基层公务员政策执行力对政务诚信行为的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Influence of Grass-roots Civil Servants' Policy Execution to the Honest Behavior of Government Affairs
  • 作者:陈永进 ; 张晓娟
  • 英文作者:Chen Yongjin;Zhang Xiaojuan;
  • 关键词:基层公务员 ; 政策执行力 ; 政务诚信行为
  • 英文关键词:grassroots civil servants;;policy executive ability;;government affairs integrity behavior
  • 中文刊名:XZYF
  • 英文刊名:Administration and Law
  • 机构:重庆大学公共管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-20
  • 出版单位:行政与法
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.246
  • 基金:重庆市社会科学规划项目“心理学视野下的政务诚信建设研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:2015YBSH045
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XZYF201902010
  • 页数:10
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:22-1235/D
  • 分类号:64-73
摘要
在政策执行过程中,政策执行力、政务诚信行为均会影响政策效果。本文在对重庆市基层公务员进行问卷调查的基础上,分析了政策执行力对政务诚信行为的影响。研究结果表明:基层公务员政策执行力、政务诚信行为总体上处于较高、较好水平。当人口统计变量作为自变量时,公务员年龄越大,政务诚信行为、工作导向政务诚信行为得分越高;行政级别越高,公众导向政务诚信行为得分越高;工作导向政务诚信行为得分男性明显低于女性。当人口统计变量作为控制变量时,政策执行力及子维度均正向影响政务诚信行为及工作导向政务诚信行为;政策理解力、政策落实力对群众导向政务诚信行为有显著正向影响,而政策意志力对其影响不明显。
        In the process of policy implementation,both policy executive ability and government affairs integrity behavior influence the effectiveness of the policy.This paper conducts a questionnaire survey of 328 grassroots civil servants,and studies the relationship between policy executive ability and government affairs integrity behavior.The results show that:Firstly,policy executive ability and government affairs integrity behavior of grassroots civil servants are generally at a relatively high level. Secondly,when the demographic variable is an independent variable,the older the civil servant,the higher the total score of its government affairs integrity behavior and the higher the score of work-oriented government affairs integrity behavior,and the male-oriented grassroots civil servants' work-oriented government affairs integrity behavior is significantly lower than that of women,and the rank of the officers is high.The higher the civil servant's massoriented government affairs integrity behavior is.Thirdly,when controlling demographic variables,the total score of policy executive ability and each dimension significantly positively affects the total score of government affairs integrity behavior and work-oriented government affairs integrity behavior.Policy understanding and policy implementation significantly positively affecting the behavior of the mass-oriented government affairs integrity behavior,the willpower of the policy has not significantly affected the behavior of the mass-oriented government affairs integrity behavior.
引文
[1]陈平泽,方宝璋,ChenPingze等.审计如何破解政策落实结构性困境——基于三个支农政策项目资金审计案例的分析[J].审计研究,2015,(02).
    [2]刘圣中,王晨.政策执行偏离的决策模式研究——以山西省X县农村低保制度的实践为例[J].长白学刊,2016,(05).
    [3]Yaghi A,Aljenaibi B.Happiness,Morality,Rationality,and Challenges in Implementing Smart Government Policy[J].Public Integrity,2017,(01).
    [4]曹永盛,朱娜娜.利益博弈视角下中央政策执行的科层制损耗[J].领导科学,2016,(11).
    [5]刘晓燕.政策执行困境:地方政府公务人员的双重选择[J].云南行政学院学报,2010,(06).
    [6]江凤娟.基层官员的政策目标再制定——以中小学布局调整政策为例[J].教育学术月刊,2012,(08).
    [7]吕耀怀,曹志.政府公信力的内在根基与外部制约[J].伦理学研究,2015,(05).
    [8]陈丽君,张存如.政府诚信:政府公信力的源泉和基础——西方政府诚信研究及其启示[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2008,(03).
    [9]丁煌,汪霞.地方政府政策执行力的动力机制及其模型构建——以协同学理论为视角[J].中国行政管理,2014,(03).
    [10]Mcginley K,Cubbage F W.Governmental regulation and nongovernmental certification of forests in the tropics:Policy,execution,uptake,and overlap in Costa Rica,Guatemala,and Nicaragua[J].Forest Policy&Economics,2011,13(3).
    [11]Ciobanu A, Androniceanu A.Civil Servants Motivation and Work Performance in Romanian Public Institutions[J].Procedia Economics&Finance,2015,30.
    [12]Zhe Z,Jiang W.The Executive Ability of the Grass Roots Civil Servants Based on the Correlation between Policy and Executive Ability[J].Canadian Social Science,2014,10(2).
    [13]Liu X,Fang H U.Analysis on the Ways to Improve Government Executive Ability[J].Canadian Social Science,2013,9(6).
    [14]袁新峰.关于政务诚信与社会信用体系建设关系的思考[J].征信,2013,(05).
    [15]李艳.政务诚信建设的本质、价值取向及其实现路径[J].求索,2014,(05).
    [16]陈洪连.政务诚信缺失问题及其矫治[J].中州学刊,2016,(02).
    [17]程倩.以政务诚信体系建设再生信任资源[J].中国行政管理,2016,(03).
    [18]赵曈,申旭光.我国公务员诚信行为动因研究[J].企业导报,2015,(12).
    [19]张萃萍.打造诚信政府的三个维度[J].求实,2007,(06).
    [20]李芬芬,陈建斌.政务诚信的四个来源[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(01).
    [21]王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系——对人格内涵及其中西方差异的理论与实证分析[J].心理学报,2006,(04).
    [22]李佳红.如何提升基层公务员执行力[J].合作经济与科技,2013,(12).
    [23]Bright L.Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees?[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,2007,27(4).
    [24]Gershtenson J,Ladewig J,Plane D L.Parties,Institutional Control,and Trust in Government[J].Social Science Quarterly,2006,87(4).
    [25]范柏乃,张鸣.地方政府信用影响因素及影响机理研究——基于116个县级行政区域的调查[J].公共管理学报,2012,(02).
    [26]张春燕.提高领导干部行政执行力问题研究——以吉林省为视角[J].行政与法,2010,(05).
    [27]余少祥.论公共利益的行政保护——法律原理与法律方法[J].环球法律评论,2008,(03).
    [28]张凤合.利益诉求视域中的公共政策价值取向[J].社会主义研究,2006,(01).
    [29]王艳.民意表达与公共参与:微博意见领袖研究[D].中国社会科学院研究生院硕士学位论文,2014.
    [30]王学杰.对政策执行力涵义的再思考[J].学习论坛,2010,(08).
    [31]朱然.执行主体的政策异化感构念维度研究[D].上海师范大学硕士学位论文,2015.
    [32]韩利红,王丛漫.关于加强基层公务员服务能力建设的思考[J].河北学刊,2014,(03).
    [33]李敏.德性、规范和修正:探析公共政策诚信问题的三个维度[J].行政论坛,2016,(01).
    [34]Mutula S,Wamukoya J M.Public sector information management in east and southern Africa:Implications for FOI,democracy and integrity in government[J].International Journal of Information Management,2009,(05).
    [35]姚克利.培植政府诚信提高政府公信力[J].决策咨询,2012,(03).
    [36][37]陈菊香.提升地方政府政策执行力的困境及其解蔽[J].理论导刊,2010,(08).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700