腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的临床效果对比观察
|
摘要
目的分析比较腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的临床效果。方法选取粘连性肠梗阻患者56例,随机分为观察组与对照组各28例,观察组患者采用腹腔镜手术,对照组患者采用传统开腹手术。结果观察组患者的切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、肠蠕动恢复时间和住院时间等指标均优于对照组(P<0.05),观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻,创伤小,恢复快,并发症发生率低。
Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic and traditional open surgery in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods 56 patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction were chosen, were randomly divided into observation group and control group two groups of the 28 cases, observation group were treated by laparoscopic surgery, and the control group were treated by traditional open operation. Results The observation group of patients with incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, intestinal peristalsis recovery time and hospital stay and other indicators are better than that of control group(P<0.05), the complication rate of observation group of patients is lower than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction, small trauma, rapid recovery, low incidence of complications.
Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic and traditional open surgery in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods 56 patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction were chosen, were randomly divided into observation group and control group two groups of the 28 cases, observation group were treated by laparoscopic surgery, and the control group were treated by traditional open operation. Results The observation group of patients with incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, intestinal peristalsis recovery time and hospital stay and other indicators are better than that of control group(P<0.05), the complication rate of observation group of patients is lower than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction, small trauma, rapid recovery, low incidence of complications.
引文
[1]陈军杰,刘卫怀.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的对比研究[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(4):36-38,41.
[2]张智明,刘迁,刘峰,等.腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻临床观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(7):743-744.
[3]杨超,陈华,钟源波.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻68例临床效果对比研究[J].中国医药导刊,2014,16(5):806-807.
[4]夏德铭.腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻22例分析[J].检验医学与临床,2013,10(5):596-597.
[5]王德彪.腹腔镜下松懈与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻疗效比较[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2012,14(3):81-82.
[6]史宸硕.腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的疗效评价[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(6):43-44.
[7]孙江恒.开腹手术在粘连性肠梗阻治疗中的应用价值[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(2):17-18.
[2]张智明,刘迁,刘峰,等.腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻临床观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(7):743-744.
[3]杨超,陈华,钟源波.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻68例临床效果对比研究[J].中国医药导刊,2014,16(5):806-807.
[4]夏德铭.腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻22例分析[J].检验医学与临床,2013,10(5):596-597.
[5]王德彪.腹腔镜下松懈与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻疗效比较[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2012,14(3):81-82.
[6]史宸硕.腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的疗效评价[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(6):43-44.
[7]孙江恒.开腹手术在粘连性肠梗阻治疗中的应用价值[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,6(2):17-18.