环境行政公益诉讼诉前程序价值的实现
|
摘要
检察院提起环境行政公益诉讼是保护环境公益的有效途径,符合当下我国社会和法治的需要。但是环境行政公益诉讼的前置程序,即检察建议制度仍然存在一定的问题。检察建议的合理性、检察建议履行行为的标准及评价制度的缺失等,导致该制度在实践中出现了价值偏差。通过对检察权与监察权概念及性质的界定,提出通过监察权与检察权二者权力互补这一途径,解决当前环境行政公益诉讼中检察建议在实践中出现的亟待解决的问题。
The procuratorate's introduction of environmental administrative public interest litigation is an effective way to protect environmental public welfare and can meet the needs of today's society and the rule of law. However, the pre-procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation, that is, the prosecutorial suggestion system still had certain problems, which lead to the value deviation of the system in practice. This article mainly proposed the complementary powers of supervision power and procuratorial power by defining the concept and nature of procuratorial power and supervision power, and to solve the problems that need to be solved in practice in the current environmental administrative public interest litigation.
The procuratorate's introduction of environmental administrative public interest litigation is an effective way to protect environmental public welfare and can meet the needs of today's society and the rule of law. However, the pre-procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation, that is, the prosecutorial suggestion system still had certain problems, which lead to the value deviation of the system in practice. This article mainly proposed the complementary powers of supervision power and procuratorial power by defining the concept and nature of procuratorial power and supervision power, and to solve the problems that need to be solved in practice in the current environmental administrative public interest litigation.
引文
[1]应松年.行政法学新论[M].北京:中国方正出版社,1999:541-542.
[2]尤光付.中外监督制度比较[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:141.
[3]张瑜.从“应然”层面解析国家监察体制相关概念及内涵[J].行政法学研究,2017(4):30-38.
[4]佚名.也谈监督、制约和制衡[N].检察日报,2008-05-29(3).
[5]林喆.权力腐败与权力制约[M].2版.济南:山东人民出版社,2012:246.
[6]夏正林.权力制约中的监督与制衡[N].检察日报,2017-02-22(7).
[7]王晓冬,刘亚楠.构建检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼制度[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2016,26(2):9-11+68.
[8]秦前红.困境、改革与出路:从“三驾马车”到国家监察——我国监察体系的宪制思考[J].中国法律评论,2017(1):176-182.
[9]陈冬.监察委员会的设置与检察权的重构[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):58-66.
[10]马誉宁.如何理解监察机关的调查权区别于公安机关、检察机关等的侦查权——12种措施与监察职责相匹配[J].中国纪检监察,2018(10):58.
[2]尤光付.中外监督制度比较[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:141.
[3]张瑜.从“应然”层面解析国家监察体制相关概念及内涵[J].行政法学研究,2017(4):30-38.
[4]佚名.也谈监督、制约和制衡[N].检察日报,2008-05-29(3).
[5]林喆.权力腐败与权力制约[M].2版.济南:山东人民出版社,2012:246.
[6]夏正林.权力制约中的监督与制衡[N].检察日报,2017-02-22(7).
[7]王晓冬,刘亚楠.构建检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼制度[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2016,26(2):9-11+68.
[8]秦前红.困境、改革与出路:从“三驾马车”到国家监察——我国监察体系的宪制思考[J].中国法律评论,2017(1):176-182.
[9]陈冬.监察委员会的设置与检察权的重构[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):58-66.
[10]马誉宁.如何理解监察机关的调查权区别于公安机关、检察机关等的侦查权——12种措施与监察职责相匹配[J].中国纪检监察,2018(10):58.