解淀粉芽孢杆菌SC06与肠毒性大肠杆菌K88对IPEC-1细胞转运载体、紧密连接、凋亡和免疫相关基因表达的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 and Escherichia coli K88 on Expression of Genes Related to Transporters,Tight Junctions,Apoptosis and Immunity in IPEC-1 Cells
  • 作者:徐函 ; 曹雪芳 ; 刘容容 ; 曾忠花 ; 汤俐 ; 李卫芬
  • 英文作者:XU Han;CAO Xuefang;LIU Rongrong;ZENG Zhonghua;TANG Li;LI Weifen;Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition of Ministry of Education,Institute of Feed Science,College of Animal Science,Zhejiang University;
  • 关键词:解淀粉芽孢杆菌SC06 ; 肠毒性大肠杆菌K88 ; PEC-1细胞 ; 基因表达 ; 凋亡 ; 炎症反应
  • 英文关键词:Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06;;ETEC K88;;IPEC-1 cell;;gene expression;;apoptosis;;inflammatory response
  • 中文刊名:DWYX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition
  • 机构:浙江大学动物科学学院饲料科学研究所教育部动物分子营养学重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-03 07:01
  • 出版单位:动物营养学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.31
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(31672460,31472128)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DWYX201905033
  • 页数:11
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-5461/S
  • 分类号:314-324
摘要
本试验以IPEC-1细胞为材料,探究解淀粉芽孢杆菌SC06(以下简称SC06)与肠毒性大肠杆菌K88(以下简称K88)对肠上皮屏障功能相关基因表达的影响。将IPEC-1细胞分为4个组并作不同处理:CK组为空白对照,不作处理; SC06组和SC06+K88组用含有108CFU/mL SC06的DM EM/F12培养基先预处理6 h,之后K88组和SC06+K88组加入含有108CFU/mL K88的DM EM/F12培养基处理3 h;乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性测定另设以含1%Trinton X-100的DM EM/F12培养基处理的Trinton组为阳性对照。各组细胞均培养9 h。结果表明:1)与CK组相比,K88和SC06单独处理均显著降低了葡萄糖转运载体2 (GLUT2)和小肽转运载体1(PepT1)基因的相对表达量(P<0.05),SC06单独处理显著增加了丙氨酸/丝氨酸/半胱氨酸/苏氨酸转运载体2(ASCT2)和兴奋性氨基酸转运载体1(EAAC1)基因的相对表达量(P<0.05);与K88单独处理相比,SC06预处理显著抑制了K88诱导的LDH活性和EAAC1基因相对表达量的增加(P<0.05)。2)与CK组相比,K88单独处理显著上调了闭锁小带蛋白-1(ZO-1)、闭合蛋白(occludin)基因的表达(P <0.05),显著下调了密封蛋白(claudin)-3、claudin-4和黏蛋白-1(MUC1)基因的表达(P <0.05); SC06单独处理显著上调了ZO-1、claudin-4基因的表达(P <0.05); K88和SC06单独处理均显著促进了天冬氨酸蛋白水解酶-3(caspase-3)、凋亡相关因子(Fas)及B淋巴细胞瘤-2(Bcl-2)基因的表达(P<0.05),显著抑制了天冬氨酸蛋白水解酶-9(caspase-9)与Bcl-2相关X蛋白(Bax)基因的表达(P<0.05),且K88单独处理还显著降低了天冬氨酸蛋白水解酶-8(caspase-8)基因的表达(P<0.05)。与K88单独处理相比,SC06预处理显著阻止了由K88诱导的ZO-1、caspase-3和Bcl-2基因相对表达量的增加(P<0.05)及claudin-3、claudin-4、MUC1、caspase-9和Bax基因相对表达量的降低(P <0.05)。3)与CK组相比,K88单独处理显著上调了肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)及转化生长因子β(TGF-β)基因的表达(P<0.05),并显著上调了核转录因子-κB-p50(NF-κB-p50)、肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子-6(TRAF-6)、髓样分化因子88(MyD88)、核苷酸结合寡聚域1(NOD-1)及Toll样受体-4(TLR4)基因的表达(P <0. 05); SC06单独处理显著降低了IL-6、NOD1与Toll样受体-6(TLR6)基因的表达(P<0.05),显著上调了TG F-β和MyD88基因的表达(P<0.05)。与K88单独处理相比,SC06预处理显著抑制了由K88导致的MyD88、NOD-1及TLR4基因相对表达量的增加(P<0.05)。综上所述,K88诱导IPEC-1细胞发生炎症反应,破坏肠上皮细胞的完整性,SC06在一定程度上有缓解作用。
        This experiment was undertaken to evaluate the effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06( herein-after referred to as SC06) and Escherichia coli K88( hereinafter referred to as K88) on the expression of genes related to intestinal epithelial barrier function by material of IPEC-1 cells. The IPEC-1 cells were divided into four groups with different treatments: cells in group CK were not treated and used as blank control,while cells in group SC06 and group SC06+K88 were pretreated with DMEM/F12 medium containing 108 CFU/mL SC06 for 6 h,and then cells in group K88 and group SC06+K88 were treated with DMEM/F12 medium containing108 CFU/mL K88 for 3 h. For the determination of dehydrogenase( LDH) activity,cells in group Trinton were treated with DMEM/F12 medium containing 1% Trinton X-100 and used as positive control.Cells in each group were cultured for 9 h. The results showed as follows: 1) compared with group CK,the relative expression levels of glucose transporter 2( GLUT2) and small peptide transporter 1( PepT1) genes were significantly decreased by K88 and SC06 alone treatment( P < 0.05). SC06 alone treatment significantly increased the relative expression levels of alanine/serine/cysteine/threonine transporter 2( ASCT2) and excitatory amino acid transporter 1( EAAC1) genes( P<0.05). Compared with group,SC06 pretreatment significantly suppressed the higher LDH activity as well as the relative expression level of EAAC1 gene induced by K88( P< 0. 05). 2) Compared with group CK,K88 alone treatment significantly upregulated the expression of zonula occludens protein-1( ZO-1) and occludin genes( P<0.05),and significantly downregulated the expression of claudin-3,claudin-4 and mucin 1( MUC1) genes( P<0.05). SC06 alone treatment significantly upregulated the expression of ZO-1 and claudin-4 genes( P<0.05). Both K88 and SC06 alone treatment significantly increased the expression of caspase-3,factor associated suicide( Fas) and B-cell lymphoma-2( Bcl-2)genes( P<0.05),and significantly inhibited the expression of caspase-9 and Bcl-2 associated X protein( Bax)genes( P<0.05). Moreover,K88 alone treatment also significantly decreased the expression of caspase-8 gene( P<0.05). Compared with group K88,the increase expression of ZO-1,caspase-3 and Bcl-2 genes and the decrease expression of claudin-3,claudin-4,MUC1,caspase-9 and Bax genes induced by ETEC K88 were significantly prevented by SC06 pretreatment( P<0.05). 3) Compared with group CK,K88 alone treatment significantly upregulated the expression of tumor necrosis factor α( TNF-α), interleukin-6( IL-6),interleukin-8( IL-8) and transforming growth factor β( TGF-β) genes,and significantly upregulated the expression of nuclear factor κB-p50( NF-κB-p50), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor-6( TRAF-6),myeloid differentiation factor 88( MyD88),nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing protein-1( NOD-1) and Toll like receptor 4( TLR4) genes( P<0.05). SC06 alone treatment significantly reduced the expression of IL-6,NOD-1 and Toll like receptor 6( TLR6) genes( P<0.05),and significantly upregulated the expression of TGF-β and MyD88( P<0.05). Compared with group K88,the increase expression of MyD88,NOD-1 and TLR4 induced by K88 were significantly prevented by SC06 pretreatment( P<0.05).In conclusion,K88 induces IPEC-1 cells inflammatory response and impairs integrity of epithelia,which is alleviated by SC06 to some extent.[Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2019,31( 5) : 2267-2277]
引文
[1]陈清,俞守义,申洪,等.产毒性大肠杆菌的致病机制[J].第一军医大学学报,2003,23(8):826-829.
    [2]李海花,朱琪,王世琼,等.产肠毒素大肠杆菌K88诱导仔猪炎症反应的分子机制[J].中国畜牧兽医,2017,44(1):262-267.
    [3]王磊,吕阳,张越,等.抑制大肠杆菌K88的益生菌体外筛选[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(5):1355-1360.
    [4]朱红梅.产肠毒素性大肠杆菌致病特性及益生菌的筛选与疾病控制研究[D].硕士学位论文.厦门:厦门大学,2006.
    [5]淳泽,何明清.芽孢杆菌对肠道致病菌体外生物拮抗作用的研究[J].四川农业大学学报,1994,12(增刊):627-634.
    [6]周玲,王晓清,刘臻,等.营养素转运载体的研究进展[J].饲料研究,2013(4):18-23.
    [7] ABUDABOS A M,AL-BATSHAN H A,MURSHED M A. Effects of prebiotics and probiotics on the performance and bacterial colonization of broiler chickens[J].South African Journal of Animal Science,2015,45(4):419-428.
    [8] DONG X L,ZHANG N F,ZHOU M,et al.Effects of dietary probiotics on grow th performance,faecal microbiota and serum profiles in w eaned piglets[J].Animal Production Science,2014,54(5):616-621.
    [9] TUFARELLI V,CROVACE A M,ROSSI G,et al.Effect of a dietary probiotic blend on performance,blood characteristics,meat quality and faecal microbial shedding in grow ing-finishing pigs[J]. South African Journal of Animal Science,2017,47(6):875-882.
    [10] CUI Y J,LIU L,DOU X X,et al.Lactobacillus reuteri ZJ617 maintains intestinal integrity via regulating tight junction,autophagy and apoptosis in mice challenged w ith lipopolysaccharide[J].Oncotarget,2017,8(44):77489-77499.
    [11] WANG Y,WU Y P,WANG Y B,et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 alleviates the oxidative stress of IPEC-1 via modulating Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and decreasing ROS production[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2017,101(7):3015-3026.
    [12]杜威,黄琴,付爱坤,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌SC06对环磷酰胺诱导的免疫抑制小鼠免疫功能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2015,51(1):60-64.
    [13] WU Y P,WANG Y,ZOU H,et al.Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 induces autophagy to protect against pathogens in macrophages[J].Frontiers in M icrobiology,2017,8:469.
    [14]杜威,曹雪芳,付爱坤,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌对仔猪生长性能、肠黏膜屏障功能及其相关信号通路的影响[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物微生态学分会第五届第十二次全国学术研讨会论文集.青岛:中国畜牧兽医学会动物微生态学分会,2016:1.
    [15] WANG Y,WU Y P,WANG B K,et al. Effects of probiotic Bacillus as a substitute for antibiotics on antioxidant capacity and intestinal autophagy of piglets[J].AMB Express,2017,7(1):52.
    [16]计坚.解淀粉芽孢杆菌SC06介导猪肠道免疫机理的研究[D].博士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2013.
    [17] DU W,XU H,MEI X,et al. Probiotic Bacillus enhance the intestinal epithelial cell barrier and immune function of piglets[J]. Beneficial M icrobes,2018,9(5):743-752.
    [18] JAHROMI M F,ALTAHER Y W,SHOKRYAZDAN P,et al. Dietary supplementation of a mixture of Lactobacillus strains enhances performance of broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions[J].International Journal of Biometeorology,2016,60(7):1099-1110.
    [19] PAVLOVA I,MILANOVA A,DANOVA S,et al.Enrofloxacin and probiotic lactobacilli influence PepT1and LEAP-2 mRNA expression in poultry[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins,2016,8(4):215-220.
    [20]吴云鹏.植物乳杆菌调节猪肠上皮细胞屏障功能和转运载体的研究[D].博士学位论文.广州:华南农业大学,2016.
    [21]胡艳艳.肠道杯状细胞结构和功能的研究进展[J].国际病理科学与临床杂志,2013,33(5):424-430.
    [22]赵美华,龚陈,楼江明,等.黏蛋白与炎症性肠病关系的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2014,22(27):4100-4106.
    [23] CAPALDO C T,POWELL D N,KALMAN D. Layered defense:how mucus and tight junctions seal the intestinal barrier[J]. Journal of M olecular M edicine,2017,95(9):927-934.
    [24]杨宽民,蒋宗勇,王丽,等.植物乳杆菌对感染大肠杆菌K88幼龄仔猪肠黏膜先天免疫反应的影响[C]//第七届中国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集.郑州:中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会,2014:1.
    [25]杨占清.黏蛋白1、黏蛋白2 mRNA在炎症性肠病大鼠肠黏膜细胞表达规律的研究[D].硕士学位论文.长春:吉林大学,2007.
    [26] LODEMANN U,AMASHEH S,RADLOFF J,et al.Effects of ex vivo infection w ith ETEC on jejunal barrier properties and cytokine expression in probioticsupplemented pigs[J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences,2017,62(4):922-933.
    [27] WANG Z L,WANG L,CHEN Z,et al.In vitro evaluation of sw ine-derived Lactobacillus reuteri:probiotic properties and effects on intestinal porcine epithelial cells challenged w ith enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88[J]. Journal of M olecular Biology,2016,26(6):1018-1025.
    [28] RESTA-LENERT S,BARRETT K E. Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection w ith enteroinvasive Escherichia coli(EIEC)[J].Gut,2003,52(7):988-997.
    [29]高薇,侯微,李伟,等.细胞凋亡机制研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(10):150-156.
    [30] ELMORE S. Apoptosis:a review of programmed cell death[J]. Toxicologic Pathology,2007,35(4):495-516.
    [31]李鹏成.嗜酸乳酸杆菌S-层蛋白拮抗肠道病原菌黏附或入侵宿主细胞机制的研究[D].博士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学,2011.
    [32] TANG Y L,TAN B,XIONG X,et al.Methionine deficiency reduces autophagy and accelerates death in intestinal epithelial cells infected w ith enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli[J]. Amino Acids,2015,47(10):2199-2204.
    [33] SYED H C,DUBREUIL J D.Escherichia coli STb toxin induces apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cell lines[J].Microbial Pathogenesis,2012,53(3/4):147-153.
    [34] MENNIGEN R,NOLTE K,RIJCKEN E,et al.Probiotic mixture VSL#3 protects the epithelial barrier by maintaining tight junction protein expression and preventing apoptosis in a murine model of colitis[J]. American Journal of Physiology:Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology,2009,296(5):G1140-G1149.
    [35]黄鸿眉,程茜.NOD1、NOD2:两个重要的天然免疫胞内识别受体[J].国际免疫学杂志,2006,29(1):23-26.
    [36]李影,陈镜宇,张玲玲,等.肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子参与炎症免疫调节的研究进展[J].中国药理学通报,2015,31(9):1206-1211.
    [37] AKIRA S,TAKEDA K. Toll-like receptor signalling[J].Nature Reviews Immunology,2004,4(7):499-511.
    [38] KERN M,GNZEL D,ASCHENBACH J R,et al.Altered cytokine expression and barrier properties after in vitro infection of porcine epithelial cells w ith enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and probiotic Enterococcus faecium[J]. M ediators of Inflammation,2017,2017:2748192.
    [39] TIAN Z Y,LIU X F,DAI R,et al.Enterococcus faecium HDRsEf1 protects the intestinal epithelium and attenuates ETEC-induced IL-8 secretion in enterocytes[J].Mediators of Inflammation,2016,2016:7474306.
    [40] ZHANG W,ZHU Y H,YANG J C,et al. A selected Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain promotes EGFR-independent Akt activation in an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88-infected IPEC-J2 cell model[J].PLoS One,2015,10(4):e0125717.
    [41]薛俊敬.益生菌对草鱼生长、营养代谢和机体免疫的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南昌:南昌大学,2018.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700