摘要
In view of their advantage in long-pulse high-performance operations, low internal inductance scenarios are being developed and tested for the EAST and other tokamaks. Dependence of the internal inductance on several main plasma configuration parameters are statistically analyzed. It is found that the internal inductance of the plasma is closely related to the radial distance dR_(sep) between the primary and secondary X-point surfaces on the outer mid-plane as well as the poloidal field of the last closed flux surface. Moreover, dRsepis also related to the distribution of the fast electrons driven by the injected lower-hybrid waves, which is partially responsible for the observed relation between dR_(sep) and the internal inductance. The results here should therefore be helpful as a guide for future experiments on internal inductance control and long-pulse operations of the EAST and other tokamaks, as well as for detailed theoretical study of the underlying physics.
In view of their advantage in long-pulse high-performance operations, low internal inductance scenarios are being developed and tested for the EAST and other tokamaks. Dependence of the internal inductance on several main plasma configuration parameters are statistically analyzed. It is found that the internal inductance of the plasma is closely related to the radial distance dR_(sep) between the primary and secondary X-point surfaces on the outer mid-plane as well as the poloidal field of the last closed flux surface. Moreover, dRsepis also related to the distribution of the fast electrons driven by the injected lower-hybrid waves, which is partially responsible for the observed relation between dR_(sep) and the internal inductance. The results here should therefore be helpful as a guide for future experiments on internal inductance control and long-pulse operations of the EAST and other tokamaks, as well as for detailed theoretical study of the underlying physics.
引文
[1] Kamada Y et al 1993 Nucl. Fusion 33 225
[2] Lao L L et al 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 3435
[3] The JET Team 1997 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39 B353
[4] Turco F and Luce T C 2010 Nucl. Fusion 50 095010
[5] Aiba N and Urano H 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 114007
[6] Connor J W et al 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 R1
[7] Najmabadi F et al 2006 Fusion Eng. Des. 80 3
[8] Sauter O et al 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 1654
[9] Strait E J et al 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 2483
[10] Garofalo A M et al 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 056110
[11] Wan B N et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 104011
[12] Wan B N et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 104006
[13] Li J et al 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 817
[14] Lao L L et al 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611
[15] Qian J P et al 2009 Plasma Sci. Technol. 11 142
[16] Ridolfini V P et al 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 93
[17] Wang T F et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 054502