AHP法和灰色关联法在观赏辣椒果实外观品质评价中的应用
|
摘要
[目的]观赏辣椒果实外观品质综合分析具有一定实际应用价值。[方法]本论文以12份观赏辣椒果实为研究对象,运用层次分析和灰色关联相结合的方法构建涵盖3个层次(目标层、约束层和指标层)、13个指标(果形、果横径、果纵径、果形指数、果肩径、果实成熟期颜色、果实变色期颜色、单果重、果肉厚、心室数、果实着生方式、果表和果柄长)的观赏辣椒果实外观品质评价体系。[结果]试验结果表明:Q6、W1、Q1、Q4和W4五个材料果实外观品质较优;B3、Q5、S1和Q2四个材料果实外观品质良好;W6、B7和Q3三个材料果实外观品质较差。[结论]应用层次分析和灰色关联相结合的方法,可以方便、有效和快速的对观赏辣椒果实外观品质进行综合评价。
[Objective] The purpose of present study was to evaluate the combined technology of AHP and gray relation analysis in the appearance quality determination of ornamental pepper fruits. [Methods] Twelve different ornamental pepper fruits were selected as the research material. The appearance quality of the ornamental pepper fruit was synthetically analyzed by the method of analytic hierarchy process and gray relation analysis. The ornamental pepper fruit appearance quality evaluation system was built up, which included 3 levels(target layer, constraint layer, and index layer) and 13 indexes(fruit shape, fruit transverse diameter, fruit profile, fruit shape index, fruit shoulder diameter, fruit maturity color, fruit discoloration color, single fruit weight, flesh thick, number of ventricles, fruit birth mode, fruit table and length of fruit stalk). [Results] The results showed that five species, including Q6, W1, Q1, Q4 and W4 were superior in appearance quality, and the other four materials, including B3, Q5, S1 and Q2 were good in appearance quality, and the three materials, named W6, B7 and Q3, were poor in appearance quality. [Conclusion] The combination of analytic hierarchy process and gray relational analysis can be used to evaluate the appearance quality of ornamental pepper fruit conveniently, effectively and quickly.
[Objective] The purpose of present study was to evaluate the combined technology of AHP and gray relation analysis in the appearance quality determination of ornamental pepper fruits. [Methods] Twelve different ornamental pepper fruits were selected as the research material. The appearance quality of the ornamental pepper fruit was synthetically analyzed by the method of analytic hierarchy process and gray relation analysis. The ornamental pepper fruit appearance quality evaluation system was built up, which included 3 levels(target layer, constraint layer, and index layer) and 13 indexes(fruit shape, fruit transverse diameter, fruit profile, fruit shape index, fruit shoulder diameter, fruit maturity color, fruit discoloration color, single fruit weight, flesh thick, number of ventricles, fruit birth mode, fruit table and length of fruit stalk). [Results] The results showed that five species, including Q6, W1, Q1, Q4 and W4 were superior in appearance quality, and the other four materials, including B3, Q5, S1 and Q2 were good in appearance quality, and the three materials, named W6, B7 and Q3, were poor in appearance quality. [Conclusion] The combination of analytic hierarchy process and gray relational analysis can be used to evaluate the appearance quality of ornamental pepper fruit conveniently, effectively and quickly.
引文
[1]王佳敏,王军娥.观赏辣椒研究进展[J].北方园艺,2017(16):186-190.
[2]许红娟. 几种观赏辣椒耐荫性分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.
[3]杨莎,陈文超,张竹青,等.观赏盆栽辣椒品种及关键栽培技术[J].湖南农业科学,2015(5):93-95.
[4]叶霜,熊博,邱霞,等.果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(12):2038-2050.
[5]王轩,毕金峰,刘璇,等.不同产地红富士苹果品质的灰色关联度分析[J].食品科学,2013,34(23):88-91.
[6]刘遵春,包东娥,廖明安.层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),200634(8):125-128.
[7]孙利祥,黄惠芳.大棚辣椒品种比较及其果实品质的灰色关联分析[J].浙江农业学报,2005,17(6):368-371.
[8]陈贤,杨荣萍,杨德,等. AHP法和灰色关联法在小果型番茄果实商品性状评价上的应用[J].河南农业科学,2008,37(11):107-110.
[9]Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:McGraw Hill Inc,1980:50.
[10]弓成林,郭爱民,汪小伟,等.灰色关联度和层次分析法在葡萄品质评价上的应用[J].西南农业学报,2002,15(1):79-82.
[11]白世践,李超,户金鸽,等.层次-关联分析法在引种鲜食葡萄品质综合评价中的应用[J].北方园艺,2016(16):1-8.
[12]杨军,孙怡.中国樱桃品种经济性状的综合评判[J].生物数学学报,1998,13(3):334-337.
[13]刘志国.南疆砾质戈壁条件下枣种质资源的评价与筛选[D].保定:河北农业大学,2011.
[14]田浩,廖卫琴,周安韦,等.辣椒果实形态分类[J].农技服务,2014,31(7):62.
[15]Saaty T L. How to make a decision:the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9-26.
[16]邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1987:104-108.
[17]金翡翡.观赏茄果类蔬菜的评价与家庭园艺应用研究[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2011.
[18]范士杰.试用灰色关联度分析评价油菜区试品种[J].种子,1997(3):53-56.
[19]王东栋.切花须苞石竹杂种优势及主要观赏性状遗传效应分析[D].广州:华南农业大学,2016.
[2]许红娟. 几种观赏辣椒耐荫性分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.
[3]杨莎,陈文超,张竹青,等.观赏盆栽辣椒品种及关键栽培技术[J].湖南农业科学,2015(5):93-95.
[4]叶霜,熊博,邱霞,等.果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(12):2038-2050.
[5]王轩,毕金峰,刘璇,等.不同产地红富士苹果品质的灰色关联度分析[J].食品科学,2013,34(23):88-91.
[6]刘遵春,包东娥,廖明安.层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),200634(8):125-128.
[7]孙利祥,黄惠芳.大棚辣椒品种比较及其果实品质的灰色关联分析[J].浙江农业学报,2005,17(6):368-371.
[8]陈贤,杨荣萍,杨德,等. AHP法和灰色关联法在小果型番茄果实商品性状评价上的应用[J].河南农业科学,2008,37(11):107-110.
[9]Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:McGraw Hill Inc,1980:50.
[10]弓成林,郭爱民,汪小伟,等.灰色关联度和层次分析法在葡萄品质评价上的应用[J].西南农业学报,2002,15(1):79-82.
[11]白世践,李超,户金鸽,等.层次-关联分析法在引种鲜食葡萄品质综合评价中的应用[J].北方园艺,2016(16):1-8.
[12]杨军,孙怡.中国樱桃品种经济性状的综合评判[J].生物数学学报,1998,13(3):334-337.
[13]刘志国.南疆砾质戈壁条件下枣种质资源的评价与筛选[D].保定:河北农业大学,2011.
[14]田浩,廖卫琴,周安韦,等.辣椒果实形态分类[J].农技服务,2014,31(7):62.
[15]Saaty T L. How to make a decision:the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9-26.
[16]邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1987:104-108.
[17]金翡翡.观赏茄果类蔬菜的评价与家庭园艺应用研究[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2011.
[18]范士杰.试用灰色关联度分析评价油菜区试品种[J].种子,1997(3):53-56.
[19]王东栋.切花须苞石竹杂种优势及主要观赏性状遗传效应分析[D].广州:华南农业大学,2016.