昆明市社区居民身心健康现状调查
|
摘要
目的了解分析昆明市社区居民身心健康现状.方法采用生命质量8条简明量表(SF-8)中文版对昆明市城区社区居民身心健康进行评估.结果发放问卷1 000份,回收有效问卷996份,有效率99.6%.社区居民生理健康得分(52.38±5.79)分,心理健康得分(53.81±5.99)分,不同年龄段居民生理健康状况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),随着年龄的增加,社区居民的生理健康状况越差.不同疾病史、婚姻状况、饮食结构的居民生理健康状况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).重体力活情况不同的居民生理健康状况和心理健康状况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论社区居民身心健康状况不容乐观,不同年龄段、婚姻状况、饮食结构等的社区居民身心健康状况不同,其中老年人身心健康状况表现较差.
Objective To investigate and analyze the physical and mental health status of community residents in Kunming.Me thods Quality of life questionnaire(SF-8 health survey,Chinese version) was used to assess the physical and mental health status of community residents in Kunming.Re s ults Totally 1000 copies of the questionnaire were distributed and 996 copies of valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective rate of99.6%.Community health score was(53.28±5.79) points and mental health score was(53.81±5.99) points.The physiological health status of residents in different age groups was significantly different(P <0.05), the physiological status of community residents becoming worse with the age.There were significant differences in physiological status of residents with different medical history, marital status and dietary structure(P <0.05).The differences of physical and mental health status among residents with different physical activities were statistically significant( P <0.05).Conclus ion The community residents' physical and mental health status is not optimistic.The community residents with different age,marital status and diet structure have different physical and mental health status.Among them,the physical and mental health status of the elderly is poor.
Objective To investigate and analyze the physical and mental health status of community residents in Kunming.Me thods Quality of life questionnaire(SF-8 health survey,Chinese version) was used to assess the physical and mental health status of community residents in Kunming.Re s ults Totally 1000 copies of the questionnaire were distributed and 996 copies of valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective rate of99.6%.Community health score was(53.28±5.79) points and mental health score was(53.81±5.99) points.The physiological health status of residents in different age groups was significantly different(P <0.05), the physiological status of community residents becoming worse with the age.There were significant differences in physiological status of residents with different medical history, marital status and dietary structure(P <0.05).The differences of physical and mental health status among residents with different physical activities were statistically significant( P <0.05).Conclus ion The community residents' physical and mental health status is not optimistic.The community residents with different age,marital status and diet structure have different physical and mental health status.Among them,the physical and mental health status of the elderly is poor.
引文
[1]潘孝富,朱新田.城市社区居民心理健康服务需求状况分析[J].湘南学院学报,2012,33(4):28-31.
[2]张臻平,李清萍,洪文治.鲤城区2013年社区居民健康行为调查分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2015,21(1):107-109.
[3]施云涛,任伟明.宁夏永宁县社区居民健康认知与健康行为现状及其影响因素分析[J].中国卫生统计,2014,31(5):860-862.
[4]李静,王慧奇,苑记清.2型糖尿病患者焦虑抑郁与生活质量的相关性研究[J].天津护理,2017,25(4):290-292.
[5]文小玲,罗家洪,李欣,等.不同性别农村佤族老年人生命质量分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2017,38(6):25-27.
[6]JR L E,XU J,LIN S F,et al.A comparison of SF-36 and SF-12 composite scores and subsequent hospitalization and mortality risks in long-term dialysis patients.[J].Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Cjasn,2010,5(2):252-260.
[7]JR L J,HARMON G N,ASHBY K M,et al.Use of the SF-8to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill,low-income population participating in the Central Louisiana Medication Access Program(CMAP)[J].Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment Care&Rehabilitation,2005,14(3):665-673.
[8]赵永,宗琳芳,吴林雄,等.某铁路局火车司机身心健康的影响因素分析[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(7):625-629.
[9]王文娟,刘露,江启成.EQ-5D与SF-12量表在安徽省农村糖尿病患者生命质量评估中的应用[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2013,17(4):287-290.
[10]丁桂兰.加强大学生心理健康教育的对策思考[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.
[11]杨铮,万崇华,许传志,等.云南壮族居民生命质量的影响因素分析[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(13):967-968.
[12]陈娜,李宁秀,高博,等.成都市社区老年人口生命质量及其影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(15):3904-3907.
[13]孙艳梅,杨学传.社区老年人生命质量及影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(17):3144-3146.
[14]殷俊益,于玥,宋湘勤.大学生生活方式与心理健康的相关研究[J].中国体育科技,2010,46(3):128-133.
[15]LIN T F.MODIFIABLE health risk factors and medical expenditures-the case of Taiwan[J].Soc Sci Med,2008,67(11):1727-1736.
[16]胡利人,孔丹莉,陈观进.某医学院学生危害健康行为描述性研究[J].中国学校卫生,2002,23(1):20-21.
[17]保文莉,毛健宇,王丽,等.云南省医务人员身心健康状况的调查与分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2017,38(9):44-48.
[2]张臻平,李清萍,洪文治.鲤城区2013年社区居民健康行为调查分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2015,21(1):107-109.
[3]施云涛,任伟明.宁夏永宁县社区居民健康认知与健康行为现状及其影响因素分析[J].中国卫生统计,2014,31(5):860-862.
[4]李静,王慧奇,苑记清.2型糖尿病患者焦虑抑郁与生活质量的相关性研究[J].天津护理,2017,25(4):290-292.
[5]文小玲,罗家洪,李欣,等.不同性别农村佤族老年人生命质量分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2017,38(6):25-27.
[6]JR L E,XU J,LIN S F,et al.A comparison of SF-36 and SF-12 composite scores and subsequent hospitalization and mortality risks in long-term dialysis patients.[J].Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Cjasn,2010,5(2):252-260.
[7]JR L J,HARMON G N,ASHBY K M,et al.Use of the SF-8to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill,low-income population participating in the Central Louisiana Medication Access Program(CMAP)[J].Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment Care&Rehabilitation,2005,14(3):665-673.
[8]赵永,宗琳芳,吴林雄,等.某铁路局火车司机身心健康的影响因素分析[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(7):625-629.
[9]王文娟,刘露,江启成.EQ-5D与SF-12量表在安徽省农村糖尿病患者生命质量评估中的应用[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2013,17(4):287-290.
[10]丁桂兰.加强大学生心理健康教育的对策思考[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.
[11]杨铮,万崇华,许传志,等.云南壮族居民生命质量的影响因素分析[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(13):967-968.
[12]陈娜,李宁秀,高博,等.成都市社区老年人口生命质量及其影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(15):3904-3907.
[13]孙艳梅,杨学传.社区老年人生命质量及影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(17):3144-3146.
[14]殷俊益,于玥,宋湘勤.大学生生活方式与心理健康的相关研究[J].中国体育科技,2010,46(3):128-133.
[15]LIN T F.MODIFIABLE health risk factors and medical expenditures-the case of Taiwan[J].Soc Sci Med,2008,67(11):1727-1736.
[16]胡利人,孔丹莉,陈观进.某医学院学生危害健康行为描述性研究[J].中国学校卫生,2002,23(1):20-21.
[17]保文莉,毛健宇,王丽,等.云南省医务人员身心健康状况的调查与分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2017,38(9):44-48.