情绪与性别对医疗风险决策的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influence of emotion and gender on medical risk decision-making
  • 作者:冯申梅 ; 杜红芹 ; 刘智文 ; 朱金富
  • 英文作者:FENG Shenmei;DU Hongqin;LIU Zhiwen;Psychological Department of Xinxiang Medical University;
  • 关键词:眼动技术 ; 情绪 ; 性别 ; 风险决策 ; 框架效应
  • 英文关键词:Eye movement technique;;Emotion;;Gender;;Risk decision marking;;Framing effect
  • 中文刊名:JKXL
  • 英文刊名:China Journal of Health Psychology
  • 机构:新乡医学院心理学院;沈阳师范大学教育科学学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-25
  • 出版单位:中国健康心理学杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.27
  • 基金:2015年度河南省高等学校重点科研项目(编号:15A190002);; 新乡医学院研究生科研创新支持计划资助项目(编号:YJSCX201645Y)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JKXL201904039
  • 页数:5
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-5257/R
  • 分类号:153-157
摘要
目的:探讨情绪与性别对医疗风险决策框架效应的影响。方法:结合使用眼动追踪技术与情绪启动范式,采用3(组别:厌恶、平静、愉悦)×2(性别:男、女)×2(框架类型:正性、负性)的混合实验设计进行实验。结果:不同框架下个体的决策差异有统计学意义(F=12.27,P<0.01),不同性别的决策差异有统计学意义(F=6.01,P<0.05);情绪启动在决策选择、注视时间与注视次数上的主效应均无统计学意义(P>0.05),性别在注视时间与注视次数上的主效应均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:框架类型与决策概率(数字)在一定程度上影响了个体决策时的认知加工过程与最终的决策选择,但这一认知过程受情绪与性别的影响并不明显;虽然情绪对个体决策行为的影响不明显,但性别会影响个体的决策行为。
        Objective:To investigate influence of gender and emotion on medical risk decision-making.Methods:Combined with eye movement tracking technique and emotional priming paradigm,a 3(groups:aversion,calm,pleasure)× 2(sex:male,female)×2(frame type:positive,negative)factorial experiment were used to conduct the experiment.Results:The individual decision had statistical significance in different frame(F=12.27,P<0.01),Gender differences were statistically significant in decision-making(F=6.01,P<0.05);The main effects of emotional start on decision selection,fixation time and fixation times were not statistically significant(P>0.05),and there was no significant difference between the main effect of gazing time and the number of fixations(P>0.05).Conclusion:The frame type and decision probability(number)influence the cognitive process and the final decision choice to some extent,but this cognitive process is not influenced by emotion and gender;Although the influence of emotion on individual decision-making behavior is not obvious,gender affects individual's decision-making behavior.
引文
[1]唐一婷.正负框架对癌症患者医疗决策类型的影响研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2015
    [2]徐富明,史燕伟,王伟,等.情绪影响框架效应的眼动研究初探[J].应用心理学,2015,21(2):154-157
    [3]宋之杰,王小辉,尚俊辰,等.基于眼动追踪实验的焦虑情绪对风险决策框架效应的影响研究[J].科技与管理,2015,17(1):30-31
    [4]Pu B,Peng H,Xia S.Role of emotion and cognition on age differences in the framing effect[J].International Journal of Aging&Human Development,2017,85(3):305-325
    [5]Kim S,Goldstein D,Hasher L,et al.Framing effects in younger and older adults[J].The Journals of Gerontology,2005,60(4),215-218
    [6]徐四华,方杰.应激影响风险决策的研究进展[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2014,23(12):1138-1140
    [7]宋灵青,李玉环,刘儒德.情绪与认知方式对决策的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(1):117-120
    [8]Roidl E,Frehse B,Hoger R.Emotional states of drivers and the impact on speed,acceleration and traffic violations-A simulator study[J].AccidAnalPrev,2014,70(5):282-292
    [9]Taubmanbenari O.The effects of positive emotion priming on self-reported reckless driving[J].Accid Anal Prev,2012,45(2):718-725
    [10]Cassotti M,Habib M,Poirel N,et al.Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making[J].Emotion,2012,12(5),926-931
    [11]张云翌,杨乃定.决策者情绪对应急决策的影响研究:一个理论框架[J].情报杂志,2015,34(10):65-70
    [12]Jingjie W U,Yang N,Feng C,et al.The effects of emotion on risk preference and framing effect under emergency[J].Chinese Journal of Management,2016,13(6):906-912
    [13]Lu J,Yang N,Ye J,et al.Differential effects of specific negative emotions on individual risk preference behaviors under social accidents:An analysis from the perspective of affective computing theory[J].Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala,2017,50(2015):172-192
    [14]Ma Q,Pei G,Wang K.Influence of negative emotion on the framing effect:Evidence from event-related potentials[J].Neuro Report,2015,26(6),325-332
    [15]Wang Xiaoyan,The influence of personality and emotion on risk decision of college students[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2014,22(12):1804-1087
    [16]徐四华.趋近和回避动机情绪对不确定性决策的影响[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(9):830-834
    [17]王光荣,朱凡钰.情绪、性别和方案数量对危机决策的影响[J].心理科学,2013,36(1):188-193
    [18]Liting,Zhou Hongwei,Weiqing.et al.Eye movement study on the influence of temperament types on emotional information attention bias[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2017,25(1):130-135
    [19]Ho H F.The effects of controlling visual attention to handbags for women in online shops:Evidence from eye movements[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2014,30(1):146-152
    [20]Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J].Science,1981,211(4481):453-458
    [21]汪祚军,李纾.对整合模型和占优启发式模型的检验:基于信息加工过程的眼动研究证据[J].心理学报,2012,44(2):179-198
    [22]De Martino B,Kumaran D,Seymour B,et al.Frames,biases,and rational decision-making in the human brain[J].Science,2006,313(5787):684-687
    [23]Zhang Yuqun,Wang Xiaojun.The influence of college students'emotion and emotional Intelligence on risk decision[J].China Journal of Health Psychology,2013,21(6):926-928
    [24]周湛菁.性别、情绪效价和情绪唤醒度对风险决策的影响[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2016
    [25]吴兴启,代迎菊,马慧娟,等.偏头痛患者的跨时决策研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2017,26(3):226-231

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700