中国淘汰短链氯化石蜡的社会经济影响评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Socio-economic Impact Assessment of Phasing out SCCPs in China
  • 作者:余梦琪 ; 王梓元 ; 王滢 ; 徐淳 ; 张剑波
  • 英文作者:YU Mengqi;WANG Ziyuan;WANG Ying;XU Chun;ZHANG Jianbo;Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality,State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control,College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering,Peking University;Foreign Economic Cooperation Office,Ministry of Environmental Protection;
  • 关键词:短链氯化石蜡 ; 社会经济影响评价 ; 成本效益分析
  • 英文关键词:SCCPs;;socio-economic impact assessment;;cost benefit analysis
  • 中文刊名:BJDZ
  • 英文刊名:Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
  • 机构:北京大学环境科学与工程学院区域环境质量协同创新中心环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室;环境保护部环境保护对外合作中心;
  • 出版日期:2017-07-05 09:46
  • 出版单位:北京大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.53;No.282
  • 基金:环保公益性行业科研专项(201209020)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:BJDZ201704011
  • 页数:5
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-2442/N
  • 分类号:117-121
摘要
利用成本效益分析法,设置5年和10年淘汰情景,对中国淘汰短链氯化石蜡(SCCPs)的成本和效益进行分析。淘汰SCCPs的成本为181.1~308.8亿元,主要来自下游行业替代损失,5年淘汰情景的成本低于10年淘汰情景;中国淘汰SCCPs的收益为1462.6亿元,建议采用5年淘汰情景淘汰SCCPs。
        The costs and benefits of phasing out short chain chlorinated paraffins(SCCPs) in China were analyzed under the 5-year and 10-year control scenarios by cost benefit analysis. The cost of phasing out SCCPs was 18.11 to 30.88 billion yuan, mainly from the substitution in downstream industries. The cost under the 5-year control scenario was less than the 10-year scenario. The benefit of phasing out SCCPs in China was 146.26 billion yuan. The 5-year control scenario was suggested for phasing out SCCPs.
引文
[1]王琰,朱浩霖,李琦路,等.环境中氯化石蜡的研究进展.科技导报,2012,30(22):68–72
    [2]王亚韡,蔡亚岐,江桂斌.斯德哥尔摩公约新增持久性有机污染物的一些研究进展.中国科学:化学,2010,53(2):99–123
    [3]IARC.Summaries and evaluations:chlorinated paraffins(Group 2B),International Agency for Research on Cancer.1990,48:55
    [4]Tomy G,Stern G,Lockhart W et al.Occurrence of C10–C13 polychlorinated n-alkanes in Canadian midlatitude and arctic lake sediments.Environmental Science&Technology,1999,33:2858–2863
    [5]Reth M,Zencak Z,Oehme M.First study of congener group patterns and concentrations of short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in fish from the North and Baltic Sea.Chemosphere,2005,58:847–854
    [6]Reth M,Ciric A,Christensen G N,et al.Short-and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in biota from the European Arctic—differences in homologue group patterns.Science of the Total Environment,2006,367:252–260
    [7]Official Journal of the European Union.Amending Regulation(EC)No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants as regards Annex I[EB/OL].(2015–11–14)[2016–02].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R2030&qid=1456368165695&from=EN
    [8]李艳.纺织染整助剂中短链氯化石蜡的检测技术研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2014
    [9]陈,王亚韡,王璞,等.短链氯化石蜡在台州电子拆解地区的分布特征.环境化学,2014,33(6):873–879
    [10]徐淳,徐建华,张剑波.中国短链氯化石蜡排放清单和预测.北京大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(2):369–378
    [11]OECD.Framework for integrating socio-economic analysis in chemical risk management decisionmaking.2000:ENV/JMMONO-2000-5
    [12]Broomfield M,Whiting R,Lupi V,et al.Costs and benefits of the addition of hexabromocyclododecane(HBCD)to the stockholm convention and the 1998POPs protocols.London:AEA Technology plc,2010
    [13]朱建新,胡新涛.中国持久性有机污染物废弃库存项目环境效益分析//持久性有机污染物论坛2009暨持久性有机污染物全国学术研讨会.宁波,2009:229-230
    [14]徐淳.中国短链氯化石蜡清单和淘汰影响[D].北京:北京大学,2013
    [15]廖虹云.硫丹生产企业周边污染状况及人体健康风险初步评价研究[D].北京:北京大学,2012
    [16]赵子鹰.中国滴滴涕淘汰情景分析与选择[D].北京:北京大学,2004
    [17]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴.北京:中国统计出版社,2015
    [18]边策,姜延书,丁乐臣.淘汰含DDT防污漆及替代品社会经济影响评估及建议.金融经济,2008(18):103–104
    [19]彭志龙.中国投入产出表.北京:中国统计出版社,2009
    [20]石玲,马炜,孙玉军,等.基于游客支付意愿的生态补偿经济价值评估:以武汉素山寺国家森林公园为例.长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):180–188
    [21]江苏省统计局.江苏统计年鉴.北京:中国统计出版社,2015

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700