低碳时代基于进化博弈的中国环境影响评价市场机制探究
|
摘要
从微观角度引入进化博弈论,分析环评市场中利益双方即"企业—环评机构"在进化博弈中的稳定策略,结果表明完善中国环评市场机制可以从两方面入手:一是增加"犯罪"成本,加强执法打击力度,客观上迫使双方放弃行贿受贿等犯罪机会;二是降低履约成本,提高社会收益,主观上增加企业助力环保低碳社会建设的自觉性和能动性。
At present,most of the studies on eia focus on the macro perspective or the summary of the existing eia system abroad without micro objectivity and pertinence. From microscopic point of view,using the evolutionary game theory,the stable strategy of the two stakeholders,namely "enterprise-eia agency",in the eia market was analyzed. The results show that there are two ways to improve the eia market mechanism in China: first,both sides should give up bribery and other crimes objectively by increasing the cost of"crime"and strengthening law enforcement; second,the consciousness and initiative of enterprises to help the construction of environmental protection and low-carbon society should be increased subjectively by reducing the cost of performance and improving social benefits.
At present,most of the studies on eia focus on the macro perspective or the summary of the existing eia system abroad without micro objectivity and pertinence. From microscopic point of view,using the evolutionary game theory,the stable strategy of the two stakeholders,namely "enterprise-eia agency",in the eia market was analyzed. The results show that there are two ways to improve the eia market mechanism in China: first,both sides should give up bribery and other crimes objectively by increasing the cost of"crime"and strengthening law enforcement; second,the consciousness and initiative of enterprises to help the construction of environmental protection and low-carbon society should be increased subjectively by reducing the cost of performance and improving social benefits.
引文
[1] ZHAO Z,CHANG R,ZILLANTE G. Challenges for China’s energy conservation and emission reduction[J].Energy Policy,2014,74:709-713.
[2]王生生.环评乱象[J].中国经济周刊,2014(3):24-33.
[3]周磊,王怡美.“未批先建”项目环境影响评价探讨[J].绿色科技,2016(8):84-86.
[4]孙钰,李鑫.环评机构体制改革在探索中全面推进[J].环境影响评价,2014(6):22-23.
[5]王亚虹,宋文斌.环境影响评价现状监测管理存在问题及对策研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(5):1-4.
[6]中国环境保护产业协会环境影响评价分会.中国环境影响评价行业2012年发展综述[J].中国环保产业,2013(4):19-22.
[7]张国兴,高秀林.中国节能减排政策措施的有效性研究[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(5):45-50.
[8]汪劲.环境影响评价程序之公众参与问题研究:兼论中国《环境影响评价法》相关规定的施行[J].法学评论,2004(2):107-118.
[9]杨英杰.公众参与环境评价的有效性探讨[J].城市建设理论研究:电子版,2013(21).
[10]其其格.关于对中国环境影响评价制度问题的思考[J].环境与发展,2012,27(5):23-25.
[11]肖强,王海龙.环境影响评价公众参与的现行法制度设计评析[J].法学杂志,2015,36(12):60-70.
[12]李醒.加拿大环境影响评价程序及对中国的启示[J].比较法研究,2013(5):138-144.
[13]邓大跃,李楠,戴涟漪.国外战略环境影响评价制度的借鉴意义[J]. Advances in Environmental Protection,2015,5(4):76-81.
[14]陈军辉,叶宏,任勇.瑞典的战略环境影响评价制度及中国的借鉴[J].环境保护,2008(17):75-77.
[15]MAYNARD S J. Evolution and the theory of games[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
[16]谢予识.经济博弈论[M].第三版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2011.
[17]蒋燕敏.项目环评审批制度深化改革探讨[J].污染防治技术,2016(1):49-51.
[18]王静.规划环境影响评价指标体系及评价方法探讨[J].资源节约与环保,2013(8):93-93.
[2]王生生.环评乱象[J].中国经济周刊,2014(3):24-33.
[3]周磊,王怡美.“未批先建”项目环境影响评价探讨[J].绿色科技,2016(8):84-86.
[4]孙钰,李鑫.环评机构体制改革在探索中全面推进[J].环境影响评价,2014(6):22-23.
[5]王亚虹,宋文斌.环境影响评价现状监测管理存在问题及对策研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(5):1-4.
[6]中国环境保护产业协会环境影响评价分会.中国环境影响评价行业2012年发展综述[J].中国环保产业,2013(4):19-22.
[7]张国兴,高秀林.中国节能减排政策措施的有效性研究[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(5):45-50.
[8]汪劲.环境影响评价程序之公众参与问题研究:兼论中国《环境影响评价法》相关规定的施行[J].法学评论,2004(2):107-118.
[9]杨英杰.公众参与环境评价的有效性探讨[J].城市建设理论研究:电子版,2013(21).
[10]其其格.关于对中国环境影响评价制度问题的思考[J].环境与发展,2012,27(5):23-25.
[11]肖强,王海龙.环境影响评价公众参与的现行法制度设计评析[J].法学杂志,2015,36(12):60-70.
[12]李醒.加拿大环境影响评价程序及对中国的启示[J].比较法研究,2013(5):138-144.
[13]邓大跃,李楠,戴涟漪.国外战略环境影响评价制度的借鉴意义[J]. Advances in Environmental Protection,2015,5(4):76-81.
[14]陈军辉,叶宏,任勇.瑞典的战略环境影响评价制度及中国的借鉴[J].环境保护,2008(17):75-77.
[15]MAYNARD S J. Evolution and the theory of games[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
[16]谢予识.经济博弈论[M].第三版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2011.
[17]蒋燕敏.项目环评审批制度深化改革探讨[J].污染防治技术,2016(1):49-51.
[18]王静.规划环境影响评价指标体系及评价方法探讨[J].资源节约与环保,2013(8):93-93.