国外阅读媒介选择研究进展
|
摘要
[目的/意义]新技术环境下阅读媒介种类日益丰富,了解读者如何选择和使用不同的媒介,以便根据其需求特征提供合适的媒介服务,促使资源能够被充分利用。[研究设计/方法]对国外有关阅读媒介研究成果进行系统梳理,以互联网的发展为标志划分为三个时期,总结每个时期的主要研究成果和特点。[结论/发现]早期研究主要围绕电脑屏幕的阅读可用性展开;有线互联网时期重点研究读者对纸质媒介和电脑媒介的态度、偏好和行为及其影响因素;移动互联网的出现拓展了阅读媒介的类型,智能手机、电子阅读器和平板电脑的阅读行为成为新的研究热点,同时出现了对读者阅读媒介选择行为进行系统解释的理论观点。[创新/价值]系统概述了国外有关阅读媒介选择问题研究进展,针对当前研究存在的主要问题进行评价,展望今后的研究方向,提出对国内有关研究的启示。
[Purpose/Significance]In the new technology environment, there are many kinds of reading mediums. This paper intends to understand how readers choose and use different mediums in order to provide appropriate service according to readers' behavior characteristics, and help maximize the use of resources. [Design/Methodology]This paper sort out existing research on reading mediums abroad, which could be divided into three stages according to the development of internet. Meanwhile, the main achievements and characteristics of each stage have been summarized. [Findings/Conclusion]Before the advent of cable Internet, early research focused on readability of computer screens. During the prevalence of cable internet, researchers mainly studied readers' behaviors and attitudes of papery medium and computer mediums, as well as their impact factors. The emergence of mobile Internet has expanded the types of reading medium. At the same time, reading behaviors of smart phones, e-readers and tablets have become new research focus, while several theories have arisen that attempt to explain the behaviors and attitudes of readers. [Originality/Value]This paper has comprehensively summarized foreign research progress on reading medium selection, and made an assessment of the main problems of current research. It also provides an outlook of future research and an enlightenment to the relevant research in China.
[Purpose/Significance]In the new technology environment, there are many kinds of reading mediums. This paper intends to understand how readers choose and use different mediums in order to provide appropriate service according to readers' behavior characteristics, and help maximize the use of resources. [Design/Methodology]This paper sort out existing research on reading mediums abroad, which could be divided into three stages according to the development of internet. Meanwhile, the main achievements and characteristics of each stage have been summarized. [Findings/Conclusion]Before the advent of cable Internet, early research focused on readability of computer screens. During the prevalence of cable internet, researchers mainly studied readers' behaviors and attitudes of papery medium and computer mediums, as well as their impact factors. The emergence of mobile Internet has expanded the types of reading medium. At the same time, reading behaviors of smart phones, e-readers and tablets have become new research focus, while several theories have arisen that attempt to explain the behaviors and attitudes of readers. [Originality/Value]This paper has comprehensively summarized foreign research progress on reading medium selection, and made an assessment of the main problems of current research. It also provides an outlook of future research and an enlightenment to the relevant research in China.
引文
1 亚马逊电子书销量首次超过纸质书[EB/OL].[2018-10-14].https://article.pchome.net/content-1334490.html.
2 Infographic:U.S.Students Prefer Digital[EB/OL].[2018-10-14].https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2409734,00.asp.
3 第43次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R/OL]. [2019-02-28].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P020190318523029756345.pdf.
4 Digital Omnivores: How Tablets, Smartphones and Connected Devices are Changing U.S. Digital Media Consumption Habits[EB/OL]. [2018-10-14].http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2011/Digital-Omnivores.
5 Dillon A. Reading from Paper Versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature[J]. Ergonomics, 1992, 35(10): 1297-1326.
6 Kruk R S, Muter P. Reading of Continuous Text on Video Screens[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 1984, 26(3):339-345.
7 Wright P, Lickorish A. Proof-reading Texts on Screen and Paper[J]. Behavior & Information Technology, 1983, 2(3):227-235.
8 Ho S F, Tan K T. Health Hazards of Work on Visual Display Units[J]. Singapore Med J, 1986, 27(4):307-311.
9 Dillon A, Mcknight C, Richardson J. Reading from Paper versus Reading from Screen[J]. Computer Journal, 1988, 31(5):457-464.
10 Muter P, Latrémouille S A, Treurniet W C, et al. Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens[J]. Human Factors, 1982, 24(5):501-508.
11 Gould J D, Alfaro L, Finn R, et al. Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper[J]. Human Factors, 1987, 29(5):497-517.
12 Muter P, Maurutto P. Reading and Skimming from Computer Screens and Books: the Paperless Office Revisited?[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1991, 10(4):257-266.
13 JISC National E-books Observatory Project: Key Findings and Recommendations[EB/OL].[2018-10-14].http://observatory.jiscebooks.org/reports/
14 Tenopir C, King D W, Edwards S, et al. Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns[J]. Aslib Proceedings, 2013, 61(1):5-32.
15 Liu Z. Reading Behavior in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behavior Over the Past Ten Years[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(6): 700-712.
16,25 Levine-clark M. Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver[J]. Portal Libraries & the Academy, 2006, 6(3):285-299.
17,21,24 Shelburne W A. E-book Usage in an Academic Library: User Attitudes and Behaviors[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2009, 33(2):59-72.
18 Adler A, Gujar A, Harrison B L, et al. A Diary Study of Work-related Reading: Design Implications for Digital Reading Devices[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998: 241-248.
19,53 Sellen A J, Harper R H R. The Myth of the Paperless Office[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2003.
20,30 Sellen A, Harper R. Paper as an Analytic Resource for the Design of New Technologies[C]//Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1997: 319-326.
22 Nicholas A, Lewis J. Millennial Attitudes Toward Books and E-Books[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008, 5(2):81-92.
23 Chu H. Electronic Books: Viewpoints from Users and Potential Users[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2003, 21(3):340-346.
26 Liu Z. Print vs. Electronic Resources: A Study of User Perceptions, Preferences, and Use[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(2): 583-592.
27 Slater R. E-books or Print Nooks, “Big Deals” or Local Selections—What Gets More Use?[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2009, 33(1):31-41.
28 Fernandez M. A Usage Comparison for Print and Electronic Books in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill[D]. Chapei Hill: University of North Carolina, 2003.
29 Liu Z, Huang X. Gender Differences in the Online Reading Environment[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2008, 64(4): 616-626.
31 W?stlund E, Reinikka H, Norlander T, et al. Effects of VDT and Paper Presentation on Consumption and Production of Information: Psychological and Physiological Factors[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(2):377-394.
32 Kim H, Kim J. Reading from an LCD Monitor Versus Paper: Teenagers’ Reading Performance[J]. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2013, 2(1): 1-10.
33 Murphy P K, Long J F, Holleran T A, et al. Persuasion Online or on Paper: A New Take on an Old Issue[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2003, 13(5): 511-532.
34 Maynard S E. Print and Digital Texts: Evaluating the Differences in Reading Comprehension Strategies[D]. Phoenix: University of Phoenix, 2016.
35 Mayes D K, Sims V K, Koonce J M. Comprehension and Workload Differences for VDT and Paper-based Reading[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001, 28(6): 367-378.
36 Nicholas D, Clark D, et al. Information on the Go: A Case Study of European Mobile Users[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7): 1311-1322.
37,39 Walsh A. Mobile Information Literacy: A Preliminary Outline of Information Behavior in a Mobile Environment[J]. Journal of Information Literacy, 2012, 6(2): 56-69.
38,40 Liu Z, Huang X, Fu Y. Information Behavior in the Mobile Environment: A Study of Undergraduate Smartphone Users in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 2014, 7(4):1-15.
41 Just M A, Carpenter P A. Capacity Theory of Comprehension: Individual Differences in Working Memory . Psychological Review, 1992 (99)122-149.
42 Noyes J M, Garland K J. VDT versus Paper-based Text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003, 31(6):411-423.
43 Margolin S J, Driscoll C, Toland M J, et al. E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change across Media Platforms?[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2013, 27(4): 512-519.
44 Kretzschmar F, Pleimling D, Hosemann J, et al. Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eye tracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(2):e56178.
45 杨达, 毕强. 超媒体信息空间中导航用户认知地图的建构[J]. 图书情报工作, 2005, 49(8):28-32.
46 Li L Y, Chen G D, Yang S J. Construction of Cognitive Maps to Improve E-Book Reading and Navigation[J]. Computers & Education, 2013, 60(1):32-39.
47 Rothkopf E Z. Incidental Memory for Location of Information in Text[J]. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10(6):608-613.
48 Waller R. Graphic Literacies for a Digital Age: The Survival of Layout[J]. Information Society, 2012, 28(4):236-252.
49,51 Mangen A. Hypertext Fiction Reading: Haptics and Immersion[J]. Journal of Research in Reading, 2010, 31(4):404-419.
50 Gerlach J, Buxmann P. Investigating the Acceptance of Electronic Books-the Impact of Haptic Dissonance on Innovation Adoption[C]//Proceedings of European Conference of Informat in System, 2011:141.
52 Hillesund T. Digital Reading Spaces: How Expert Readers Handle Books, the Web and Electronic Paper[J/OL]. First Monday, 2010.15(4).[2018-10-14]. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2762/2504.
54 Thayer A, Lee C P, Hwang L H, et al. The Imposition and Superimposition of Digital Reading Technology: the Academic Potential of E-readers[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011: 2917-2926.
55 朱原谅. 基于元认知的网络阅读研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(2):59-61.
56 Ackerman R, Goldsmith M. Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2011, 17(1): 18.
57 Darmanin M. Reading and Writing in the Digital Age: Exploring Two Classes in a Maltese Primary School[D]. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 2017.
58 舒瑜. 物的生命传记——读《物的社会生命:文化视野中的商品》[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(6):223-234.
59 Hupfeld A. Designing the Social Life of Books and E-books[D]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2015.
2 Infographic:U.S.Students Prefer Digital[EB/OL].[2018-10-14].https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2409734,00.asp.
3 第43次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R/OL]. [2019-02-28].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P020190318523029756345.pdf.
4 Digital Omnivores: How Tablets, Smartphones and Connected Devices are Changing U.S. Digital Media Consumption Habits[EB/OL]. [2018-10-14].http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2011/Digital-Omnivores.
5 Dillon A. Reading from Paper Versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature[J]. Ergonomics, 1992, 35(10): 1297-1326.
6 Kruk R S, Muter P. Reading of Continuous Text on Video Screens[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 1984, 26(3):339-345.
7 Wright P, Lickorish A. Proof-reading Texts on Screen and Paper[J]. Behavior & Information Technology, 1983, 2(3):227-235.
8 Ho S F, Tan K T. Health Hazards of Work on Visual Display Units[J]. Singapore Med J, 1986, 27(4):307-311.
9 Dillon A, Mcknight C, Richardson J. Reading from Paper versus Reading from Screen[J]. Computer Journal, 1988, 31(5):457-464.
10 Muter P, Latrémouille S A, Treurniet W C, et al. Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens[J]. Human Factors, 1982, 24(5):501-508.
11 Gould J D, Alfaro L, Finn R, et al. Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper[J]. Human Factors, 1987, 29(5):497-517.
12 Muter P, Maurutto P. Reading and Skimming from Computer Screens and Books: the Paperless Office Revisited?[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1991, 10(4):257-266.
13 JISC National E-books Observatory Project: Key Findings and Recommendations[EB/OL].[2018-10-14].http://observatory.jiscebooks.org/reports/
14 Tenopir C, King D W, Edwards S, et al. Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns[J]. Aslib Proceedings, 2013, 61(1):5-32.
15 Liu Z. Reading Behavior in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behavior Over the Past Ten Years[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(6): 700-712.
16,25 Levine-clark M. Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver[J]. Portal Libraries & the Academy, 2006, 6(3):285-299.
17,21,24 Shelburne W A. E-book Usage in an Academic Library: User Attitudes and Behaviors[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2009, 33(2):59-72.
18 Adler A, Gujar A, Harrison B L, et al. A Diary Study of Work-related Reading: Design Implications for Digital Reading Devices[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998: 241-248.
19,53 Sellen A J, Harper R H R. The Myth of the Paperless Office[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2003.
20,30 Sellen A, Harper R. Paper as an Analytic Resource for the Design of New Technologies[C]//Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1997: 319-326.
22 Nicholas A, Lewis J. Millennial Attitudes Toward Books and E-Books[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008, 5(2):81-92.
23 Chu H. Electronic Books: Viewpoints from Users and Potential Users[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2003, 21(3):340-346.
26 Liu Z. Print vs. Electronic Resources: A Study of User Perceptions, Preferences, and Use[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(2): 583-592.
27 Slater R. E-books or Print Nooks, “Big Deals” or Local Selections—What Gets More Use?[J]. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 2009, 33(1):31-41.
28 Fernandez M. A Usage Comparison for Print and Electronic Books in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill[D]. Chapei Hill: University of North Carolina, 2003.
29 Liu Z, Huang X. Gender Differences in the Online Reading Environment[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2008, 64(4): 616-626.
31 W?stlund E, Reinikka H, Norlander T, et al. Effects of VDT and Paper Presentation on Consumption and Production of Information: Psychological and Physiological Factors[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(2):377-394.
32 Kim H, Kim J. Reading from an LCD Monitor Versus Paper: Teenagers’ Reading Performance[J]. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2013, 2(1): 1-10.
33 Murphy P K, Long J F, Holleran T A, et al. Persuasion Online or on Paper: A New Take on an Old Issue[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2003, 13(5): 511-532.
34 Maynard S E. Print and Digital Texts: Evaluating the Differences in Reading Comprehension Strategies[D]. Phoenix: University of Phoenix, 2016.
35 Mayes D K, Sims V K, Koonce J M. Comprehension and Workload Differences for VDT and Paper-based Reading[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001, 28(6): 367-378.
36 Nicholas D, Clark D, et al. Information on the Go: A Case Study of European Mobile Users[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7): 1311-1322.
37,39 Walsh A. Mobile Information Literacy: A Preliminary Outline of Information Behavior in a Mobile Environment[J]. Journal of Information Literacy, 2012, 6(2): 56-69.
38,40 Liu Z, Huang X, Fu Y. Information Behavior in the Mobile Environment: A Study of Undergraduate Smartphone Users in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 2014, 7(4):1-15.
41 Just M A, Carpenter P A. Capacity Theory of Comprehension: Individual Differences in Working Memory . Psychological Review, 1992 (99)122-149.
42 Noyes J M, Garland K J. VDT versus Paper-based Text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003, 31(6):411-423.
43 Margolin S J, Driscoll C, Toland M J, et al. E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change across Media Platforms?[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2013, 27(4): 512-519.
44 Kretzschmar F, Pleimling D, Hosemann J, et al. Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eye tracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(2):e56178.
45 杨达, 毕强. 超媒体信息空间中导航用户认知地图的建构[J]. 图书情报工作, 2005, 49(8):28-32.
46 Li L Y, Chen G D, Yang S J. Construction of Cognitive Maps to Improve E-Book Reading and Navigation[J]. Computers & Education, 2013, 60(1):32-39.
47 Rothkopf E Z. Incidental Memory for Location of Information in Text[J]. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10(6):608-613.
48 Waller R. Graphic Literacies for a Digital Age: The Survival of Layout[J]. Information Society, 2012, 28(4):236-252.
49,51 Mangen A. Hypertext Fiction Reading: Haptics and Immersion[J]. Journal of Research in Reading, 2010, 31(4):404-419.
50 Gerlach J, Buxmann P. Investigating the Acceptance of Electronic Books-the Impact of Haptic Dissonance on Innovation Adoption[C]//Proceedings of European Conference of Informat in System, 2011:141.
52 Hillesund T. Digital Reading Spaces: How Expert Readers Handle Books, the Web and Electronic Paper[J/OL]. First Monday, 2010.15(4).[2018-10-14]. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2762/2504.
54 Thayer A, Lee C P, Hwang L H, et al. The Imposition and Superimposition of Digital Reading Technology: the Academic Potential of E-readers[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011: 2917-2926.
55 朱原谅. 基于元认知的网络阅读研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(2):59-61.
56 Ackerman R, Goldsmith M. Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2011, 17(1): 18.
57 Darmanin M. Reading and Writing in the Digital Age: Exploring Two Classes in a Maltese Primary School[D]. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 2017.
58 舒瑜. 物的生命传记——读《物的社会生命:文化视野中的商品》[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(6):223-234.
59 Hupfeld A. Designing the Social Life of Books and E-books[D]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2015.