域外电子数据证据可采性的新发展及启示
|
摘要
电子数据证据可采性是电子数据证据认定中最为棘手,也是目前我国司法实践中颇具争议的一个问题。新修民事诉讼法中正式确立电子数据证据为一种法定证据形式,但遗憾的是只确认了电子数据的证据效力,未对电子数据的可采性及其相关问题作出明确规定。在借鉴有关国家成功经验的基础上,结合我国实践需求及发展程度,应制定包含最佳证据规则、鉴真规则与传闻证据规则的电子数据证据可采性规则。
The admissibility of electronic data evidence is the most complex and one of the controversial issues in legal practice in China. The electronic data evidence is formally confirmed as one of the legal forms of evidence in the newly revised Civil Procedure Law,but it is a pity that the evidential effect of electronic data is confirmed,while the admissibility and related issues of electronic data are not clearly regulated. Based on referencing the successful experiences of other countries,and combined with the practical demand and degree of development,the rules of admissibility should be constituted of best evidence,authentic identification and hearsay evidence.
The admissibility of electronic data evidence is the most complex and one of the controversial issues in legal practice in China. The electronic data evidence is formally confirmed as one of the legal forms of evidence in the newly revised Civil Procedure Law,but it is a pity that the evidential effect of electronic data is confirmed,while the admissibility and related issues of electronic data are not clearly regulated. Based on referencing the successful experiences of other countries,and combined with the practical demand and degree of development,the rules of admissibility should be constituted of best evidence,authentic identification and hearsay evidence.
引文
[1]舍恩·伯格·维克多·迈尔,库克·耶肯尼思.大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革[M].盛杨燕,周涛,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:20.
[2]刘品新.网络时代刑事司法理念与制度的创新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013:198.
[3]汪振林.电子数据分类研究[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2013(3):22-26.
[4]Editor.Lorraine v.Markel American Insurance Company,241 F.R.D.534,546(D.M d.M ay 4,2007)[EB/OL].[2016-08-06].http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Opinions/Lorraine%20v.%20M arkel%20-%20ESIADM ISSIBILITY%20OPINION.pdf.
[5]Wendy L.A commentary on the amendments to the electronic evidence:provisions in the Singapore Evidence Act[M].Singapore:Law Gazette,2012:18.
[6]刘品新.论电子证据的原件理论[J].法律科学,2009(5):17-25.
[7]Editor.Rules on electronic evidence[EB/OL].[2016-08-04].http://nationallibraryphilippines.w ikispaces.com/file/view/Court+Rules+on+Electronic+Evidence.pdf.
[8]Editor.Uniform electronic evidence act(1998)[EB/OL].[2016-08-01].http://w w w.ulcc.ca/en/uniform-acts-new-order/older-uniform-acts/749-electronic-evidence/1924-electronic-evidence-act.
[9]Editor.Electronic transactions act[EB/OL].[2016-07-25].http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=Comp Id%3A1f4c67a4-a626-4f42-b2ad-6035d6c7d797;rec=0;res Url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.agc.gov.sg%2Faol%2Fbrowse%2FtitleResults.w3p%3Bletter%3DE%3Btype%3Dacts All.
[10]Editor.Evidence act[EB/OL].[2016-07-10].http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=Comp Id%3A4592b5b4-21ca-446e-9326-981f8163f9eb;rec=0;res Url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.agc.gov.sg%2Faol%2Fbrow se%2FtitleResults.w3p%3Bletter%3DE%3Bp Num%3D2%3Btype%3Dacts All;w hole=yes.
[11]吴同,周丽.论刑事诉讼中电子证据的鉴真[J].山东警察学院学报,2014(1):74-78.
[12]张保生.证据法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:195.
[13]陈瑞华.实物证据的鉴真问题[J].法学研究,2011(5):130-135.
[14]林安民.加拿大证据法对我国相关立法的启示[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2006(1):18-22.
[15]Editor.Evidence(amendment)bill 2012[EB/OL].[2016-08-06].http://www.parliament.gov.sg/sites/default/files/Evidence%20(Amendment)%20Bill%202-12.pdf.
[16]Generally H.Laws of Singapore:evidence[M].Singapore:Butterw orths Asia,2000:5.
[17]Editor.Evidence act of Singapore[EB/OL].[2016-08-01].http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN025627.pdf.
[18]Editor.Mitfam International Ltd v.Motley Resources Pte Ltd.[2013]SGHC270[EB/OL].[2016-07-10].http://w w w.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/law s-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15440-mitfam-international-ltd-v-motley-resources-pte-ltd-2013-sghc-270.
[19]杨良宜,杨大明.英美证据法[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:42.
[20]樊崇义.刑事证据规则研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2014:470.
[2]刘品新.网络时代刑事司法理念与制度的创新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013:198.
[3]汪振林.电子数据分类研究[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2013(3):22-26.
[4]Editor.Lorraine v.Markel American Insurance Company,241 F.R.D.534,546(D.M d.M ay 4,2007)[EB/OL].[2016-08-06].http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Opinions/Lorraine%20v.%20M arkel%20-%20ESIADM ISSIBILITY%20OPINION.pdf.
[5]Wendy L.A commentary on the amendments to the electronic evidence:provisions in the Singapore Evidence Act[M].Singapore:Law Gazette,2012:18.
[6]刘品新.论电子证据的原件理论[J].法律科学,2009(5):17-25.
[7]Editor.Rules on electronic evidence[EB/OL].[2016-08-04].http://nationallibraryphilippines.w ikispaces.com/file/view/Court+Rules+on+Electronic+Evidence.pdf.
[8]Editor.Uniform electronic evidence act(1998)[EB/OL].[2016-08-01].http://w w w.ulcc.ca/en/uniform-acts-new-order/older-uniform-acts/749-electronic-evidence/1924-electronic-evidence-act.
[9]Editor.Electronic transactions act[EB/OL].[2016-07-25].http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=Comp Id%3A1f4c67a4-a626-4f42-b2ad-6035d6c7d797;rec=0;res Url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.agc.gov.sg%2Faol%2Fbrowse%2FtitleResults.w3p%3Bletter%3DE%3Btype%3Dacts All.
[10]Editor.Evidence act[EB/OL].[2016-07-10].http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=Comp Id%3A4592b5b4-21ca-446e-9326-981f8163f9eb;rec=0;res Url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatutes.agc.gov.sg%2Faol%2Fbrow se%2FtitleResults.w3p%3Bletter%3DE%3Bp Num%3D2%3Btype%3Dacts All;w hole=yes.
[11]吴同,周丽.论刑事诉讼中电子证据的鉴真[J].山东警察学院学报,2014(1):74-78.
[12]张保生.证据法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:195.
[13]陈瑞华.实物证据的鉴真问题[J].法学研究,2011(5):130-135.
[14]林安民.加拿大证据法对我国相关立法的启示[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2006(1):18-22.
[15]Editor.Evidence(amendment)bill 2012[EB/OL].[2016-08-06].http://www.parliament.gov.sg/sites/default/files/Evidence%20(Amendment)%20Bill%202-12.pdf.
[16]Generally H.Laws of Singapore:evidence[M].Singapore:Butterw orths Asia,2000:5.
[17]Editor.Evidence act of Singapore[EB/OL].[2016-08-01].http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN025627.pdf.
[18]Editor.Mitfam International Ltd v.Motley Resources Pte Ltd.[2013]SGHC270[EB/OL].[2016-07-10].http://w w w.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/law s-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15440-mitfam-international-ltd-v-motley-resources-pte-ltd-2013-sghc-270.
[19]杨良宜,杨大明.英美证据法[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:42.
[20]樊崇义.刑事证据规则研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2014:470.