构建雄安新区整体性治理的微观基础——来自行为科学的洞见
|
摘要
目前,区域发展的理论根基主要建立在理性主义基础上,在一定程度上忽视了实践中各种非理性因素和环境的制约。雄安新区是千年大计、国家大事,需要在京津冀一体化的框架中去谋划发展,对整体性治理提出更高的要求。整体性治理并不是纯粹技术、组织或制度层面的,还是心理、信心和预期方面的,对个体和组织行为的激励与约束同样重要。以雄安新区为例,探索构建区域整体性治理的微观基础,从决策、投入、执行和绩效等层面引入来自行为科学的洞见,可以为雄安新区这座未来之城的发展提供新的启示和参考。
Currently, rationalism is the foundation of regional development theory. However, this ignores the irrational and environmental factors that affect and restrict regional development to some extent. The Xiong'an New Area sits at the center of the triangular area formed by Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei's provincial capital Shijiazhuang. The establishment of Xiong'an New Area is a major historic and strategic choice, which needs to be planned in the framework of beijing-tianjin-hebei integration. Therefore, the governance of Xiong'an New Area needs to be viewed from a new perspective of holistic governance. Holistic governance is not only at the technical, organizational or institutional level, but also involves psychology, confidence and expectation, thus makes it important to motivate and restrain individual and organizational behavior. We take the governance of Xiong'an New Area as an example to explore the microcosmic foundation of regional integrity governance. We apply behavioral insights from the aspects of decision-making, input, execution and performance in order to provide new inspirations and perspectives for the development of Xiong'an new area.
Currently, rationalism is the foundation of regional development theory. However, this ignores the irrational and environmental factors that affect and restrict regional development to some extent. The Xiong'an New Area sits at the center of the triangular area formed by Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei's provincial capital Shijiazhuang. The establishment of Xiong'an New Area is a major historic and strategic choice, which needs to be planned in the framework of beijing-tianjin-hebei integration. Therefore, the governance of Xiong'an New Area needs to be viewed from a new perspective of holistic governance. Holistic governance is not only at the technical, organizational or institutional level, but also involves psychology, confidence and expectation, thus makes it important to motivate and restrain individual and organizational behavior. We take the governance of Xiong'an New Area as an example to explore the microcosmic foundation of regional integrity governance. We apply behavioral insights from the aspects of decision-making, input, execution and performance in order to provide new inspirations and perspectives for the development of Xiong'an new area.
引文
[1]德隆·阿西莫格鲁,詹姆斯·罗宾逊.国家为什么会失败[M].李增刚,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2005:87-88.
[2]OECD. OECD Regions at a Glance 2016[EB/OL].(2016-06-16)[2019-01-17].https://doi.org/10.1787/reg_glance-2016-en.
[3]张成福.走向发展和繁荣的制度基础:雄安新区政府治理的愿景[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(6):70-75.
[4]格里·斯托克.治理的微观基础:改进政府间关系的关键为何是心理学而不是经济学[J].公共行政评论,2010,(2):1-23.
[5]袁年兴,姚建秀.国家治理的微观基础:元身份的线索[J].河南社会科学,2017,(12):72-76.
[6]张璋.复合官僚制:中国政府治理的微观基础[J].公共管理与政策评论,2015,(4):6-14.
[7]简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2006:227-228.
[8]威廉·伊斯特利.经济增长的迷雾:经济学家的发展政策为何失败[M].姜世明,译.北京:中信出版社,2016:109-111.
[9]詹姆斯·C.斯科特.国家的视角———那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅,译.上海:上海三联书店,2016:169.
[10]宣晓伟.地区分化持续,区域发展模式转型任重道远[N].中国经济时报,2017-01-24(A06).
[11]胡鞍钢,杭承政.用“精准激励”激发“我要脱贫”[N].光明日报,2017-08-29(14).
[12]托马斯·R·戴伊.理解公共政策[M].谢明,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:298.
[13]曾凡军.整体性治理:一种压力型治理的超越与替代图式[J].江汉论坛,2013,(2):21-25.
[14]罗伯特·希勒.金融与好的社会[M].束宇,译.北京:中信出版社,2012:69.
[15]LING T. Delivering Joined-up Government in the UK:Dimensions, Issues and Problems[J]. Public Administration,2002, 80(4):615-642.
[16]CARTER B. Using Behavioral Insights to Address Complex Development Challenges[EB/OL].(2017-11-10)[2019-01-17].https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/using-behaviouralinsights-to-address-complex-development-challenges.
[17]乔治·马丁内斯-维斯奎泽,弗朗索瓦·瓦列恩考特.区域发展的公共政策[M].虎森,等,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2013:28-29.
[18]卡斯·桑斯坦.简化:政府的未来[M].陈丽芳,译.北京:中信出版社,2015:236-237.
[19]OECD. Rethinking Regional Development Policy-making[EB/OL].(2018-04-06)[2019-01-17].https://dx.doi.org/10.177/9789264293014-en.
[20]刘蓉,黄洪.行为财政学研究评述[J].经济学动态,2010,(5):131-136.
[21]梁竹苑,刘欢.跨期选择的性质探索[J].心理科学进展,2011,(7):959-966.
[2]OECD. OECD Regions at a Glance 2016[EB/OL].(2016-06-16)[2019-01-17].https://doi.org/10.1787/reg_glance-2016-en.
[3]张成福.走向发展和繁荣的制度基础:雄安新区政府治理的愿景[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(6):70-75.
[4]格里·斯托克.治理的微观基础:改进政府间关系的关键为何是心理学而不是经济学[J].公共行政评论,2010,(2):1-23.
[5]袁年兴,姚建秀.国家治理的微观基础:元身份的线索[J].河南社会科学,2017,(12):72-76.
[6]张璋.复合官僚制:中国政府治理的微观基础[J].公共管理与政策评论,2015,(4):6-14.
[7]简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2006:227-228.
[8]威廉·伊斯特利.经济增长的迷雾:经济学家的发展政策为何失败[M].姜世明,译.北京:中信出版社,2016:109-111.
[9]詹姆斯·C.斯科特.国家的视角———那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅,译.上海:上海三联书店,2016:169.
[10]宣晓伟.地区分化持续,区域发展模式转型任重道远[N].中国经济时报,2017-01-24(A06).
[11]胡鞍钢,杭承政.用“精准激励”激发“我要脱贫”[N].光明日报,2017-08-29(14).
[12]托马斯·R·戴伊.理解公共政策[M].谢明,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:298.
[13]曾凡军.整体性治理:一种压力型治理的超越与替代图式[J].江汉论坛,2013,(2):21-25.
[14]罗伯特·希勒.金融与好的社会[M].束宇,译.北京:中信出版社,2012:69.
[15]LING T. Delivering Joined-up Government in the UK:Dimensions, Issues and Problems[J]. Public Administration,2002, 80(4):615-642.
[16]CARTER B. Using Behavioral Insights to Address Complex Development Challenges[EB/OL].(2017-11-10)[2019-01-17].https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/using-behaviouralinsights-to-address-complex-development-challenges.
[17]乔治·马丁内斯-维斯奎泽,弗朗索瓦·瓦列恩考特.区域发展的公共政策[M].虎森,等,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2013:28-29.
[18]卡斯·桑斯坦.简化:政府的未来[M].陈丽芳,译.北京:中信出版社,2015:236-237.
[19]OECD. Rethinking Regional Development Policy-making[EB/OL].(2018-04-06)[2019-01-17].https://dx.doi.org/10.177/9789264293014-en.
[20]刘蓉,黄洪.行为财政学研究评述[J].经济学动态,2010,(5):131-136.
[21]梁竹苑,刘欢.跨期选择的性质探索[J].心理科学进展,2011,(7):959-966.