常见绿化树种对土壤碳氮垂直分布及有机碳储量的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of common urban tree species on vertical distribution of soil carbon & nitrogen and organic carbon storage
  • 作者:袁在翔 ; 金雪梅 ; 翟凯燕 ; 陈斌 ; 关庆伟 ; 徐建峰
  • 英文作者:YUAN Zaixiang;JIN Xuemei;ZHAI Kaiyan;CHEN Bin;GUAN Qingwei;XU Jianfeng;Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Biology and the Environment,Nanjing Forestry University;Taicang Forestry Station of Jiangsu Province;
  • 关键词:水杉 ; 香樟 ; 重阳木 ; 农田 ; 土壤有机碳 ; 全氮
  • 英文关键词:Metasequoia glyptostroboides;;Cinnamomum camphora;;Bischofia polycarpa;;farmland;;soil organic carbon;;total nitrogen
  • 中文刊名:NJLY
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
  • 机构:南方现代林业协同创新中心南京林业大学生物与环境学院;太仓市林业站;
  • 出版日期:2018-01-03 16:25
  • 出版单位:南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.42;No.195
  • 基金:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2015BAD07B00);; 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NJLY201803022
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:32-1161/S
  • 分类号:157-162
摘要
【目的】调查常见绿化树种各立地土壤层次有机碳含量、全氮含量及有机碳储量等相关指标,分析树种差异对城市森林土壤碳氮垂直分布及有机碳储量的影响,为城市绿化树种的选择提供基础数据。【方法】以邻近农田相关指标为对照,测定分析了水杉、香樟、重阳木纯林下各土壤层次的有机碳含量、全氮含量及有机碳储量。【结果】(1)不同绿化树种纯林立地土壤有机碳、全氮含量存在一定差异,其变化范围分别为7.28~10.78、1.03~1.43 g/kg,均为重阳木林地土壤的含量最高;各纯林土壤C/N的波动范围为4.78~9.56,水杉与重阳木之间差异显著。(2)各绿化树种纯林0~60 cm土壤有机碳储量变化范围在60.54~89.61 t/hm2之间,大小顺序为:重阳木>香樟>水杉。(3)试验地土壤有机碳含量与全氮含量之间存在显著或极显著的正相关关系。土壤有机碳、全氮含量主要与黏粒百分含量呈显著或极显著的正相关,与土壤密度呈显著或极显著的负相关。(4)造林后第7年森林土壤有机碳、全氮含量与有机碳储量均显著减少,各树种土壤C/N变化明显。其中,香樟、重阳木林地更接近于农田。【结论】在农田转为林地初期,土壤有机碳含量、全氮含量、有机碳储量均有不同程度减少,而落叶阔叶树种重阳木较其他绿化树种更有利于土壤有机碳恢复及固持。
        【Objective】This study aimed to evaluate the effects of urban tree species on the vertical distribution of carbon and nitrogen and soil organic carbon storage,generating basic data for use in the selection of urban tree species in afforestation.【Method】Soil organic carbon( SOC) and total nitrogen( TN) contents,as well as SOC storage at different soil depths were determined under urban monoculture stands of three tree species( i. e.,Metasequoia glyptostroboides,Cinnamomum camphora and Bischofia polycarpa). These indices were compared with those of the nearby farmland.【Result】(1) SOC and TN contents under tree stands were species specific,they varied from 7. 28 to 10. 78 g/kg and from1. 03 to 1. 43 g/kg,respectively,and were significantly higher under B. polycarpa stand than that under M. glyptostroboides and C. camphora stands. Throughout the three stands,soil C/N ratio varied from 4.78 to 9.56,and significantly differed between M. glyptostroboides and B. polycarpa.(2) SOC storage was also species specific,ranging from 60. 54 to89. 61 t/hm2 among the stands( B. polycarpa > C. camphora > M. glyptostroboides).(3) There was a significantly positive correlation between SOC and TN contents at all sites. In addition,SOC and TN contents were significantly positively correlated with clay content,but negatively correlated with soil bulk density.(4) SOC content,TN content and SOC storage were significantly lower under M. glyptostroboides,C. camphora and B. polycarpa stands compared to those in the farmland; the soil C/N ratio was significantly different between the tree stands and the farmland in the 7 thyear afterafforestation. Compared to that under M. glyptostroboides stand,the soil C/N ratio value under C. camphora and B. polycarpa stands,was much closer to that under farmland.【Conclusion】Overall,the SOC and TN contents,as well as SOC storage decreased at different rates during the early period of conversion of farmland to forest. This study showed that B.polycarpa,a broadleaf tree species,is more suitable for the early recovery and sequestration of SOC in response to land use change,compared with other urban species.
引文
[1]SIX J,CALLEWAERT P,LENDERS S,et al.Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2002,66(6):1981-1987.DOI:10.2136/sssaj2002.1981.
    [2]HUANG L,LIU J,SHAO Q,et al.Carbon sequestration by forestation across China:past,present,and future[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2012,16(2):1291-1299.DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.004.
    [3]王薪琪,王传宽,韩轶.树种对土壤有机碳密度的影响:5种温带树种同质园试验[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(11):1033-1043.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0100.WANG X Q,WANG C K,HAN Y.Effects of tree species on soil organic carbon density:a common garden experiment of five temperate tree species[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2015,39(11):1033-1043.
    [4]GUMESA G A,SCHMIDT I K,GUNDERSEN P,et al.Soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen retention traits of four tree species grown in common gardens[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2013,309(12):47-57.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.015.
    [5]VESTERDAL L,CLARKE N,SIGURDSSON B D,et al.Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests?[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2013,309(12):4-18.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.017.
    [6]王成,彭镇华.关于城市绿化建设中增加生物多样性问题[J].城市发展研究,2004,11(3):32-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2004.03.007.WANG C,PENG Z H.Discuss on increasing biodiversity in urban greening[J].Urban Studies,2004,11(3):32-36.
    [7]王会霞,石辉,李秧秧.城市绿化植物叶片表面特征对滞尘能力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3077-3082.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0432.WANG H X,SHI H,LI Y Y.Relationships between leaf surface characteristics and dust-capturing capability of urban greening plant species[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2010,21(12):3077-3082.
    [8]巴成宝,梁冰,李湛东.城市绿化植物减噪研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2012,25(5):40-46.DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2012.05.012.BA C B,LIANG B,LI Z D.Research progress of noise reduction by urban greening plants[J].World Forestry Research,2012,25(5):40-46.
    [9]王光华.北京森林植被固碳能力研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.WANG G H.Carbon sequestrationcapability of forest vegetation in Beijing[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2012.
    [10]葛之葳,周丹燕,郝雨杉,等.徐州城市绿地乔木层碳储量现状分析[J].林业科技开发,2013,27(6):30-34.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2013.06.008.GE Z W,ZHOU D Y,HAO Y S,et al.Analysis on the present carbon stocks of the arbors layer in urban green spaces in Xuzhou[J].China Forestry Science and Technology,2013,27(6):30-34.
    [11]VESTERDAL L,SCHMIDT I K,CALLESEN I,et al.Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255(1):35-48.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.015.
    [12]DE VRIES W I M,REINDS G J,GUNDERSEN P E R,et al.The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration in European forests and forest soils[J].Global Change Biology,2006,12(7):1151-1173.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01151.x.
    [13]WANG X,WANG J,ZHANG J.Comparisons of three methods for organic and inorganic carbon in calcareous soils of northwestern China[J].Plo S One,2012,7(8):e44334.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044334.
    [14]王棣,耿增超,佘雕,等.秦岭典型林分土壤有机碳储量及碳氮垂直分布[J].生态学报,2015,35(16):5421-5429.DOI:10.5846/stxb201311032655.WANG D,GENG Z C,SHE D,et al.Soil organic carbon storage and vertical distribution of carbon and nitrogen across different forest types in the Qinling Mountains[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(16):5421-5429.
    [15]SPRINGOB G,KIRCHMANN H.Bulk soil C to N ratio as a simple measure of net N mineralization from stabilized soil organic matter in sandy arable soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2003,35(4):629-632.DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00052-X.
    [16]许晓静.不同环境下几种园林树木落叶分解及N、P动态的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2007.XU X J.Leaf litter decomposition and N,P dynamics of several urban trees in different environments[D].Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University,2007.
    [17]RASSE D P,RUMPEL C,DIGNAC M F.Is soil carbon mostly root carbon?Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation[J].Plant and Soil,2005,269(1-2):341-356.DOI:10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y.
    [18]张小全,吴可红.森林细根生产和周转研究[J].林业科学,2001,37(3):126-138.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2001.03.021.ZHANG X Q,WU K H.Fine-root production and turnover for forest ecosystems[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2001,37(3):126-138.
    [19]刘艳,汪思龙,王晓伟,等.不同温度条件下杉木、桤木和火力楠细根分解对土壤活性有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(3):481-486.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2007.03.003.LIU Y,WANG S L,WANG X W,et al.Effects of tree species fine root decomposition on soil active organic carbon[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(3):481-486.
    [20]陈龙池,廖利平,汪思龙,等.根系分泌物生态学研究[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(6):57-62.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2002.06.013.CHEN L C,LIAO L P,WANG L S,et al.A review for research of root exudates ecology[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2002,21(6):57-62.
    [21]王姣龙,谌小勇,闫文德,等.4种绿化树种根系分泌物中的化学成分分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(10):107-113.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2016.10.015.WANG J L,CHEN X Y,YAN W D,et al.Chemical components of root exudates from four urban greening tree species[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition),2016,44(10):107-113.
    [22]张春华,王宗明,居为民,等.松嫩平原玉米带土壤碳氮比的时空变异特征[J].环境科学,2011,32(5):1407-1414.DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.05.014.ZHANG C H,WANG Z M,JU W M,et al.Spatial and temporal variability of soil C/N ratio in Songnen Plain maize belt[J].Environmental Science,2011,32(5):1407-1414.
    [23]WANG H,LIU S R,MO J M,et al.Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China[J].Ecological Research,2010,25(6):1071-1079.DOI:10.1007/s11284-010-0730-2.
    [24]史利江,郑丽波,梅雪英,等.上海市不同土地利用方式下的土壤碳氮特征[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(9):2279-2287.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0325.SHI L J,ZHENG L B,MEI X Y,et al.Characteristics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen under different land use types in Shanghai[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2010,21(9):2279-2287.
    [25]王春梅,刘艳红,邵彬,等.量化退耕还林后土壤碳变化[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(3):112-119.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2007.03.018.WANG C M,LIU Y H,SHAO B,et al.Quantifying the soil carbon changes following the afforestation of former arable land[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2007,29(3):112-119.
    [26]SIX J,CONANT R T,PAUL E A,et al.Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter:implications for C-saturation of soils[J].Plant and Soil,2002,241(2):155-176.DOI:10.1023/A:1016125726789.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700