食品安全领域惩罚性赔偿制度分析与完善——以法经济学为视角
|
摘要
惩罚性赔偿制度,是一项着眼于提高违法者违法成本,从而遏制不法行为的制度,根据这一制度的要求,可以判处违法者承担超过实际损害数额,从而威慑违法者。从法经济学角度来说,惩罚性赔偿制度增加了违法成本,从而震慑潜在的不法行为人远离违法行为,具体到食品安全领域,虽然新《食品安全法》重新修订了赔偿基数和赔偿数额,但离真正意义上的惩罚性赔偿制度还有距离,其设计的食品安全领域中的违法成本任然小于违法所得,无法有效遏制不法行为人,且消费者维权所得和维权成本任然存在落差,导致食品安全问题无法根本解决。所以,有必要在法经济学的视角下引入浮动限额制度,相关因素考量,增加边际成本的配套制度,从而构建一个更经济合理和充分发挥功能的惩罚性赔偿制度。
The system of punitive damages is a system which aims to improve the illegal costs of the offenders and thus deter the wrongful act.According to the requirements of this system,the offenders can be sentenced to exceed the actual amount of damage and thus deter the offenders.From the perspective of law and economics,the punitive compensation system increases the cost of the law,thereby deterring potential wrongful acts from breaking the law,specifically to the food safety field.Although the new food safety law revise the compensation base and the amount of compensation,it is far from the real punitive compensation system.The illegal cost in the field of food safety design is less than the illegal income,and it can not effectively contain the wrongful person.And the cost of the consumer's rights and the cost of safeguarding rights still exist,which leads to the problem of food safety.Therefore,it is necessary to introduce the system of floating limit under the perspective of law and economics,consider the relevant factors and increase the supporting system of marginal cost,so as to build a more economical and reasonable punitive compensation system.
The system of punitive damages is a system which aims to improve the illegal costs of the offenders and thus deter the wrongful act.According to the requirements of this system,the offenders can be sentenced to exceed the actual amount of damage and thus deter the offenders.From the perspective of law and economics,the punitive compensation system increases the cost of the law,thereby deterring potential wrongful acts from breaking the law,specifically to the food safety field.Although the new food safety law revise the compensation base and the amount of compensation,it is far from the real punitive compensation system.The illegal cost in the field of food safety design is less than the illegal income,and it can not effectively contain the wrongful person.And the cost of the consumer's rights and the cost of safeguarding rights still exist,which leads to the problem of food safety.Therefore,it is necessary to introduce the system of floating limit under the perspective of law and economics,consider the relevant factors and increase the supporting system of marginal cost,so as to build a more economical and reasonable punitive compensation system.
引文
[1]王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122.
[2]Garner B,EDITORINCHIEF.BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY[M].WEST,2009.
[3]张新宝,李倩.惩罚性赔偿的立法选择[J].清华法学,2009,03(4):5-20.
[4]波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].法律出版社,2012.
[5]荣振华.惩罚性赔偿制度思辩[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2011.
[6]奚晓明.《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文理解与适用[M].人民法院出版社,2010.
[7]凡朋敏,阚凯.论食品安全惩罚性赔偿规则的竞合适用[J].医学与法学,2017,9(5):28-32.
[8]符启林,江惠.论惩罚性损害赔偿[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,27(5):33-40.
[9]赫尔穆特·考茨欧,瓦内萨·威尔科克斯.惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角[M].中国法制出版社,2012.
[10]陈业宏,洪颖.食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度的法经济学分析[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2015(5):81-85.
[11]张云.产品责任的惩罚性损害赔偿制度研究[J].当代法学,2005,19(5):120-125.
[12]陈业宏,洪颖.食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度的法经济学分析[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2015(5):81-85.
[13]陈屹立,张帆.惩罚性赔偿的法经济学分析[J].经济体制改革,2009(2):167-171.
[2]Garner B,EDITORINCHIEF.BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY[M].WEST,2009.
[3]张新宝,李倩.惩罚性赔偿的立法选择[J].清华法学,2009,03(4):5-20.
[4]波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].法律出版社,2012.
[5]荣振华.惩罚性赔偿制度思辩[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2011.
[6]奚晓明.《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文理解与适用[M].人民法院出版社,2010.
[7]凡朋敏,阚凯.论食品安全惩罚性赔偿规则的竞合适用[J].医学与法学,2017,9(5):28-32.
[8]符启林,江惠.论惩罚性损害赔偿[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,27(5):33-40.
[9]赫尔穆特·考茨欧,瓦内萨·威尔科克斯.惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角[M].中国法制出版社,2012.
[10]陈业宏,洪颖.食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度的法经济学分析[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2015(5):81-85.
[11]张云.产品责任的惩罚性损害赔偿制度研究[J].当代法学,2005,19(5):120-125.
[12]陈业宏,洪颖.食品安全惩罚性赔偿制度的法经济学分析[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2015(5):81-85.
[13]陈屹立,张帆.惩罚性赔偿的法经济学分析[J].经济体制改革,2009(2):167-171.