国外碳市场研究进展的知识图谱分析
|
摘要
以Web of Science(WOS)核心合集及SSCI数据库中收录的主题为碳市场的英文文献作为研究对象,运用CiteSpaceV可视化工具,对1998-2017年3 241篇相关文献进行分析,得出以下结论:以碳市场为主题的相关论文发表量自2008年出现骤增;《Energy Policy》和《Energy Economics》是该领域被引率最高的两大期刊;中国在该领域的科研发展势头较强劲,代表学者有WEI Yi-ming(魏一鸣),ZHU Lei(朱磊),FAN Ying(范英),LIN Bo-qiang(林伯强)等。通过分析碳市场领域关键词词频与聚类知识图谱可知,气候变化、碳市场交易机制、碳市场政策保障措施和碳税征收方案等是主流研究领域,削减温室气体排放、缓解气候变暖等为研究热点,建立碳市场是主要应对方案。目前,为发展完善碳市场,各国政府相继出台有关法律政策,强化控排减排目标,极力追求整个社会的可持续发展,为碳市场的健康发展已经创造了有利的环境。
This paper takes the English collection of the core of Web of Science(WOS)and the SSCI database as the research object,and uses CiteSpaceV visual literature analysis tool to analyze 3,241 related documents from 1998 to 2017.The results of the study show that the number of related papers published on the carbon market has increased sharply since 2008;Energy Policy and Energy Economics are the two most cited journals in the field;China's scientific research in this field is developing at a relatively high speed.Representative scholars include Wei Yi-ming,Zhu Lei,Fan Ying and Lin Bo-qiang.In addition,by analyzing the keyword frequency and clustering knowledge maps in the carbon market,it is known that climate change issues,carbon market trading mechanisms,carbon market policy safeguards and carbon tax collection schemes are mainstream research areas.The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the alleviation of climate warming are research hotspots,and the establishment of a carbon market is the main response.In order to develop and improve the carbon market,governments of various countries have successively issued relevant laws and policies,strengthened the targets for emission reduction and emission reduction,and vigorously pursued the sustainable development of the entire society.
This paper takes the English collection of the core of Web of Science(WOS)and the SSCI database as the research object,and uses CiteSpaceV visual literature analysis tool to analyze 3,241 related documents from 1998 to 2017.The results of the study show that the number of related papers published on the carbon market has increased sharply since 2008;Energy Policy and Energy Economics are the two most cited journals in the field;China's scientific research in this field is developing at a relatively high speed.Representative scholars include Wei Yi-ming,Zhu Lei,Fan Ying and Lin Bo-qiang.In addition,by analyzing the keyword frequency and clustering knowledge maps in the carbon market,it is known that climate change issues,carbon market trading mechanisms,carbon market policy safeguards and carbon tax collection schemes are mainstream research areas.The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the alleviation of climate warming are research hotspots,and the establishment of a carbon market is the main response.In order to develop and improve the carbon market,governments of various countries have successively issued relevant laws and policies,strengthened the targets for emission reduction and emission reduction,and vigorously pursued the sustainable development of the entire society.
引文
[1]章升东,宋维明,李怒云.国际碳市场现状与趋势[J].世界林业研究,2005(05):11-15.
[2]雷立钧,荆哲峰.国际碳交易市场发展对中国的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011(04):30-36.
[3]陈伟,宋维明.国际主要碳交易市场价格形成机制及其借鉴[J].价格理论与实践,2014(01):115-117.
[4]陈婉.《2018年度全球碳市场进展报告》发布全球碳市场呈现新格局[J].环境经济,2018(05):44-47.
[5]易兰,杨历,李朝鹏,等.欧盟碳价影响因素研究及其对中国的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(06):42-48.
[6]陈悦,刘则渊.科学知识图谱的发展历程[J].科学学研究,2008(03):449-460.
[7]李金兵,唐方方.低碳城市研究关键词共词网络的可视化分析[J].科技管理研究,2012(08):40-44.
[8]孙新,冯瑶.基于教育政策的教育机会均等知识图谱研究---1992年-2016年CNKI期刊的可视化分析[J].宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版),2017(03):103-108.
[9]魏一鸣,袁潇晨,吴刚,等.气候变化风险评估研究现状与热点:基于Web of Science的文献计量分析[J].中国科学基金,2014(05):347-356.
[10]罗福周,陆邦柱.知识图谱视角下中国循环经济研究动态分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2017(03):109-113.
[11]余菜花,廉同辉,刘军.中国低碳研究的知识图谱分析[J].资源科学,2012(10):1959-1964.
[12]王成城,蒋海萍,吴婷,等.中国低碳研究领域知识图谱:基于共词网络的计量研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013(09):19-27.
[13]任晓松,孙天美,赵国浩.中国碳排放研究热点演化知识图谱分析[J].科技管理研究,2018(10):235-243.
[14]KOCH N,FUSS S,GROSJEAN G,et al.Causes of the EU ETS price drop:Recession,CDM,renewable policies or a bit of everything?-New evidence[J].Energy Policy,2014,73:676-685.
[15]KRIEGLER E,RIAHI K,BAUER N,et al.Making or breaking climate targets:The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy[J].Technological Forecasting&Social Change,2015,90:24-44.
[16]KALKUHL M,EDENHOFER O,LESSMANNK.Learning or lock-in:Optimal technology policies to support mitigation[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2011(01):01-23.
[17]SIEGMEIER J,MATTAUCH L,FRANKS M,et al.The fiscal benefits of stringent climate change mitigation:an overview[J].Climate Policy,2017(04):352-367.
[18]CUI L B,FAN Y,ZHU L,et al.How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020carbon intensity reduction target?[J].Applied Energy,2014,136:1043-1052.
[19]MO J L,AGNOLUCCI P,JIANG M R,et al.The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme(ETS)on low carbon energy(LCE)investment[J].Energy Policy,2016,89:271-283.
[20]ALBEROLA E,CHEVALLIER J,CHEZE B.Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007[J].Energy Policy,2007(02):787-797.
[21]CHEVALLIER J.Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors:A view from the EU ETS[J].Energy Economics,2009(04):614-625.
[22]KOSO N,CORBERA E.Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism[J].Ecological E-conomics,2009(06):1228-1236.
[23]THOMAS S,DARGUSCH P,STEVE S,et al.Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects?[J].Land Use Policy,2010(03):880-887.
[24]DUAN H B,ZHU L,FAN Y.Optimal carbon taxes in carbon-constrained China:A logistic-induced energy economic hybrid model[J].Energy,2014,69:345-356.
(1)《京都议定书》,https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1998/09/19980921%2004-41%20PM/Ch_XXVII_07_ap.pdf.
(2)附件一国家(1998年修订)是指签署《京都议定书》的所有国家与集团:澳大利亚、奥地利、白俄罗斯、比利时、保加利亚、加拿大、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、丹麦、爱沙尼亚、欧洲经济共同体、芬兰、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、冰岛、爱尔兰、意大利、日本、拉脱维亚、列支敦士登、立陶宛、卢森堡、摩纳哥、荷兰、新西兰、挪威、波兰、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、俄罗斯联邦、斯洛伐克、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士、乌克兰、英国、美国。
(3)ICAP《2018年度全球碳市场进展报告》,http://www.huanjing100.com/p-3977.html.
(4)IPCC第四次评估报告,http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf.
(5)《国务院关于加快培育和发展战略性新兴产业的决定》,http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-10/18/content_1724848.htm.
(6)《关于开展碳排放权交易试点工作的通知》,http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201201/t20120113_456506.html.
[2]雷立钧,荆哲峰.国际碳交易市场发展对中国的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011(04):30-36.
[3]陈伟,宋维明.国际主要碳交易市场价格形成机制及其借鉴[J].价格理论与实践,2014(01):115-117.
[4]陈婉.《2018年度全球碳市场进展报告》发布全球碳市场呈现新格局[J].环境经济,2018(05):44-47.
[5]易兰,杨历,李朝鹏,等.欧盟碳价影响因素研究及其对中国的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(06):42-48.
[6]陈悦,刘则渊.科学知识图谱的发展历程[J].科学学研究,2008(03):449-460.
[7]李金兵,唐方方.低碳城市研究关键词共词网络的可视化分析[J].科技管理研究,2012(08):40-44.
[8]孙新,冯瑶.基于教育政策的教育机会均等知识图谱研究---1992年-2016年CNKI期刊的可视化分析[J].宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版),2017(03):103-108.
[9]魏一鸣,袁潇晨,吴刚,等.气候变化风险评估研究现状与热点:基于Web of Science的文献计量分析[J].中国科学基金,2014(05):347-356.
[10]罗福周,陆邦柱.知识图谱视角下中国循环经济研究动态分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2017(03):109-113.
[11]余菜花,廉同辉,刘军.中国低碳研究的知识图谱分析[J].资源科学,2012(10):1959-1964.
[12]王成城,蒋海萍,吴婷,等.中国低碳研究领域知识图谱:基于共词网络的计量研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013(09):19-27.
[13]任晓松,孙天美,赵国浩.中国碳排放研究热点演化知识图谱分析[J].科技管理研究,2018(10):235-243.
[14]KOCH N,FUSS S,GROSJEAN G,et al.Causes of the EU ETS price drop:Recession,CDM,renewable policies or a bit of everything?-New evidence[J].Energy Policy,2014,73:676-685.
[15]KRIEGLER E,RIAHI K,BAUER N,et al.Making or breaking climate targets:The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy[J].Technological Forecasting&Social Change,2015,90:24-44.
[16]KALKUHL M,EDENHOFER O,LESSMANNK.Learning or lock-in:Optimal technology policies to support mitigation[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2011(01):01-23.
[17]SIEGMEIER J,MATTAUCH L,FRANKS M,et al.The fiscal benefits of stringent climate change mitigation:an overview[J].Climate Policy,2017(04):352-367.
[18]CUI L B,FAN Y,ZHU L,et al.How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020carbon intensity reduction target?[J].Applied Energy,2014,136:1043-1052.
[19]MO J L,AGNOLUCCI P,JIANG M R,et al.The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme(ETS)on low carbon energy(LCE)investment[J].Energy Policy,2016,89:271-283.
[20]ALBEROLA E,CHEVALLIER J,CHEZE B.Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007[J].Energy Policy,2007(02):787-797.
[21]CHEVALLIER J.Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors:A view from the EU ETS[J].Energy Economics,2009(04):614-625.
[22]KOSO N,CORBERA E.Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism[J].Ecological E-conomics,2009(06):1228-1236.
[23]THOMAS S,DARGUSCH P,STEVE S,et al.Why are there so few afforestation and reforestation Clean Development Mechanism projects?[J].Land Use Policy,2010(03):880-887.
[24]DUAN H B,ZHU L,FAN Y.Optimal carbon taxes in carbon-constrained China:A logistic-induced energy economic hybrid model[J].Energy,2014,69:345-356.
(1)《京都议定书》,https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1998/09/19980921%2004-41%20PM/Ch_XXVII_07_ap.pdf.
(2)附件一国家(1998年修订)是指签署《京都议定书》的所有国家与集团:澳大利亚、奥地利、白俄罗斯、比利时、保加利亚、加拿大、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、丹麦、爱沙尼亚、欧洲经济共同体、芬兰、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、冰岛、爱尔兰、意大利、日本、拉脱维亚、列支敦士登、立陶宛、卢森堡、摩纳哥、荷兰、新西兰、挪威、波兰、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、俄罗斯联邦、斯洛伐克、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士、乌克兰、英国、美国。
(3)ICAP《2018年度全球碳市场进展报告》,http://www.huanjing100.com/p-3977.html.
(4)IPCC第四次评估报告,http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf.
(5)《国务院关于加快培育和发展战略性新兴产业的决定》,http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-10/18/content_1724848.htm.
(6)《关于开展碳排放权交易试点工作的通知》,http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201201/t20120113_456506.html.