基于视觉-前庭感知一致性的运动模拟可信度评价方法
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Credibility Evaluation of Motion Simulation Based on Visual-vestibular Perception Coherence
  • 作者:陈炜 ; 王珺珺 ; 熊颖 ; 浣上 ; 晁建刚
  • 英文作者:Chen Wei;Wang Junjun;Xiong Ying;Huan Shang;Chao Jiangang;National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering,China Astronaut Research and Training Center;
  • 关键词:感知一致性 ; 运动模拟 ; 可信度评价
  • 英文关键词:perception coherence;;motion simulation;;credibility evaluation
  • 中文刊名:HYXB
  • 英文刊名:Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
  • 机构:中国航天员科研训练中心人因工程重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2017-02-15
  • 出版单位:航天医学与医学工程
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.30
  • 基金:中国航天医学工程预先研究项目(2013SY54B1301);; 中国航天员中心飞天基金(FTKY201302);; 重点实验室预研基金(9140C770102140C77004)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HYXB201701011
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-2774/R
  • 分类号:69-75
摘要
目的提出以运动感知一致性作为运动模拟的可信度评价标准。方法以客观运动模拟测试(objective motion cueing test,OMCT)为基础,引入了视觉-前庭感知一致性理论,并以人的运动感知一致区为期望边界,从而修正运动模拟可信度评价函数。结果相比Advani-Hosman评价标准,本方法可获得更大的幅值可信度与相位可信度区域,扩大了运动模拟的边界。结论运动感知一致性更适合作为飞行训练运动模拟的可信度评价指标。
        Objective The motion perception coherence is proposed as a new criterion for the credibility evaluation of motion simulation. Methods Based on the objective motion cueing test( OMCT),the theory of visualvestibular perception coherence was introduced,and the coherence zone of perception was applied as the expected boundary,which was then used to revise the cost function of credibility evaluation. Results Compared with the Advani-Hosman evaluation criterion,the proposed method increased the credible zones of amplitude and phase,and consequently broadened the boundaries of motion simulation. Conclusion Motion perception coherence is more reasonable to be the evaluation criterion for motion simulation in the flight training.
引文
[1]Advani SK,Hosman RJAW,Potter M.Objective motion fidelity qualification in flight training simulators[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Hilton Head,South Carolina,2007.
    [2]Seehof C,Durak U,Duda H.Objective motion cueing test:experiences of a new user[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Boston,2013:75-88.
    [3]Advani SK,Hosman RJAW.Revising civil simulator standards-an opportunity for technological pull[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Keystone,Colorado,2006.
    [4]Stroosma O,van Paassen MM,Mulder M,et al.Applying the objective motion cueing test to a classical washout algorithm[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies(MST)Conference,Boston,2013.
    [5]Roza M,Meiland R,Field J.Experiences and perspectives in using OMCT for testing and optimizing motion drive algorithms[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies(MST)Conference,Boston,2013.
    [6]Hosman RJAW,Advani SK.Status of the ICAO objective motion cueing test[C]//Flight Simulation Research,New Frontiers Conference Proceedings,Royal Aeronautical Society,London,2012.
    [7]Zaal PMT,Schroeder JA,Chung WW.Objective motion cueing criteria investigation based on three flight tasks[C].Challenges in Flight Simulation,London,2015.
    [8]Hosman R,Advani S.Design and evaluation of the objective motion cueing test and criterion[J].The Aeronautical Journal,2016,120(1227):873-891.
    [9]Baron S,Lancraft R,Zacharias G.Pilot/vehicle model analysis of visual and motion cue requirements in flight simulation[R].NASA Contractor Report 3312,1980.
    [10]Pool DM,Mulder M,Paassen MMV,et al.Effects of peripheral visual and physical motion cues in roll-axis tracking tasks[J].Journal of Guidance Control&Dynamics,2008,31(6):1608-1622.
    [11]Van der Steen FAM.Self-motion perception[D].Delft University of Technology,Faculty of Aerospace Engineering,1998.
    [12]Grácio BJC,Bos JE,Van Paassen MM,et al.Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues[J].Experimental Brain Research,2014,232(2):637-646.
    [13]Valente Pais AR,Van Paassen MM,Mulder M,et al.Perception coherence zones in flight simulation[J].Journal of Aircraft,2010,47(6):2039-2048.
    [14]Correia Gracio BJ,Valente Pais AR,Van Paassen MM,et al.Relationship between optimal gain and coherence zone in flight simulation[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Portland,OR,2011.
    [15]Valente Pais AR.Perception coherence zones in vehicle simulation[M].TU Delft,Delft University of Technology,2013.
    [16]陈炜,晁建刚.基于人感理论的航天飞行训练模拟技术研究[J].航天医学与医学工程,2014,27(3):223-229.Chen W,Chao JG.Research on spaceflight training simulation technology based on human perception theory[J].Space Medicine&Medical Engineering,2014,27(3):223-229.
    [17]Grant PR,Lee PTS.Motion-visual phase-error detection in a Flight Simulator[J].Journal of Aircraft,2007,44(3):927-935.
    [18]Jonik PM,Valente Pais AR,van Paassen MM,et al.Phase Coherence Zones in Flight Simulation[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Portland,OR,8-11August 2011,AIAA 2011-6555.
    [19]Correia Gracio BJ,Bos JE,Wentink M,et al.Perceived mismatch between visual and inertial cues in a simulation environment[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Minneapolis,Minnesota,13-16 August 2012.AIAA 2012-5011.
    [20]Pais ARV,GrOcio BJC,Kelly LC,et al.Comparison of flight simulators based on human motion perception metrics[R].NASA/TM-2015-218681,2015.
    [21]Correia Grácio BJ.The Effects of specific force on self-motion perception in a simulation environment[M].TU Delft,Delft University of Technology,2013.
    [22]Heerspink HM,Berkouwer WR,Stroosma O,et al.Evaluation of vestibular thresholds for motion detection in the SIMONA research simulator[C]//AIAA Modeling and Simulation Conference,2005,San Francisco,California.
    [23]Notations A,Sub-indices B.Evaluating an objective method for motion cueing fidelity[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit,Honolulu,Hawaii,2008.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700