农民工市民化与城镇化进程的共生与错位
|
摘要
农民工市民化与城镇化进程有着必然的共生关联,但是在实践中,农民工市民化的实践事实与迅猛的城镇化进程相分离。在城镇化进程中,城镇化的经济驱动型特征与农民工市民化的经济给付型需要错位,国家推进人口城镇化的强意志与地方政府的弱反应形成反差,城市发展不平衡的现实与农民工的市民化意愿存在矛盾。在城镇化发展中,要以"共享"为理念,重构农民工的城市权利;以"主体性"为依归,尊重农民工的市民化选择;以"均衡发展"为目标,拓宽农民工的发展路径。
There is an inevitable symbiotic relation in migrant workers' citizenization process and the urbanization process.However,in reality,migrant workers' citizenization is separated from the rapid urbanization process.In the process of urbanization,there is a misalignment between the economy-driving characteristics of urbanization and economic benefit needs of transforming migrant workers into citizens;there is a contrast between the state government's strong will in promoting the urbanization of population and the local government's weak response;as well as an inconsistency between the reality of unbalanced urban development and the willingness of the migrant workers turning into citizens.In the development of urbanization,we need to reconstruct the urban rights of migrant workers taking"sharing"as the concept,to respect migrant workers' choices based on their "subjectivity",and to broaden migrant workers' development paths with the goal of "balanced development".
There is an inevitable symbiotic relation in migrant workers' citizenization process and the urbanization process.However,in reality,migrant workers' citizenization is separated from the rapid urbanization process.In the process of urbanization,there is a misalignment between the economy-driving characteristics of urbanization and economic benefit needs of transforming migrant workers into citizens;there is a contrast between the state government's strong will in promoting the urbanization of population and the local government's weak response;as well as an inconsistency between the reality of unbalanced urban development and the willingness of the migrant workers turning into citizens.In the development of urbanization,we need to reconstruct the urban rights of migrant workers taking"sharing"as the concept,to respect migrant workers' choices based on their "subjectivity",and to broaden migrant workers' development paths with the goal of "balanced development".
引文
[1]殷江滨,李郇.中国人口流动与城镇化进程的回顾与展望[J].城市问题,2012(12):23-29.
[2]李爱民.中国半城镇化研究[J].人口研究,2013(4):80-90.
[3]《中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报》[EB/OL].(2018-02-28)[2018-09-28]. www.tjcn. org/tjgb/00zg/35328. html.
[4]王树春,王俊.论新常态下提高城镇化质量的动力机制[J].贵州社会科学,2016(1):117-121.
[5]范进,赵定涛.土地城镇化与人口城镇化协调性测定及其影响因素[J].经济学家,2012(5):61-67.
[6]车海刚,张菀航.以人为核心的城镇化应坚持二维改革路径——辜胜阻谈新型城镇化[J].中国发展观察,2014(11):25-28.
[7]李强,陈宇琳,刘精明.中国城镇化推进模式研究[J].中国社会科学,2012(7):82-100.
[8]刘华军,张权,杨骞.城镇化、空间溢出与区域经济增长[J].农业技术经济,2014(10):95-105.
[9]单菁菁.农民工市民化的成本及其分担机制研究[J].学海,2015(1):177-184.
[10]李一花,高焕洪,乔敏.农业转移人口市民化成本测算与分担研究[J].公共财政研究,2015(3):18-31.
[11]魏后凯.中国城镇化进程中两极化倾向与规模格局重构[J].中国工业经济,2014(3):18-30.
[12]刘妮娜,刘诚.合理、有序推进中国人口城镇化的路径分析[J].经济学家,2014(2):21-27.
[13]陈培阳,朱喜钢.基于不同尺度的中国区域经济差异[J].地理学报,2012(8):1085-1097.
[14]任远.城镇化的升级和新型城镇化[J].城市规划学刊,2016(2):66-71.
[15]胡小武.广义城市福利的内涵与指标体系研究[J].东岳论丛,2011(6):47-51.
[16]吴越菲.农业转移人口的“选择性市民化”:一项类型学考察[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(2):32-40.
[17]江立华.农民工的转型与政府的政策选择[M].中国社会科学出版社,2014:33.
(1)数据来源:统计局官方网站
[2]李爱民.中国半城镇化研究[J].人口研究,2013(4):80-90.
[3]《中华人民共和国2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报》[EB/OL].(2018-02-28)[2018-09-28]. www.tjcn. org/tjgb/00zg/35328. html.
[4]王树春,王俊.论新常态下提高城镇化质量的动力机制[J].贵州社会科学,2016(1):117-121.
[5]范进,赵定涛.土地城镇化与人口城镇化协调性测定及其影响因素[J].经济学家,2012(5):61-67.
[6]车海刚,张菀航.以人为核心的城镇化应坚持二维改革路径——辜胜阻谈新型城镇化[J].中国发展观察,2014(11):25-28.
[7]李强,陈宇琳,刘精明.中国城镇化推进模式研究[J].中国社会科学,2012(7):82-100.
[8]刘华军,张权,杨骞.城镇化、空间溢出与区域经济增长[J].农业技术经济,2014(10):95-105.
[9]单菁菁.农民工市民化的成本及其分担机制研究[J].学海,2015(1):177-184.
[10]李一花,高焕洪,乔敏.农业转移人口市民化成本测算与分担研究[J].公共财政研究,2015(3):18-31.
[11]魏后凯.中国城镇化进程中两极化倾向与规模格局重构[J].中国工业经济,2014(3):18-30.
[12]刘妮娜,刘诚.合理、有序推进中国人口城镇化的路径分析[J].经济学家,2014(2):21-27.
[13]陈培阳,朱喜钢.基于不同尺度的中国区域经济差异[J].地理学报,2012(8):1085-1097.
[14]任远.城镇化的升级和新型城镇化[J].城市规划学刊,2016(2):66-71.
[15]胡小武.广义城市福利的内涵与指标体系研究[J].东岳论丛,2011(6):47-51.
[16]吴越菲.农业转移人口的“选择性市民化”:一项类型学考察[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(2):32-40.
[17]江立华.农民工的转型与政府的政策选择[M].中国社会科学出版社,2014:33.
(1)数据来源:统计局官方网站