Florida探针与普通牙周探针对慢性牙周炎基础治疗疗效的评价
|
摘要
目的评价牙周基础治疗对慢性牙周炎的疗效,评价Florida探针和普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的可重复性。方法对10例慢性牙周炎患者在牙周基础治疗前后,分别使用Florida探针和普通牙周探针重复测量牙周袋深度,记录探诊深度、出血指数和松动度,分别比较两种探针在治疗前和治疗后PD值的可重复性,并比较治疗前后患者PD、BI和MOB的变化。结果在牙周基础治疗前后,两种探针测量的PD值均具有较好的重复性(P>0.05),牙周基础治疗能够有效控制牙周炎症,明显降低患牙的PD、BI和MOB(P<0.05)。结论 Florida探针和普通牙周探针测量PD值均具有良好的可重复性,能够可靠的应用于牙周临床研究;牙周基础治疗能够有效控制牙周炎症,是治疗牙周炎的有效措施。
Objective To evaluate the curative effect of non-surgical treatment on chronic periodontitis and the reproducibility of the pocket depth measurement with Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe. Methods The pocket depths of 10 patient with chronic periodontitis were measured by Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe respectively before and after non-surgical treatment. The probing depth, the bleeding index, and the mobility were recorded. The PD measurement repeatability of two kinds of probes and the patients' PD, BI, and MOB before and after treatment were compared respectively. Results Before and after periodental non-surgical treatment, the PD measurement of two kinds of probes both had good repeatability(P > 0.05). The periodental nonsurgical treatment could effectively control the periodontal inflammation, and significantly reduced the PD, BI and MOB of patient's teeth(P < 0.05). Conclusion Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe both have good repeatability in the measurement of PD, and can be reliably applied to periodontal clinical research. Periodental nonsurgical treatment is a good therapy which can effectively control the periodontal inflammation.
Objective To evaluate the curative effect of non-surgical treatment on chronic periodontitis and the reproducibility of the pocket depth measurement with Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe. Methods The pocket depths of 10 patient with chronic periodontitis were measured by Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe respectively before and after non-surgical treatment. The probing depth, the bleeding index, and the mobility were recorded. The PD measurement repeatability of two kinds of probes and the patients' PD, BI, and MOB before and after treatment were compared respectively. Results Before and after periodental non-surgical treatment, the PD measurement of two kinds of probes both had good repeatability(P > 0.05). The periodental nonsurgical treatment could effectively control the periodontal inflammation, and significantly reduced the PD, BI and MOB of patient's teeth(P < 0.05). Conclusion Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe both have good repeatability in the measurement of PD, and can be reliably applied to periodontal clinical research. Periodental nonsurgical treatment is a good therapy which can effectively control the periodontal inflammation.
引文
[1]林崇韬.龈下刮治,根面平整术[J].中国实用口腔杂志科,2010(1):1-4.
[2]王姹,徐燕,李全利,等.米诺环素凝胶辅助治疗牙周炎的研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2012,47(1):63-66.
[3]Kawashima H,Sato S,Kishida M,et al.A comparision of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J].J Periodontal Res,2007,42(1):90-95.
[4]黄振,于晓潜,张立,等.新型龈下超声工作尖与手工器械龈下刮治效果比较的随机对照研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(9):513-517.
[5]冀章章,徐秀敏,章润贞,等.Er,Cr:YSGG激光治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效评价[J].安徽医科大学学报,2015,50(5):669-671.
[6]Sema SH,Petek Korkusuz,Gizem Berk,et al.Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and hand instrumentation on the attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts to periodontally diseased root surfaces:an in vitro study[J].Periodontol,2010,81(8):1216-1225.
[7]宋琛珉,黄邵玲,熊纪敏.对Florida探针临床应用的评价[J].首都医科大学学报,2013,34(3):454-457.
[8]康军,曹采方,沙月琴.Florida探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的比较[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):120-122.
[9]Ramachandra SS,Mehta DS,Sandesh N,et al.Periodontal probing systems:a review of available equipment[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent,2011,32(2):71-77.
[10]曹采方.牙周病学[M].第3版.北京:人们卫生出版社,2009:119-124.
[11]葛学军,罗晓晋,任秀云,等.Florida探针与普通牙周探针临床测量准确性的研究[J].中国药物与临床,2008,8(2):147-149.
[12]Preshaw DM,Kupp L,Helti AF,et al.Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-fore periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction[J].J Clin Periodontal,1999,26(7):434-440.
[13]周卉,唐志辉,曹采方.电子牙周探针在牙种植体周围组织探诊检查中的应用[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2010,24(2):93-95.
[14]Barendregt DS,Vander Velden U,Tinmerman MF,et al.Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients[J].J Clin Periodontal,2006,33(4):276-282.
[15]Clark WB,Yang MC,Magnusson I.Measuring clinical attachmeng:reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe[J].J Periodontol,1992,63(10):831-838.
[16]王迪,曾莉,王丽泉.牙周基础治疗在侵袭性牙周炎中的应用效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(1):23-25.
[2]王姹,徐燕,李全利,等.米诺环素凝胶辅助治疗牙周炎的研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2012,47(1):63-66.
[3]Kawashima H,Sato S,Kishida M,et al.A comparision of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo[J].J Periodontal Res,2007,42(1):90-95.
[4]黄振,于晓潜,张立,等.新型龈下超声工作尖与手工器械龈下刮治效果比较的随机对照研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(9):513-517.
[5]冀章章,徐秀敏,章润贞,等.Er,Cr:YSGG激光治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效评价[J].安徽医科大学学报,2015,50(5):669-671.
[6]Sema SH,Petek Korkusuz,Gizem Berk,et al.Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and hand instrumentation on the attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts to periodontally diseased root surfaces:an in vitro study[J].Periodontol,2010,81(8):1216-1225.
[7]宋琛珉,黄邵玲,熊纪敏.对Florida探针临床应用的评价[J].首都医科大学学报,2013,34(3):454-457.
[8]康军,曹采方,沙月琴.Florida探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的比较[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):120-122.
[9]Ramachandra SS,Mehta DS,Sandesh N,et al.Periodontal probing systems:a review of available equipment[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent,2011,32(2):71-77.
[10]曹采方.牙周病学[M].第3版.北京:人们卫生出版社,2009:119-124.
[11]葛学军,罗晓晋,任秀云,等.Florida探针与普通牙周探针临床测量准确性的研究[J].中国药物与临床,2008,8(2):147-149.
[12]Preshaw DM,Kupp L,Helti AF,et al.Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-fore periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction[J].J Clin Periodontal,1999,26(7):434-440.
[13]周卉,唐志辉,曹采方.电子牙周探针在牙种植体周围组织探诊检查中的应用[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2010,24(2):93-95.
[14]Barendregt DS,Vander Velden U,Tinmerman MF,et al.Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients[J].J Clin Periodontal,2006,33(4):276-282.
[15]Clark WB,Yang MC,Magnusson I.Measuring clinical attachmeng:reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe[J].J Periodontol,1992,63(10):831-838.
[16]王迪,曾莉,王丽泉.牙周基础治疗在侵袭性牙周炎中的应用效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(1):23-25.