提升新城区街道活力的空间营造策略——以南通万科翡翠公园为例
|
摘要
伴随着城市化的推进,越来越多的新城区开始涌现并取得了蓬勃发展。与此同时,由于缺少历史的沉淀,许多新城区并没有给居民带来归属感,尤其是那些如棋盘般阵列交错的城市街道,只发挥了解决城市交通的功能,而忽视了居民的情感体验。街道是居民感受城市魅力的主要场所,一旦居民失去了对街道的热情,那么新城区只能沦落为谋生之地而非安生之所。文章从场地亲和性、建筑包容性、装饰艺术性三方面,探索提升街道活力的空间营造策略,并以南通万科翡翠公园示范区为例,阐释了这三种策略的具体运用。
With the advancement of urbanization, more and more new urban areas have emerged and flourished. At the same time, due to the lack of historical precipitation, many new urban areas have not brought a sense of belonging to the residents, especially those urban streets that are interlaced like a checkerboard, which only play a role in providing urban traffic, while ignoring the emotional experience of residents. The street is the main place where residents feel the charm of the city. Once the residents lose their enthusiasm for street, the new urban areas can only be reduced to a place to earn a living instead of a place to live. From three aspects including site affinity, architectural inclusiveness and decorative art, the article explores the space development strategy for improving the vitality of street. Taking the Nantong Vanke Emerald Park Demonstration Zone as an example, this article illustrates the specific application of these three strategies.
With the advancement of urbanization, more and more new urban areas have emerged and flourished. At the same time, due to the lack of historical precipitation, many new urban areas have not brought a sense of belonging to the residents, especially those urban streets that are interlaced like a checkerboard, which only play a role in providing urban traffic, while ignoring the emotional experience of residents. The street is the main place where residents feel the charm of the city. Once the residents lose their enthusiasm for street, the new urban areas can only be reduced to a place to earn a living instead of a place to live. From three aspects including site affinity, architectural inclusiveness and decorative art, the article explores the space development strategy for improving the vitality of street. Taking the Nantong Vanke Emerald Park Demonstration Zone as an example, this article illustrates the specific application of these three strategies.
引文
[1]龙丁江,李雯,陈运山.国内外新城区建设中的社会空间分异研究综述[J].现代城市研究,2017(10):122-127.
[2][美]简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2010:30-37.
[3]鲁晓军,门坤玲,翁一峰.新城区建设的空间尺度问题与改进策略刍议[J].城市规划,2017,39(4):53-55.
[4]王劲柏,赵民.我国大规模新城区开发及其影响研究[J].城市规划学刊,2012(5):21-29.
[5]常青.存旧续新:以创意助推历史环境复兴:海口南洋风骑楼老街区整饬与再生设计思考[J].建筑遗产,2018(1):1-12.
[6][日]芦原义信.街道的美学(上)[M].尹培桐,译.南京:江苏凤凰文艺出版社,2017:114-115.
[2][美]简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2010:30-37.
[3]鲁晓军,门坤玲,翁一峰.新城区建设的空间尺度问题与改进策略刍议[J].城市规划,2017,39(4):53-55.
[4]王劲柏,赵民.我国大规模新城区开发及其影响研究[J].城市规划学刊,2012(5):21-29.
[5]常青.存旧续新:以创意助推历史环境复兴:海口南洋风骑楼老街区整饬与再生设计思考[J].建筑遗产,2018(1):1-12.
[6][日]芦原义信.街道的美学(上)[M].尹培桐,译.南京:江苏凤凰文艺出版社,2017:114-115.