摘要
基督教神学美学与道家美学都围绕着"不可见性"与"可见性"建立起各自的"象论"。神学美学由"神无定形""道成肉身"到"三位一体"的言说过程,铺开了一条"超验美"的言说道路;道家美学则经由"大象无形""得意忘象"到"三言"的言说过程,走向了"超然美"的路径。比较神学美学与道家美学的"象论",我们能在比较美学的层面上去把握中西文化的内在差异性。
Both Christian theological aesthetics and Taoist aesthetics have established their own"image theory"on "invisibility"and "visibility". Theological aesthetics,from the process of "amorphous form"to"trinity",has opened up a way of"transcendental beauty". Taoist aesthetics has gone through the process of "Meta-image Being Nonbeing","Forgetting the Images after the Attainment of the Idea"to "Three Speechs",and has gone to the path of Detached Beauty. By comparing theological aesthetics with Taoist aesthetics,one can grasp the inherent differences between Chinese and western cultures at the level of comparative aesthetics.
引文
[1]芮欣.道说:从逻各斯到倾空[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[2]张隆溪.道与逻各斯:东西方文学阐释学[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2006.
[3] WALTIN J H,MATTHEWS V H,CHAVALAS M W.旧约圣经背景注释[M].李永明,徐成德,黄枫皓,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2013.
[4]宋旭红.当代西方神学美学思想概览[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
[5]阎国忠.美是上帝的名字:中世纪神学美学[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2003.
[6]姜金元.大象无形:《老子》美学思想与中国文学本体论建构[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010.
[7]王卡点校.老子道德经河上公章句[M].北京:中华书局,1993.
[8]王弼注,楼宇烈校释.老子道德经注校释[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[9]陈鼓应.老子注译及评介[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[10]马克斯·韦伯.韦伯作品集之XI:“古犹太教”[M].康乐,简惠美,译.南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2007.
[11]贾思柏.基督教诠释学浅析[M].纪荣神,译.香港:基道出版社,2008.
[12]朗文.怎样阅读《出埃及记》[M].段素革,译.北京:宗教文化出版社,2010.
[13]杨克勤.庄子与雅各:隐喻生命、遨游天恩[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2012.
[14]赵新林. Image与“象”:中西诗学象论溯源[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[15]陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].香港:中华书局,2007.
[16]楼宇烈校释.王弼集校释[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[17]欧崇敬.庄子与解构主义[M].台北:秀威咨询科技股份有限公司,2010.
[18]王树人.回归原创之思:“象思维”视野下的中国智慧[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2005.
[19]章力生.系统神学:卷二:上帝论[M].香港:宣道出版社,1990.
[20]张洪兴.《庄子》“三言”研究[M].北京:学苑出版社,2011.
[21]王凯.逍遥游:庄子美学的现代阐释[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003.