摘要
回顾清末民国时期一些关键语篇,审视当时的学术环境、时人如何看待国学与西学的关系等,以此理解当时关于国学诸种问题的探讨;梳理"整理国故"运动代表的时代意义、清华国学研究院兼采中西的发展方式,以之为鉴,关照当今国学在学术研究领域内的发展问题、国学人才培养问题;分析当今"国学热"背后的社会情绪,以及作为现代学科语境下的国学,该如何证明自身的存在及其意义。
The essay is to review the essential texts by examining the academic environment in the period of the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, and to compare the scholars' views on the relationship between Chinese and Western learning, so as to understand the discussion on Chinese learning. Then the essay tries to tease the era of significance of the Movement for Rearranging the National Heritage, and the development style of the Academy of Chinese learning, Tsinghua. It can be helpful of the academic research of Chinese learning and the cultivation of talents. Lastly, the social emotion behind "traditional culture craze" is analyzed, so is the significance of Chinese learning in the context of modern discipline.
引文
[1]陈来.近代“国学”观念的发生与演变[N].人民政协报,2016-05-30(11).
[2]黄玉顺.中国学术从“经学”到“国学”的时代转型[J].中国哲学史,2012(1):119.
[3]闻一多.论振兴国学[J].清华周刊,1916(77).
[4]胡适.《国学季刊》发刊宣言[J].国学季刊,1923(1):1.
[5]王国维.《国学丛刊》序[J].国学丛刊,1911(1):1.
[6]黄遵宪.黄遵宪集:下卷[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2003:495.
[7]王廷相.王廷相集[M].北京:中华书局,1989:809.
[8]萧公弼.科学国学并重论[J].学生杂志,1915(4).
[9]梁启超.读书指南[M].北京:中华书局,2010:173.
[10]桑兵.近代中国学术的地缘与流派[J].历史研究,1999(3):39.
[11]朱洪斌.清华国学研究院的学术建制及治学精神[J].史学史研究,2012(3):70.
[12]罗志田.一次宁静的革命:清华国学院的独特追求[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(2).
[13]邓实.《国学讲习记》序[J].国粹学报,1906(19):51.
[14]梁涛,孙劲松.国魂之学与学科之学[N].光明日报,2014-11-04(11).
(1)此语出自朱宗熹致邵力子的信,参见曹聚仁《审订国学之反响》,《民国日报·觉悟》,1923年5月29日。