基于二元语义组合赋权的制造企业绿色创新能力评价模型及实证研究
|
摘要
随着可持续发展战略成为21世纪全球人类面临的共同选择,绿色创新也逐渐成为企业发展的新趋势和学者关注的新领域。从绿色创新投入能力、绿色创新产出能力及绿色创新支撑能力3个方面构建了制造企业绿色创新能力评价指标体系,运用二元语义AHM法、二元语义离差最大法及二元语义熵值法确定指标权重,然后基于最小距离-最大熵原理集成赋权结果得到组合权重,由此构建出制造企业绿色创新能力评价模型。最后以黑龙江省两家装备制造企业为例进行实证分析,结果表明:两企业在绿色创新方面取得较好的效果,且整体评价值对关键指标变动不敏感。此外,提出进一步提高可持续发展能力的具体决策指导,为我国制造企业绿色创新能力评价和未来决策提供理论参考。
As the strategy of sustainable development has been a common choice that mankind is facing worldwide in the 21 st century,environmental innovation is transforming into a new trend in the development of enterprises and a new field of academic concerns. In this paper,an environmental innovation indicator system of manufacturing enterprises is built based on three aspects,which were the environmental innovation investment capability,the environmental innovation output capability and the environmental innovation supporting capability. In determining the indicator weights,the two-tuple linguistic AHM method,the two-tuple linguistic maximum deviation method and the two-tuple linguistic entropy evaluation method are taken to get the indicator weights of each layer,and then the combination weight of the above three methods is determined based on the Minimum Distance-Maximum Entropy principle. Furthermore,an empirical evaluation of the two equipment manufacturing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province are taken as the example to illustrate the feasibility of this method,and a comparative analysis of the environmental innovative capability of the enterprises was also carried on. The results shows that the two enterprises both achieve good results in the overall environmental innovative capability and the key indicators' changes to the overall evaluation value are not sensitive.
As the strategy of sustainable development has been a common choice that mankind is facing worldwide in the 21 st century,environmental innovation is transforming into a new trend in the development of enterprises and a new field of academic concerns. In this paper,an environmental innovation indicator system of manufacturing enterprises is built based on three aspects,which were the environmental innovation investment capability,the environmental innovation output capability and the environmental innovation supporting capability. In determining the indicator weights,the two-tuple linguistic AHM method,the two-tuple linguistic maximum deviation method and the two-tuple linguistic entropy evaluation method are taken to get the indicator weights of each layer,and then the combination weight of the above three methods is determined based on the Minimum Distance-Maximum Entropy principle. Furthermore,an empirical evaluation of the two equipment manufacturing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province are taken as the example to illustrate the feasibility of this method,and a comparative analysis of the environmental innovative capability of the enterprises was also carried on. The results shows that the two enterprises both achieve good results in the overall environmental innovative capability and the key indicators' changes to the overall evaluation value are not sensitive.
引文
[1]Herrera F,Herrera Viedma E,Verdegay J L.A linguistic decision process in group decision process in group decision making[J].Group Decision Negotiation,1996,(5):165-176.
[2]Herrera F,Herrera Viedma E,Verdegay J L.A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessment[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,88:31-49.
[3]Wan S P.2-tuple linguistic hybrid arithmetic aggregation operators and application to multi-attribute group decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,45(3):31-40.
[4]Wan S P.Some hybrid geometric aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making[J].International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2013,6(4):750-763.
[5]Jin H P,Park J M,Kwun Y C.2-tuple linguistic harmonic operators and their applications in group decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,44(1):10-19.
[6]Tang F,Meng J.Extended 2-tuple linguistic hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making[J].International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2014,7(4):771-784.
[7]王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5.
[8]丁勇,梁昌勇,朱俊红,等.群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(5):165-170.
[9]刘德海,于倩,马晓南,等.基于最小偏差组合权重的突发事件应急能力评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):79-86.
[10]曹庆奎,任向阳,刘琛,等.基于粗集——未确知测度模型的企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(4):67-72.
[11]张晓明.基于粗糙集-AHM的装备制造业企业创新能力评价指标权重计算研究[J].中国软科学,2014,(6):151-158.
[12]武春友,陈兴红,匡海波.基于AHP-标准离差的企业绿色度可拓学评价模型及实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(11):109-117.
[13]姜昱汐,吴雷,葛继平.最小差距最大化组合赋权的软件服务外包产业核心竞争力评价模型及实证[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(4):158-166.
[14]迟国泰,李刚,程砚秋.基于AHP-标准离差的人的全面发展评价模型及其实证研究管理学报[J].管理学报,2010,7(2):301-310.
[15]张国权,李文立,王明征.基于离差函数和联合熵的组合赋权方法团管理学报[J].管理学报,2008,5(3):376-380.
[16]李刚,王斌,周立斌,等.基于标准差修正G1组合赋权的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2473-2485.
[17]Herrera F,Nartinez L.A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2001,8(6):746-752.
[18]于鹏飞,王丽娜.财务预警中样本数据无量纲化方法的选择[J].会计之友,2005,(12):43-44.
[19]迟国泰,齐菲,张楠.基于最优组合赋权的城市生态评价模型及应用[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(2):183-191.
[2]Herrera F,Herrera Viedma E,Verdegay J L.A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessment[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,88:31-49.
[3]Wan S P.2-tuple linguistic hybrid arithmetic aggregation operators and application to multi-attribute group decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,45(3):31-40.
[4]Wan S P.Some hybrid geometric aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making[J].International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2013,6(4):750-763.
[5]Jin H P,Park J M,Kwun Y C.2-tuple linguistic harmonic operators and their applications in group decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,44(1):10-19.
[6]Tang F,Meng J.Extended 2-tuple linguistic hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making[J].International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2014,7(4):771-784.
[7]王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5.
[8]丁勇,梁昌勇,朱俊红,等.群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(5):165-170.
[9]刘德海,于倩,马晓南,等.基于最小偏差组合权重的突发事件应急能力评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):79-86.
[10]曹庆奎,任向阳,刘琛,等.基于粗集——未确知测度模型的企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(4):67-72.
[11]张晓明.基于粗糙集-AHM的装备制造业企业创新能力评价指标权重计算研究[J].中国软科学,2014,(6):151-158.
[12]武春友,陈兴红,匡海波.基于AHP-标准离差的企业绿色度可拓学评价模型及实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(11):109-117.
[13]姜昱汐,吴雷,葛继平.最小差距最大化组合赋权的软件服务外包产业核心竞争力评价模型及实证[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(4):158-166.
[14]迟国泰,李刚,程砚秋.基于AHP-标准离差的人的全面发展评价模型及其实证研究管理学报[J].管理学报,2010,7(2):301-310.
[15]张国权,李文立,王明征.基于离差函数和联合熵的组合赋权方法团管理学报[J].管理学报,2008,5(3):376-380.
[16]李刚,王斌,周立斌,等.基于标准差修正G1组合赋权的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2473-2485.
[17]Herrera F,Nartinez L.A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2001,8(6):746-752.
[18]于鹏飞,王丽娜.财务预警中样本数据无量纲化方法的选择[J].会计之友,2005,(12):43-44.
[19]迟国泰,齐菲,张楠.基于最优组合赋权的城市生态评价模型及应用[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(2):183-191.