摘要
通过比较《中国文献编目规则(第二版)》电子资源和ISBD (ER)、ISBD (统一版)在著录信息源、题名与责任说明项、版本项、出版发行项、载体形态项、丛编项、附注项、标准编号与获得方式项的内容,发现《中国文献编目规则(第二版)》电子资源著录方式存在一些不足。
By comparing description methods of electronic resources among Chinese Cataloging Rules(2 nd Edition), International Standard Bibliographic Description(ISBD)(Electronic Resources) and International Standard Bibliographic Description(ISBD)(Unified Edition) in aspects of cataloging information source, statement of title and responsible author,edition items, publication and distribution items, physical description items, series items, annotation items, standard number items and acquisition ways, the paper finds that there are some shortcomings in the electronic resources description of Chinese Cataloging Rules(2 nd Edition).
引文
[1]国家图书馆《中国文献编目规则》修订组.中国文献编目规则(第二版)[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2005.
[2] IFLAISBDReview Group.ISBD(ER):International Standard Bibliographic Description for Electronic Resources[EB/OL].[2018-06-19].https://www.ifla.org.
[3] IFLAISBDReview Group.International Standard Bibliographic Description Consolidated Edition.2011.[EB/OL].[2018-06-19].https://www.ifla.org.