于细化从宽处罚的规则设计,进而在有效配置刑罚强度让案件办理有据可依的同时,赋予法官适度的自由裁量空间,实现罪责刑相适应基础上的公平正义。
"Criminal law amendment(nine)" additional crimes of corruption and bribery especially lenient terms, as legislators system of statutory discretion of sentencing attempt to promote the process of the case, save the judicial resources has certain progressive significance. But unfortunately, the academic setting necessity and appropriateness of the debate has not been described in the authority of judicial interpretation of the subsequent introduction, the practice part of operation difficulty is still a lack of clear standards of judicial judgment. This stage is a pressing matter of the moment design refinement rules of lenient punishment, and punishment in the effective allocation of the intensity of the cases handled according to at the same time, giving judges the discretion of the appropriate implementation of suiting punishment on the basis of fairness and justice.
"Criminal law amendment(nine)" additional crimes of corruption and bribery especially lenient terms, as legislators system of statutory discretion of sentencing attempt to promote the process of the case, save the judicial resources has certain progressive significance. But unfortunately, the academic setting necessity and appropriateness of the debate has not been described in the authority of judicial interpretation of the subsequent introduction, the practice part of operation difficulty is still a lack of clear standards of judicial judgment. This stage is a pressing matter of the moment design refinement rules of lenient punishment, and punishment in the effective allocation of the intensity of the cases handled according to at the same time, giving judges the discretion of the appropriate implementation of suiting punishment on the basis of fairness and justice.
引文
[1]张兆松.论《刑法修正案(九)》对贪污贿赂犯罪的十大重大修改和完善[J].法治研究,2016(2):88-99.
[2]卢建平,朱贺.酌定量刑情节法定化的路径选择及评析——以我国《刑法》第383条第3款为例[J].政治与法律,2016(3):2-9.
[3]梁根林.贪污受贿定罪量刑标准的立法完善[J].中国法律评论,2015(2):162-167.
[4]欧阳本祺.论《刑法》第383条之修正[J].当代法学,2016(1):12-20.
[5]赖早兴.贪污贿赂犯罪规定修正述评——基于《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)(草案)》的思考[J].学习论坛,2015(4):74-77.
[6]闫雨.当代中国贪污贿赂犯罪刑法完善探讨——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》为基点[J].江西科技师范大学学报,2015(4):67-73.
[7]王刚.我国贪污贿赂犯罪之特别宽宥制度的适用研究[J].绥化学院学报,2017(3):42-45.
[8]刘宪权.贪污贿赂犯罪最新定罪量刑标准体系化评析[J].法学,2016(5):79-92.
[9]赵秉志.贪污贿赂犯罪定罪量刑标准问题研究[J].中国法学,2015(1):25-47.
[10]张远煌,彭德才.贪污贿赂犯罪特别从宽处罚制度价值分析——以司法机关办案数据为基础[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):83-89.
[2]卢建平,朱贺.酌定量刑情节法定化的路径选择及评析——以我国《刑法》第383条第3款为例[J].政治与法律,2016(3):2-9.
[3]梁根林.贪污受贿定罪量刑标准的立法完善[J].中国法律评论,2015(2):162-167.
[4]欧阳本祺.论《刑法》第383条之修正[J].当代法学,2016(1):12-20.
[5]赖早兴.贪污贿赂犯罪规定修正述评——基于《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)(草案)》的思考[J].学习论坛,2015(4):74-77.
[6]闫雨.当代中国贪污贿赂犯罪刑法完善探讨——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》为基点[J].江西科技师范大学学报,2015(4):67-73.
[7]王刚.我国贪污贿赂犯罪之特别宽宥制度的适用研究[J].绥化学院学报,2017(3):42-45.
[8]刘宪权.贪污贿赂犯罪最新定罪量刑标准体系化评析[J].法学,2016(5):79-92.
[9]赵秉志.贪污贿赂犯罪定罪量刑标准问题研究[J].中国法学,2015(1):25-47.
[10]张远煌,彭德才.贪污贿赂犯罪特别从宽处罚制度价值分析——以司法机关办案数据为基础[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):83-89.