制造企业创新网络与双元性学习——基于垂直、水平创新网络的比较研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Innovation Network of Manufacturing Firms and Learning Ambidexterity:A Comparative Study of Vertical and Horizontal Innovation Networks
  • 作者:齐昕 ; 刘洪 ; 张军
  • 英文作者:QI Xin;LIU Hong;ZHANG Jun;School of Business,Nanjing University;School of Business,Anhui University of Technology;
  • 关键词:垂直创新网络 ; 水平创新网络 ; 探索式学习 ; 利用式学习
  • 英文关键词:vertical innovation network;;horizontal innovation network;;exploratory learning;;exploitation learning
  • 中文刊名:SYJG
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Business Economics
  • 机构:南京大学商学院;安徽工业大学商学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:商业经济与管理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.327
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金重点项目“变革环境下的组织变革及其管理研究”(71832006);; 国家社会科学基金项目“金融支持与创新链深度融合的机制、效应与对策研究”(18BJY225);; 教育部人文社会科学规划项目“中国制造业品牌价值共创模式与实现机制研究”(16YJC630096);; 安徽省软科学项目“创新价值链视阈下安徽品牌价值共创机制研究”(1607a0202069)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SYJG201901004
  • 页数:10
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:33-1336/F
  • 分类号:27-36
摘要
文章将制造企业创新网络分为垂直创新网络和水平创新网络,构建有调节的中介效应模型,探索了两类创新网络对双元性学习的差异化影响机制,揭示了有效提升企业双元性学习的相关创新网络特征。实证研究发现,网络强度主要通过提升网络质量,间接促进双元性学习,且垂直网络的效果优于水平网络。垂直网络规模对双元性学习有正向的直接和间接效应,而水平网络规模对双元性学习的效应均不显著。网络管理能力强化了垂直网络强度对双元性学习的积极影响,弱化了水平网络规模对双元性学习的消极影响。
        This research divided the manufacturing enterprise innovation network into two types: vertical innovation network and horizontal innovation network,built a moderated mediation model,explored the differential influencing mechanism linking two types of innovation networks to learning ambidexterity,and exposed the characteristics of innovative network for improving learning ambidexterity effectively. Through the empirical analysis,it has been found that network strength indirectly promotes learning ambidexterity through improving network quality,and the effect of vertical innovation network is better than that of horizontal innovation network. The vertical network range has direct and indirect positive influence on the learning ambidexterity,but the effect of horizontal network range is not significant. Network management capacity strengthens the positive relationship between the vertical network strength and learning ambidexterity,and weakens the negative influence of the horizontal network range on learning ambidexterity.
引文
[1]彭新敏,郑素丽,吴晓波,等.后发企业如何从追赶到前沿?——双元性学习的视角[J].管理世界,2017(2):142-158.
    [2]KORYAK O,LOCKETT A,HAYTON J,et al. Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity:exploration and exploitation[J].Research Policy,2018,47(2):413-427.
    [3]STADLER C,RAJWANI T,KARABA F. Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma:networks as a new level of analysis[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2014,16(2):172-193.
    [4]舒成利,胡一飞,江旭.战略联盟中的双元学习、知识获取与创新绩效[J].研究与发展管理,2015(6):97-106.
    [5]HUANG C,WANG Y. Evolution of network relations,enterprise learning,and cluster innovation networks:the case of the Yuyao plastics industry cluster[J]. Technology Analysis&Strategic Management,2018,30(2):158-171.
    [6]潘松挺,郑亚莉.网络关系强度与企业技术创新绩效——基于探索式学习和利用式学习的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011(11):1736-1743.
    [7]蔡彬清,陈国宏.链式产业集群网络关系,组织学习与创新绩效研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013(4):126-133.
    [8]窦红宾,王正斌.网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究——利用性学习,探索性学习的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2011(3):15-25.
    [9]ATUAHENE-GIMA K,MURRAY J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development:a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2007,15(2):1-29.
    [10]彭新敏.企业网络对技术创新绩效的作用机制研究:利用性-探索性学习的中介效应[D].杭州:浙江大学管理学院,2009.
    [11]WEI J,ZHOU M,GREEVEN M,et al. Economic governance,dual networks and innovative learning in five Chinese industrial clusters[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2016,33(4):1037-1074.
    [12]TOMLINSON P R. Co-operative ties and innovation:some new evidence for UK manufacturing[J]. Research Policy,2010,39(6):762-775.
    [13]HEIDENREICH S,LANDSPERGER J,SPIETH P. Are innovation networks in need of a conductor? Examining the contribution of network managers in low and high complexity settings[J]. Long Range Planning,2016,49(1):55-71.
    [14]任胜钢,吴娟,王龙伟.网络嵌入与企业创新绩效研究——网络能力的调节效应检验[J].研究与发展管理,2011(3):16-24.
    [15]魏江,郑小勇.关系嵌入强度对企业技术创新绩效的影响机制研究——基于组织学习能力的中介性调节效应分析[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(6):168-180.
    [16]刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度,吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016(1):30-42.
    [17]任胜钢.企业网络能力结构的测评及其对企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].南开管理评论,2010(1):69-80.
    [18]WANG J. Knowledge creation in collaboration networks:effects of tie configuration[J]. Research Policy,2016,45(1):68-80.
    [19]LI Y,ZHANG Y,ZHENG S. Social capital,portfolio management capability and exploratory innovation:evidence from China[J]. Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing,2016,31(6):794-807.
    [20]HAEUSSLER C,PATZELT H,ZAHRA S A. Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms:the moderating effect of technological capabilities[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2012,27(2):217-233.
    [21]付丙海,谢富纪,韩雨卿.创新链资源整合,双元性创新与创新绩效:基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2015(12):176-186.
    [22]REAGANS R,MCEVILY B. Network structure and knowledge transfer:the effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2):240-267.
    [23]XIE X,FANG L,ZENG S. Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance:a FSQCA approach[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(11):5210-5215.
    [24]AHUJA G. Collaboration networks,structural holes,and innovation:a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
    [25]SINGH H,KRYSCYNSKI D,LI X,et al. Pipes,pools,and filters:how collaboration networks affect innovative performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2016,37(8):1649-1666.
    [26]MCFADYEN M A,CANNELLA A A. Social capital and knowledge creation:diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):735-746.
    [27]包凤耐,彭正银.网络能力视角下企业关系资本对知识转移的影响研究[J].南开管理评论,2015(3):95-101.
    [28]RITTER T,GEMNDEN H G. Network competence:its impact on innovation success and its antecedents[J]. Journal of Business Research,2003,56(9):745-755.
    [29]张宝建,孙国强,裴梦丹,等.网络能力,网络结构与创业绩效——基于中国孵化产业的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2015(2):39-50.
    [30]DOVING E,GOODERHAM P N. Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification:the case of small firm accountancy practices[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(8):841-857.
    [31]解学梅,左蕾蕾.企业协同创新网络特征与创新绩效:基于知识吸收能力的中介效应研究[J].南开管理评论,2013(3):47-56.
    [32]陈学光.网络能力,创新网络及创新绩效关系研究[D].杭州:浙江大学管理学院,2007.
    [33]潘松挺,蔡宁.网络关系强度与组织学习:环境动态性的调节作用[J].科学决策,2010(4):48-54.
    [34]WILLIAMS L J,COTE J A,BUCKLEY M R. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work:reality or artifact?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1989,74(3):462-468.
    [35]EDWARDS J R,LAMBERT L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,2007,12(1):1-22.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700