论传统价值观与现代法治观的价值冲突:基于100起典型案例的类型化分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：On the Value Conflict between Traditional Values and Modern Concepts of Rule of Law:Based on the Typological Analysis of 100 Typical Cases 作者：马国洋 英文作者：MA Guo-yang;School of Law,Beijing Normal University; 关键词：传统价值观 ; 现代法治观 ; 价值冲突 英文关键词：traditional value;;modern concepts of rule of law;;value conflict 中文刊名：ZJKS 英文刊名：Journal of Hebei North University(Social Science Edition) 机构：北京师范大学法学院; 出版日期：2018-12-06 13:42 出版单位：河北北方学院学报(社会科学版) 年：2018 期：v.34;No.175 语种：中文; 页：ZJKS201806020 页数：5 CN：06 ISSN：13-1415/C 分类号：87-91

摘要

传统价值观与现代法治观冲突的根源在于中西方的价值差异。这种冲突主要表现为私力救济的不同选择、权利和权力的差异认知以及对于"健讼"和"厌讼"的不同观念。传统价值观与现代法治观的冲突是各种因素长时间作用的结果,中国悠久的历史在某种程度上加剧了这种冲突。消弭冲突的关键在于制度本身具有价值、制度得以充分落实以及公民素质的有效提升。
        The conflict between traditional values and modern concepts of rule of law is rooted in the value differences between China and the West.This conflict is mainly manifested in the different choices of private relief,the different perceptions of rights and powers,and the different attitudes towards"litigation"and"litigation weariness".The conflict between traditional values and modern concepts of rule of law is the result of long-term effects of many factors,which is worsened by China's long history to some extent.The key to eliminating conflicts lies in the value of the system itself,the full implementation of the system and the effective improvement of citizens' quality.

引文

[1]老子.道德经[M].长春:吉林文史出版社,2005:41.
    [2]孔子.论语[M].武汉:长江文艺出版社,2014.
    [3]卢梭.社会契约论[M].李平沤,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014:43.
    [4]王结发.制度认同与政治合法性[J].行政与法,2014(5):11-12.
    [5]范能浚.范仲淹全集[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2004:487.
    [6]脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,2011:3498.
    [7]吴英姿.论司法认同:危机与重建[J].中国法学,2016(3):186-206.
    [8]肖明.政府信息公开制度运行状态考察:基于2008年至2010年245份政府信息公开工作年度报告[J].法学,2011(10):78-85.
    [9]北京市第二中级人民法院课题组.提高司法公信力的路径和实现方式研究[J].法律适用,2014(8):108-113.