基于直接评价法的省域科技创新竞争力及其影响因素研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on Competitiveness and Its Acting Factors of Provincial Science,Technology and Innovation Evaluation Based on Direct Evaluation Approach
  • 作者:张振山 ; 赵新力 ; 王丹
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Zhenshan;ZHAO Xinli;WANG Dan;School of Management,Harbin Institute of Technology;School of Economics,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology;China Science and Technology Exchange Center;College of Electrical and Information Engineering,Northeast Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:科学 ; 技术 ; 创新 ; 竞争力 ; 区域 ; 直接评价法 ; 投影寻踪
  • 英文关键词:science;;technology;;innovation;;competitiveness;;region;;direct evaluation approach;;projection pursuit model
  • 中文刊名:KJGL
  • 英文刊名:Science and Technology Management Research
  • 机构:哈尔滨工业大学管理学院;黑龙江科技大学经济学院;中国科学技术交流中心;东北农业大学电气与信息学院;
  • 出版日期:2016-04-10
  • 出版单位:科技管理研究
  • 年:2016
  • 期:v.36;No.353
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KJGL201607014
  • 页数:7
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:44-1223/G3
  • 分类号:83-89
摘要
传统科技创新是区域经济增长的主要动力。从全新视角,首次采用直接评价法结合面板数据,对我国31个省级行政区域(不含港澳台地区)时间序列的科技创新竞争力进行评价研究,客观地反映2004—2013年各省域科技创新竞争力的得分、排名及10年来的演变过程,并进一步分析相关因素对省域科技创新竞争力当期及滞后期的影响。从理论上对科技创新竞争力评价提出新的思路;实践上为地区科技创新竞争力决策提供一定的参考和借鉴。
        Science,technology and innovation( STI) is considered the driver of the growth of regional economy. The paper,from a new perspective for the first time,takes the direct evaluation method with the panel data of 31 provinces( municipality,autonomous region) in China to evaluate the competitiveness of science,technology and innovation( CSTI),which objectively reflects the provincial competitiveness score ranking and ten years of evolution process of CSTI from 2004 to 2013 as well as the current and lag period effect of related factors to the provincial CSTI. This paper puts forward new ideas for the evaluation of CSTI in theory,and offers the decision- making reference in practice to the CSTI of provinces( municipality,autonomous region).
引文
[1]董晔璐.我国区域科技竞争力分析与评价[J].科学管理研究,2013(4):73-76
    [2]阴新月.基于五元协同机理的天津市高新技术产业竞争力评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2011:1-2
    [3]DUTTA S,LANVIN B.The Global innovation index 2013[R].New York:Johnson Cornell Univesity,2013:365-377
    [4]彭博社.Bloomberg's global innovation index[EB/OL].(2014-01-15)[2015-03-12].http://www.bloomberg.com
    [5]JOSE L.Innovation,entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level[J].Small Business Economics,2012,39:561-574
    [6]LUMINIT N.Competitiveness in Southeastern Europe:from sources to future trends[J].Transition Studies Review,2008(15):157-170
    [7]URSZULA B.Regional competitiveness in Poland:creating an index[J].Jahrbuch Für Regional wissenscraft,2008,28:133-143
    [8]TEEMU M,ROBERT P.Benchmarking regional innovative performance:composite measures and direct innovation counts[J].Scientometrics,2013,94:247-262
    [9]LENGYE I,RECHNITZER J.Drivers of regional competitiveness in the central European countries[J].Transition Studies Review,2013,20:421-435
    [10]陈光潮,张辉,韩建安.基于灰色系统理论的区域科技竞争力比较[J].暨南大学学报(自然科学版),2004(1):19-25
    [11]曾繁华,杨明东.科技创新竞争力研究[J].贵州商业高等专科学校学报,2009(6):1-5
    [12]李雨佳,段金鑫.基于因子分析的我国省域科技进步研究分析[J].科协论坛,2011(1):180-181
    [13]曾慧芬.科技创新竞争力评价研究——以广州为例[J].科技管理研究,2012(12):12-15
    [14]YI D,ZHAO X.The evolution of engineering and technology view in P R China[C]//Proceedings of ESDA 2006 8th Biennial ASME Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis,Torino,Italy:Asme Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design&Analysis,2006:891-897
    [15]徐键叶,袁国欣.基于可拓方法的省际科技竞争力综合评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009(9):134-136
    [16]魏海燕.《世界竞争力年鉴》评价体系研究及其思考[J].科技管理研究,2013(5):58-61
    [17]张振山,赵新力,王丹.基于判断矩阵的国家创新竞争力评价指标时间序列权重分析——以R&D投入总额为例[J].科技与管理,2013,15(4):42-44,55
    [18]李建平,李闽榕,赵新力.世界创新竞争力发展报告(2001—2012)(黄皮书)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013
    [19]李建平,李闽榕,赵新力.二十国集团(G20)国家创新竞争力发展报告(2001—2010)(G20国家创新竞争力黄皮书)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700