湖南省土地多功能耦合协调度时空分异
|
摘要
研究目的:测度和分析湖南省土地"三生"功能之间的耦合协调时空特征,为提升土地整体利用效益提供参考。研究方法:综合指数模型、耦合协调度模型。研究结果:(1)2005—2015年,湖南省土地生态功能值高于生活和生产功能,土地生产、生活功能强度提高且呈现非均衡性特征,生态功能值小幅降低,但空间格局变化不明显;(2)2005年、2010年、2015年三期土地功能耦合协调度的均值分别为0.486、0.581和0.620,表明近10年来湖南省土地利用冲突趋于减弱。土地功能耦合协调度空间分布上形成以长株潭3+5城市群为高值区的中心—外围结构,不同主体功能区耦合协调度分值由高到低的顺序依次为:农产品主产区>重点开发区>重点生态功能区;(3)影响土地功能耦合协调的因素包括宏观政策、经济发展和自然资源禀赋等。研究结论:应根据土地多功能的时空耦合特征和影响因素,制定差异化的调控策略以提升土地"三生"功能。
The purpose of this paper is to measure and analyze coupling interaction between regional land use multifunctions(LUMF), and to provide a reference for improving the overall land use effectiveness. The methods used include comprehensive index model and coupling coordination model. The results shows as follows: 1)during the study period, the value of land use ecological function in Hunan Province was higher than the values of living and production functions; and the values of production and living functions significantly increased and showed unbalanced characteristics. Ecological function slightly decreased, and the spatial pattern change was not obvious. 2)In the past ten years, LUMF coupling coordination degree gradually increased, which were 0.486, 0.581 and 0.620, respectively. It showed a decreasing pattern of land use conflict degree. The spatial distribution of land coupling coordination degree formed a center-periphery structure with the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan 3+5 urban agglomeration as the highvalue core. In different major function orientated zones(MFOZ), the order from high to low was Grain Production Zone,Key Development Zone and Ecological Function Zone. 3)The factors affecting the LUMF coupling coordination degree included macro policy, economic development and natural resources endowment. In conclusion, according to the spatialtemporal coupling characteristics and influencing factors of LUMF, different strategies should formulated to enhance the LUMF.
The purpose of this paper is to measure and analyze coupling interaction between regional land use multifunctions(LUMF), and to provide a reference for improving the overall land use effectiveness. The methods used include comprehensive index model and coupling coordination model. The results shows as follows: 1)during the study period, the value of land use ecological function in Hunan Province was higher than the values of living and production functions; and the values of production and living functions significantly increased and showed unbalanced characteristics. Ecological function slightly decreased, and the spatial pattern change was not obvious. 2)In the past ten years, LUMF coupling coordination degree gradually increased, which were 0.486, 0.581 and 0.620, respectively. It showed a decreasing pattern of land use conflict degree. The spatial distribution of land coupling coordination degree formed a center-periphery structure with the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan 3+5 urban agglomeration as the highvalue core. In different major function orientated zones(MFOZ), the order from high to low was Grain Production Zone,Key Development Zone and Ecological Function Zone. 3)The factors affecting the LUMF coupling coordination degree included macro policy, economic development and natural resources endowment. In conclusion, according to the spatialtemporal coupling characteristics and influencing factors of LUMF, different strategies should formulated to enhance the LUMF.
引文
[1]叶玉瑶,苏泳娴,张虹鸥,等.生态阻力面模型构建及其在城市扩展模拟中的应用[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):485-496.
[2]LIU T,LIU H,QI Y.Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China:insights from national land surveys,1996-2006[J].Habitat International,2015,46:13-22.
[3]崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[4]张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[5]杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应--以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.
[6]DE GROOT R.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable,multifunctional landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,75(3-4):175-186.
[7]HELMING K,DIEHL K,BACH H,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use,part a:analytical framework[J].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):271.
[8]PARACCHINI M L,PACINI C,JONES M L M,et al.An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J].Ecological Indicators,2011,11(1):71-80.
[9]DENG X Z,LI Z H,GIBSON J A.A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(7):953-968.
[10]陈睿山,蔡运龙,严祥,等.土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):8-15.
[11]甄霖,曹淑艳,魏云洁,等.土地空间多功能利用:理论框架及实证研究[J].资源科学,2009,31(4):544-551.
[12]张路路,郑新奇,原智远,等.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的唐山市土地利用多功能性评价[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(6):69-78.
[13]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究--以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[14]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断--以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
[15]陈影,许皞,陈亚恒,等.基于遥感影像的县域土地功能分类及功能转换分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(13):263-272.
[16]甄霖,魏云洁,谢高地,等.中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6749-6761.
[17]李广东,方创琳.城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[18]尤南山,蒙吉军,李枫,等.1980-2017年中国土地资源学发展研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(11):4-15.
[19]宋小青.土地多功能利用与土地利用转型发展[J].土地科学动态,2018(4):13-15.
[20]金巨刚,周生路,张燕,等.江苏省土地利用协调性空间差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):250-254.
[21]ZHOU,XU J,LIN Z.Conflict or coordination?Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-livingecology analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,577:136-147.
[22]任志远,徐茜,杨忍.基于耦合模型的陕西省农业生态环境与经济协调发展研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(12):14-19.
[23]TANG Z.An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment[J].Tourism Management,2015,46:11-19.
[24]姜磊,柏玲,吴玉鸣.中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析--兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(5):788-799.
[25]孔伟,任亮,王淑佳,等.河北省生态环境与经济协调发展的时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2941-2949.
[26]熊建新,陈端吕,彭保发,等.洞庭湖区生态承载力系统耦合协调度时空分异[J].地理科学,2014,34(9):1108-1116.
[27]中华人民共和国统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2016.
[28]湖南省统计局.湖南省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2016.
[29]KATES R W,CLARK W C,CORELL R.Sustainability science[J].Science,2001,292:641-642.
[30]杜国明,孙晓兵,王介勇.东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(2):232-244.
[31]张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[32]杜焱.旅游产业发展潜力的测度与评价--以湖南省为例[J].经济地理,2014,34(6):176-181.
[33]刘中艳,罗琼.省域城市旅游竞争力测度与评价--以湖南省为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(4):186-192.
[34]刘永强,廖柳文,龙花楼,等.土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析--以湖南省为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(4):691-700.
[35]湖南红网.湖南省等级旅游景区名单[EB/OL].(2016-02-24)[2017-10-01].http://tour.rednet.cn/c/2016/02/24/3917000.htm.
[36]刘超,许月卿,孙丕苓,等.土地利用多功能性研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1087-1099.
(1)本文将《湖南省主体功能区规划》中的国家级重点开发区和省级重点开发区统一为重点开发区。
[2]LIU T,LIU H,QI Y.Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China:insights from national land surveys,1996-2006[J].Habitat International,2015,46:13-22.
[3]崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[4]张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[5]杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应--以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.
[6]DE GROOT R.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable,multifunctional landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,75(3-4):175-186.
[7]HELMING K,DIEHL K,BACH H,et al.Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use,part a:analytical framework[J].Ecology and Society,2011,16(1):271.
[8]PARACCHINI M L,PACINI C,JONES M L M,et al.An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J].Ecological Indicators,2011,11(1):71-80.
[9]DENG X Z,LI Z H,GIBSON J A.A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(7):953-968.
[10]陈睿山,蔡运龙,严祥,等.土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):8-15.
[11]甄霖,曹淑艳,魏云洁,等.土地空间多功能利用:理论框架及实证研究[J].资源科学,2009,31(4):544-551.
[12]张路路,郑新奇,原智远,等.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的唐山市土地利用多功能性评价[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(6):69-78.
[13]梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究--以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[14]王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断--以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
[15]陈影,许皞,陈亚恒,等.基于遥感影像的县域土地功能分类及功能转换分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(13):263-272.
[16]甄霖,魏云洁,谢高地,等.中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6749-6761.
[17]李广东,方创琳.城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[18]尤南山,蒙吉军,李枫,等.1980-2017年中国土地资源学发展研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(11):4-15.
[19]宋小青.土地多功能利用与土地利用转型发展[J].土地科学动态,2018(4):13-15.
[20]金巨刚,周生路,张燕,等.江苏省土地利用协调性空间差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):250-254.
[21]ZHOU,XU J,LIN Z.Conflict or coordination?Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-livingecology analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,577:136-147.
[22]任志远,徐茜,杨忍.基于耦合模型的陕西省农业生态环境与经济协调发展研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(12):14-19.
[23]TANG Z.An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment[J].Tourism Management,2015,46:11-19.
[24]姜磊,柏玲,吴玉鸣.中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析--兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(5):788-799.
[25]孔伟,任亮,王淑佳,等.河北省生态环境与经济协调发展的时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2941-2949.
[26]熊建新,陈端吕,彭保发,等.洞庭湖区生态承载力系统耦合协调度时空分异[J].地理科学,2014,34(9):1108-1116.
[27]中华人民共和国统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2016.
[28]湖南省统计局.湖南省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2016.
[29]KATES R W,CLARK W C,CORELL R.Sustainability science[J].Science,2001,292:641-642.
[30]杜国明,孙晓兵,王介勇.东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(2):232-244.
[31]张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[32]杜焱.旅游产业发展潜力的测度与评价--以湖南省为例[J].经济地理,2014,34(6):176-181.
[33]刘中艳,罗琼.省域城市旅游竞争力测度与评价--以湖南省为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(4):186-192.
[34]刘永强,廖柳文,龙花楼,等.土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析--以湖南省为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(4):691-700.
[35]湖南红网.湖南省等级旅游景区名单[EB/OL].(2016-02-24)[2017-10-01].http://tour.rednet.cn/c/2016/02/24/3917000.htm.
[36]刘超,许月卿,孙丕苓,等.土地利用多功能性研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1087-1099.
(1)本文将《湖南省主体功能区规划》中的国家级重点开发区和省级重点开发区统一为重点开发区。