孕产妇并发下肢深静脉血栓的护理及预防研究
|
摘要
目的探究孕产妇并发下肢深静脉血栓的护理方法及预防效果。方法将2017年3月—2018年3月该院妇产科接收的120名孕产妇纳入研究对象范畴,结合孕产妇个人意愿将所有孕产妇划分为各组60名的对照组及观察组;对照组孕产妇实行常规护理,观察组孕产妇实行预防护理干预,对比2组孕产妇的DVT发生率及护理满意度。结果对比统计结果发现,对照组DVT发生率为23.33%与观察组5.00%相比二者差异较为明显,2组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对比统计结果发现,对照组护理满意度为76.67%与观察组95.00%相比二者差异较为明显,2组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论孕产妇实行护理干预的效果良好,能有效预防下肢深静脉血栓,大大提高护理满意度,取得令人满意的护理效果,值得在临床护理领域中使用推广。
Objective To explore the nursing methods and preventive effects of deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs in pregnant and lying-in women. Methods 120 pregnant and lying-in women from March 2017 to March 2018 were included in the study. All pregnant and lying-in women were divided into control group and observation group according to their personal wishes. The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given preventive nursing intervention. The incidence of DVT and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the observation group, the incidence of DVT in the control group was 23.33% and that in the observation group was5.00%. There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The results showed that the satisfaction rate of nursing in the control group was 76.67% and that in the observation group was 95.00%. There was significant difference between the two groups(P <0.05). Conclusion The effect of nursing intervention for pregnant and lying-in women is good. It can effectively prevent deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs, greatly improve nursing satisfaction, and achieve satisfactory nursing effect. It is worth popularizing in the field of clinical nursing.
Objective To explore the nursing methods and preventive effects of deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs in pregnant and lying-in women. Methods 120 pregnant and lying-in women from March 2017 to March 2018 were included in the study. All pregnant and lying-in women were divided into control group and observation group according to their personal wishes. The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given preventive nursing intervention. The incidence of DVT and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the observation group, the incidence of DVT in the control group was 23.33% and that in the observation group was5.00%. There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The results showed that the satisfaction rate of nursing in the control group was 76.67% and that in the observation group was 95.00%. There was significant difference between the two groups(P <0.05). Conclusion The effect of nursing intervention for pregnant and lying-in women is good. It can effectively prevent deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs, greatly improve nursing satisfaction, and achieve satisfactory nursing effect. It is worth popularizing in the field of clinical nursing.
引文
[1]王健,姚绍鑫,赵婷婷.围生期护理对预防剖宫产下肢深静脉血栓及心理的影响分析[J].心理月刊,2018(4):33-34.
[2]陈丽.围产期护理干预对预防剖宫产下肢深静脉血栓的作用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(8):93-93.
[3]谢瑞莉.围产期护理干预对预防剖宫产下肢深静脉血栓的作用[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(S1):262-263.
[4]项君艳,王晓一,周仲丽.无剖宫产指征孕产妇行剖宫产现状与影响因素探究[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(24):14-16.
[5]李新.针对性护理降低剖宫产患者术后寒颤的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(6):216-217.
[6]程晓芳,安丰玲.剖宫产后再次分娩产妇临床分析及对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(22),26-28.
[2]陈丽.围产期护理干预对预防剖宫产下肢深静脉血栓的作用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(8):93-93.
[3]谢瑞莉.围产期护理干预对预防剖宫产下肢深静脉血栓的作用[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(S1):262-263.
[4]项君艳,王晓一,周仲丽.无剖宫产指征孕产妇行剖宫产现状与影响因素探究[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(24):14-16.
[5]李新.针对性护理降低剖宫产患者术后寒颤的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(6):216-217.
[6]程晓芳,安丰玲.剖宫产后再次分娩产妇临床分析及对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(22),26-28.