军事概念模型分层次验证方法研究
|
摘要
概念模型验证是建模与仿真校核、验证与确认中的重点和难点。军事概念模型的内涵丰富、层次多、种类多,因而难以在一个层次上验证其全部内容。鉴于此,提出了军事概念模型分层次验证方法,将其划分为系统层、模型层、设计层3个层次,然后分析了各个层次的验证内容、验证指标、验证过程和验证方法。该方法的优点是明确了概念建模各个阶段的验证内容和验证方法,分解了验证工作的复杂性,增强了验证工作的阶段性、层次性、针对性和可操作性。
The validation of conceptual models are still important and difficult in the verification,validation and accreditation of modeling and simulation.It is hard to validate conceptual models in single level because of their abundant,various and multi-level contents.A layered validation method of military conceptual models was advanced.The validation of military conceptual models is divided into three layers:system layer,model layer and design layer.The validation contents,the validation index,the validation process and the validation methods of each level of the conceptual models validation were analyzed.Advantages of the advanced method are to clear validation content and validation methods of each stage of conceptual modeling,decompound complexity of validation work and enhance the stage,hierarchy,pertinence and maneuverability of the validation work.
The validation of conceptual models are still important and difficult in the verification,validation and accreditation of modeling and simulation.It is hard to validate conceptual models in single level because of their abundant,various and multi-level contents.A layered validation method of military conceptual models was advanced.The validation of military conceptual models is divided into three layers:system layer,model layer and design layer.The validation contents,the validation index,the validation process and the validation methods of each level of the conceptual models validation were analyzed.Advantages of the advanced method are to clear validation content and validation methods of each stage of conceptual modeling,decompound complexity of validation work and enhance the stage,hierarchy,pertinence and maneuverability of the validation work.
引文
[1]唐见兵.作战仿真系统可信性研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2009
[2]王勇.复杂仿真系统概念模型建立与评估方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009
[3]王杏林.概念建模[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007:125-131
[4]Pace D K.Ideas About Simulation Conceptual Model Development[J].Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest,2000,21(3):327-336
[5]Johnson,Thomas H.Mission Space Model Development,Reuse and the Conceptual Models of the Mission Space Toolset[C]∥Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop Papers.2003:893-900
[6]吴永波,何晓晔,谭东风.军事建模仿真中概念模型定义比较[J].火力与指挥控制,2007,32(11):49-53
[7]刘彬.仿真系统概念模型验证方法的分析与选择[J].计算机仿真,2012,29(5):111-115
[8]樊浩,黄树彩.基于Petri网的概念模型验证方法研究[J].计算机应用研究,2010,27(3):999-1002
[9]张琦,王达,黄柯棣.概念模型的描述方法和验证过程[J].计算机仿真,2004,21(12):70-72
[10]黄力.基于Statechart图的C4ISR系统体系结构验证方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2004
[11]付广胜.基于xUML可执行模型的C4ISR系统需求开发与验证方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2007
[12]陈健.基于本体的仿真想定校验方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2009
[13]杨惠珍,李家宽,康凤举.联邦概念模型及其VV&A研究[J].计算机仿真,2009,26(7):109-112
[14]胡鹏,邵晨曦.一种军事仿真概念模型的完整性评估方法[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(16):4207-4210
[2]王勇.复杂仿真系统概念模型建立与评估方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009
[3]王杏林.概念建模[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007:125-131
[4]Pace D K.Ideas About Simulation Conceptual Model Development[J].Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest,2000,21(3):327-336
[5]Johnson,Thomas H.Mission Space Model Development,Reuse and the Conceptual Models of the Mission Space Toolset[C]∥Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop Papers.2003:893-900
[6]吴永波,何晓晔,谭东风.军事建模仿真中概念模型定义比较[J].火力与指挥控制,2007,32(11):49-53
[7]刘彬.仿真系统概念模型验证方法的分析与选择[J].计算机仿真,2012,29(5):111-115
[8]樊浩,黄树彩.基于Petri网的概念模型验证方法研究[J].计算机应用研究,2010,27(3):999-1002
[9]张琦,王达,黄柯棣.概念模型的描述方法和验证过程[J].计算机仿真,2004,21(12):70-72
[10]黄力.基于Statechart图的C4ISR系统体系结构验证方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2004
[11]付广胜.基于xUML可执行模型的C4ISR系统需求开发与验证方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2007
[12]陈健.基于本体的仿真想定校验方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2009
[13]杨惠珍,李家宽,康凤举.联邦概念模型及其VV&A研究[J].计算机仿真,2009,26(7):109-112
[14]胡鹏,邵晨曦.一种军事仿真概念模型的完整性评估方法[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(16):4207-4210