友好型生猪养殖集成技术试验报告
|
摘要
本试验根据猪舍结构形式不同,分别设计试验组A、对照组B、对照组C、对照组D,结合快速育肥猪技术、母猪繁育技术、猪疾病防控技术,对繁育母猪和育肥猪分别进行饲养对比试验。试验结果表明:试验组A的繁育母猪生产水平和育肥猪生产性能都明显高于对照组B、C、D,差异显著(P<0.05),尤其是试验组A,具有良好的经济效益和社会效益,差异极显著(P<0.01)。为此大力推广友好型生猪养殖集成技术,是发展绿色、环保、无公害、友好型生猪生产的有效途径,对养猪业发展具有重大现实意义。
This experiment according to the hog house structural style, designs experimental group A, control group B, control group C, control group D separately. Combined with the union nurtures the fat pig technology, the sow breeding technology, pig disease fast guards against controls the technology, to breeds the sow and nurtures the fat pig to carry on the raising contrast experiment separately. The test result indicated that, experimental group A, the breeding sow production level and nurtures the fat pig production performance all obviously to be higher than control group B, C, D, the difference obviously(P<0.05). Experiments group A in particular, has the good economic efficiency and the social efficiency, the difference is extremely remarkable(P<0.01). Vigorously promotes the friendly live pig cultivation integration technology for this, is develops the green, the environmental protection, does not have the environmental damage, the friendly live pig production effective way, has the significant practical significance to the pigbreeding industry development.
This experiment according to the hog house structural style, designs experimental group A, control group B, control group C, control group D separately. Combined with the union nurtures the fat pig technology, the sow breeding technology, pig disease fast guards against controls the technology, to breeds the sow and nurtures the fat pig to carry on the raising contrast experiment separately. The test result indicated that, experimental group A, the breeding sow production level and nurtures the fat pig production performance all obviously to be higher than control group B, C, D, the difference obviously(P<0.05). Experiments group A in particular, has the good economic efficiency and the social efficiency, the difference is extremely remarkable(P<0.01). Vigorously promotes the friendly live pig cultivation integration technology for this, is develops the green, the environmental protection, does not have the environmental damage, the friendly live pig production effective way, has the significant practical significance to the pigbreeding industry development.
引文
[1]池跃田,于洪斌,金玉波,等.微生物发酵床养猪不同垫料组合对生长育肥猪生长性能影响的试验[J].现代畜牧兽医,2011,3:49-50.
[2]谢文明,陶向新,孟祥彬,等.辽西地区塑料大棚养猪生态效益研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1989,3:292-299.
[3]李建芬,顾春梅,俞坚群,等.微生物发酵床饲养肉猪对比试验[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2010,1:45-46.
[4]刘波,朱昌雄.微生物发酵床零污染养猪技术研究与应用[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2009:1-347.
[5]黄献超,张秉慧.影响生物发酵床养猪技术推广的因素及对策[J].河南畜牧兽医(综合版),2010,5:42.
[2]谢文明,陶向新,孟祥彬,等.辽西地区塑料大棚养猪生态效益研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1989,3:292-299.
[3]李建芬,顾春梅,俞坚群,等.微生物发酵床饲养肉猪对比试验[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2010,1:45-46.
[4]刘波,朱昌雄.微生物发酵床零污染养猪技术研究与应用[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2009:1-347.
[5]黄献超,张秉慧.影响生物发酵床养猪技术推广的因素及对策[J].河南畜牧兽医(综合版),2010,5:42.