长江经济带城镇化与生态环境的耦合协调及时空格局研究
|
摘要
文章构建城镇化与生态环境协调发展评价指标体系,基于熵权耦合协调模型,对长江经济带城镇化与生态环境之间的协调程度进行系统研究。研究结果表明:在时间维度上,长江经济带城镇化与生态环境之间的协调性呈现稳步提升态势,但是增长幅度不大,且协调性差,整体处在初级耦合协调区间;在空间维度上,长江经济带城镇化与生态环境之间的协调性由东至西逐渐衰减,且省际差距有增加趋势,东部省(市)为良好耦合协调,中部多数省(市)为初级或中级耦合协调,部分西部地区(贵州省和云南省)处于濒临失调衰退区间;2005年以来,长江经济带城镇化发展滞后于生态环境综合发展水平,2016年除上海、江苏、浙江属于生态环境滞后型外,其余省(市)均为城镇化滞后型。
This paper builds the evaluation index system of coordinated development between urbanization and ecological environment,systematically studies the coordination degree between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on the entropy weight coupling coordination model. The results show that:In the temporal dimension,the coordination between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt has been steadily improved,but the growth rate is not large and the coordination is poor. The whole region is in the primary coupling coordination degree;In the spatial dimension,the coordination between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt is gradually decreasing from east to west,and the gap between provincial-level administrative areas is increasing.The eastern provinces(municipalities)are in good coupling coordination,most of the central provinces(municipalities)are in primary or intermediate coupling coordination,and some of the western regions(Guizhou and Yunnan provinces)are on the verge of maladjustment;The development of urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt has lagged behind the comprehensive development of ecological environment since 2005. In 2016,except Shanghai,Jiangsu and Zhejiang belonging to the eco-environmental lag type,the other provincial-level administrative areas are all the urbanization lag type.
This paper builds the evaluation index system of coordinated development between urbanization and ecological environment,systematically studies the coordination degree between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on the entropy weight coupling coordination model. The results show that:In the temporal dimension,the coordination between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt has been steadily improved,but the growth rate is not large and the coordination is poor. The whole region is in the primary coupling coordination degree;In the spatial dimension,the coordination between urbanization and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt is gradually decreasing from east to west,and the gap between provincial-level administrative areas is increasing.The eastern provinces(municipalities)are in good coupling coordination,most of the central provinces(municipalities)are in primary or intermediate coupling coordination,and some of the western regions(Guizhou and Yunnan provinces)are on the verge of maladjustment;The development of urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt has lagged behind the comprehensive development of ecological environment since 2005. In 2016,except Shanghai,Jiangsu and Zhejiang belonging to the eco-environmental lag type,the other provincial-level administrative areas are all the urbanization lag type.
引文
[1]任梅,程钰,任建兰.山东省城市化与生态环境非协调耦合关系判别及空间类型研究[J].世界地理研究,2016,25(5):58-68.
[2]陈晓红,万鲁河.城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(12):1450-1457.
[3]刘耀彬.区域城市化与生态环境耦合特征及机制:以江苏省为例[J].经济地理,2006,5(3):456-462.
[4]张文婷,温宗国.资源环境约束下中国新型城镇化发展模式研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(5):385-388.
[5]张引,杨庆媛,闵婕.重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(5):817-828.
[6]宋建波,武春友.城市化与生态环境协调发展评价研究——以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].中国软科学,2010(2):78-87.
[7]刘耀彬,李仁东,宋予峰.城市化与城市生态环境关系研究综述与评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(3):55-56.
[8]GROSSMAN G M,KRUEGER A B. Environmental impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement[R].The National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge,1991.
[9]SHAFIK N,BANDYOPADHYAY S. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality:Time Series and Gross-country Evidence[R]. Washington,DC:The World Band,1992.
[10]WALTER A R. Environmental Politics and Policy[M].Washington,DC:Congressional Quarterly Inc,2013.
[11]徐崇正,焦未然.找准新型城镇化与生态环境保护的平衡点[J].改革与战略,2013,29(12):100-104.
[12]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2):211-220.
[13]ASTARAIE-IMAMI M,KAPELAN Z,FU G,et al. Assessing the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2012,112(24):1-9.
[14]崔木花.中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):72-78.
[15]方创琳,杨玉梅.城市化与生态环境交互耦合系统的基本定理[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(1):1-8.
[16]刘超,林晓乐.城镇化与生态环境交互协调行为研究——以黄河三角洲为例[J].华东经济管理,2015,29(7):49-58.
[17]高新才,杨芳.西北地区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调度测度[J].城市问题,2016(12):26-33.
[18]郭庆宾,刘静,王涛.武汉城市圈城镇化生态环境相应的时空演变研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(2):137-143.
[19]RORK R,ROSA E. IPAT and impact:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J].Ecological Economics,2003,46(3):351-365.
[20]郭月婷,徐建刚.基于模糊物元的淮河流域城市化与生态环境系统的耦合协调测度[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1244-1252.
[21]张荣天,焦华富.中国省际城镇化与生态环境的耦合协调与优化探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(7):12-17.
[22]ODUM H T,ODUM E C. Modeling for all Scales:an Introduction to System Simulation[J]. Quarterly Review of Biology,2000(6):2212-2222.
[23]李波,张吉献.中原经济区城镇化与生态环境耦合发展时空差异研究[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(3):143-147.
[24]冯霞,刘新平.中东部城镇化与生态环境压力耦合演变对比分析——以豫苏两省为例[J].江西社会科学,2017(1):80-87.
[25]苏昕,段升森,张淑敏.黄河三角洲地区城镇化与生态环境协调发展关系实证研究[J].东岳论丛,2014,35(10):127-131.
[26]武晓静,杜德斌,肖刚,等.长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(4):490-499.
[27]王维.长江经济带“4E”协调发展时空格局研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(9):1-9.
[28]李晓庆,姜博,初楠臣.城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化耦合协调分析——以我国三大城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(7):983-991.
[29]王宾,杨琛,李群.基于熵权扰动属性模型的新型城镇化质量研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2017,37(12):3137-3145.
[30]SHANNON C E. The mathematical theory of communication,ⅠandⅡ[J]. Bell System Technical Journal,1948,27(3):379-423.
[2]陈晓红,万鲁河.城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(12):1450-1457.
[3]刘耀彬.区域城市化与生态环境耦合特征及机制:以江苏省为例[J].经济地理,2006,5(3):456-462.
[4]张文婷,温宗国.资源环境约束下中国新型城镇化发展模式研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(5):385-388.
[5]张引,杨庆媛,闵婕.重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(5):817-828.
[6]宋建波,武春友.城市化与生态环境协调发展评价研究——以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].中国软科学,2010(2):78-87.
[7]刘耀彬,李仁东,宋予峰.城市化与城市生态环境关系研究综述与评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(3):55-56.
[8]GROSSMAN G M,KRUEGER A B. Environmental impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement[R].The National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge,1991.
[9]SHAFIK N,BANDYOPADHYAY S. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality:Time Series and Gross-country Evidence[R]. Washington,DC:The World Band,1992.
[10]WALTER A R. Environmental Politics and Policy[M].Washington,DC:Congressional Quarterly Inc,2013.
[11]徐崇正,焦未然.找准新型城镇化与生态环境保护的平衡点[J].改革与战略,2013,29(12):100-104.
[12]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2):211-220.
[13]ASTARAIE-IMAMI M,KAPELAN Z,FU G,et al. Assessing the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2012,112(24):1-9.
[14]崔木花.中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调关系[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):72-78.
[15]方创琳,杨玉梅.城市化与生态环境交互耦合系统的基本定理[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(1):1-8.
[16]刘超,林晓乐.城镇化与生态环境交互协调行为研究——以黄河三角洲为例[J].华东经济管理,2015,29(7):49-58.
[17]高新才,杨芳.西北地区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调度测度[J].城市问题,2016(12):26-33.
[18]郭庆宾,刘静,王涛.武汉城市圈城镇化生态环境相应的时空演变研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(2):137-143.
[19]RORK R,ROSA E. IPAT and impact:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J].Ecological Economics,2003,46(3):351-365.
[20]郭月婷,徐建刚.基于模糊物元的淮河流域城市化与生态环境系统的耦合协调测度[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1244-1252.
[21]张荣天,焦华富.中国省际城镇化与生态环境的耦合协调与优化探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(7):12-17.
[22]ODUM H T,ODUM E C. Modeling for all Scales:an Introduction to System Simulation[J]. Quarterly Review of Biology,2000(6):2212-2222.
[23]李波,张吉献.中原经济区城镇化与生态环境耦合发展时空差异研究[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(3):143-147.
[24]冯霞,刘新平.中东部城镇化与生态环境压力耦合演变对比分析——以豫苏两省为例[J].江西社会科学,2017(1):80-87.
[25]苏昕,段升森,张淑敏.黄河三角洲地区城镇化与生态环境协调发展关系实证研究[J].东岳论丛,2014,35(10):127-131.
[26]武晓静,杜德斌,肖刚,等.长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(4):490-499.
[27]王维.长江经济带“4E”协调发展时空格局研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(9):1-9.
[28]李晓庆,姜博,初楠臣.城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化耦合协调分析——以我国三大城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(7):983-991.
[29]王宾,杨琛,李群.基于熵权扰动属性模型的新型城镇化质量研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2017,37(12):3137-3145.
[30]SHANNON C E. The mathematical theory of communication,ⅠandⅡ[J]. Bell System Technical Journal,1948,27(3):379-423.