外文电子学术期刊数据库传播效果研究
|
摘要
目前国内外缺乏对多种电子学术期刊数据库的传播效果进行横向对比的独立实证研究。本文以我国高校常用的23个外文电子学术期刊数据库为研究对象,在相关研究成果的基础上加入数据库官网外向反向链接数量、全球网站排名创新评价指标,采用数据包络分析法(DEA),基于CCR和BCC模型对外文电子学术期刊数据库知识传播效率进行实证研究,对模型数据进行多元回归分析,探索影响知识传播效率的主要因素。研究发现,目前有30.43%的外文电子学术期刊数据库的知识传播效率低于平均值,仍有较大提升空间。影响知识传播效率的主要因素有数据库官网的日均PV、日均IP、外向反向链接数量、全球网站排名和数据库收录期刊的JCR影响因子平均值等。根据实证研究结果,本文建议要提升知识传播效率,外文电子学术期刊数据库在着力扩大网络传播资源规模的同时,还需注重提升资源的网络传播质量和数据库内期刊的办刊质量。
There have been few independent empirical and comparative researches on knowledge dissemination effectiveness of different electronic academic journal databases until now.By applying two DEA models of CCR and BBC,this paper analyzed the knowledge dissemination effectiveness of 23 popular academic journal databases used by Chinese universities.Based on the former studies,another two indicators were added into evaluation system:the number of outbound backlinks and the global ranking of the databases' official websites.Then it used multivariate regression analysis to explore whether and how the inputs and outputs influenced databases' knowledge dissemination effectiveness.The study found that 30.43% foreign academic journal databases' knowledge dissemination efficiency is below the average level,which needs to be improved.Thus there is a need to improve it in the future.The main impact factors includ the official websites' daily average PV,daily average IP,the number of outbound backlinks,the global ranking,and the average values of JCR influencing factors.In order to enhance the efficiency of knowledge dissemination,it is suggested that foreign language databases should pay more attention to improving the online communication efficiency of knowledge.It is not only necessary to expand the quantity of online distribution of resources,but also improve the quality of journals in the databases and improve the distribution quality.
There have been few independent empirical and comparative researches on knowledge dissemination effectiveness of different electronic academic journal databases until now.By applying two DEA models of CCR and BBC,this paper analyzed the knowledge dissemination effectiveness of 23 popular academic journal databases used by Chinese universities.Based on the former studies,another two indicators were added into evaluation system:the number of outbound backlinks and the global ranking of the databases' official websites.Then it used multivariate regression analysis to explore whether and how the inputs and outputs influenced databases' knowledge dissemination effectiveness.The study found that 30.43% foreign academic journal databases' knowledge dissemination efficiency is below the average level,which needs to be improved.Thus there is a need to improve it in the future.The main impact factors includ the official websites' daily average PV,daily average IP,the number of outbound backlinks,the global ranking,and the average values of JCR influencing factors.In order to enhance the efficiency of knowledge dissemination,it is suggested that foreign language databases should pay more attention to improving the online communication efficiency of knowledge.It is not only necessary to expand the quantity of online distribution of resources,but also improve the quality of journals in the databases and improve the distribution quality.
引文
1张垒.科技期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1408-1413.
2 张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析:基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):516-521,615.
3 Bot M,Burgemeester J,Roes H.The Cost of Publishing an Electronic Journal:a General Model and a Case Study[J].D-LIB Magazine,1998,4(11):1-11.
4 Wiley L,Chrzastowski T E.The Illinois Interlibrary Loan Assessment ProjectⅡ:Revisiting State Wide Article Sharing and Assessing the Impact of Electronic Full-text Journals[J].Library Collections,Acquisitions&Technical Services,2002,26(1):19-33.
5 张彬.外文电子期刊全文数据库评价模型[D].南京:南京农业大学.2007.
6 徐佳宁.中外学术期刊数据库特点及其差异[J].图书馆杂志,2011,30(1):40-46.
7 谭捷,张李义,饶丽君.中文学术期刊数据库的比较研究[J].图书情报知识,2010,136(4):4-13.
8 聂应高.EBSCO和Springer Link外文期刊数据库比较研究[J].晋图学刊,2005,86(1):20-22,73.
9 徐淑慧.提高外文期刊数据库利用率的对策[J].大学图书情报学刊,2006,24(1):49-56.
10 郑萍.学术期刊数据库特性及商业模式对价格的影响[J].新世纪图书馆,2013(8):35-38.
11 Banker R D,Charnes A,Cooper W W.Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis[J].Management science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.
12 Charnes A,Cooper W,Rhodes E.Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units[J],European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
13 叶俊华.我国上市银行技术效率与规模效率评价[J].商业时代,2012,551(4):50-51.
14 朱乔.数据包络分析(DEA)方法的综述与展望[J].系统工程方法与应用,1994,3(4):1-9.
15 Hirsch J E.An Index to Quantify an Individuals Scientific Research Output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
16 Moed H F.The Impact-factors Debate:the ISI's Uses and Limits[J].Nature,2002,415(6873):731-732.
17 胡清华.《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》2002—2011年高被引论文特征分析及启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2013,24(4):699-702.
2 张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析:基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):516-521,615.
3 Bot M,Burgemeester J,Roes H.The Cost of Publishing an Electronic Journal:a General Model and a Case Study[J].D-LIB Magazine,1998,4(11):1-11.
4 Wiley L,Chrzastowski T E.The Illinois Interlibrary Loan Assessment ProjectⅡ:Revisiting State Wide Article Sharing and Assessing the Impact of Electronic Full-text Journals[J].Library Collections,Acquisitions&Technical Services,2002,26(1):19-33.
5 张彬.外文电子期刊全文数据库评价模型[D].南京:南京农业大学.2007.
6 徐佳宁.中外学术期刊数据库特点及其差异[J].图书馆杂志,2011,30(1):40-46.
7 谭捷,张李义,饶丽君.中文学术期刊数据库的比较研究[J].图书情报知识,2010,136(4):4-13.
8 聂应高.EBSCO和Springer Link外文期刊数据库比较研究[J].晋图学刊,2005,86(1):20-22,73.
9 徐淑慧.提高外文期刊数据库利用率的对策[J].大学图书情报学刊,2006,24(1):49-56.
10 郑萍.学术期刊数据库特性及商业模式对价格的影响[J].新世纪图书馆,2013(8):35-38.
11 Banker R D,Charnes A,Cooper W W.Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis[J].Management science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.
12 Charnes A,Cooper W,Rhodes E.Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units[J],European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
13 叶俊华.我国上市银行技术效率与规模效率评价[J].商业时代,2012,551(4):50-51.
14 朱乔.数据包络分析(DEA)方法的综述与展望[J].系统工程方法与应用,1994,3(4):1-9.
15 Hirsch J E.An Index to Quantify an Individuals Scientific Research Output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
16 Moed H F.The Impact-factors Debate:the ISI's Uses and Limits[J].Nature,2002,415(6873):731-732.
17 胡清华.《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》2002—2011年高被引论文特征分析及启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2013,24(4):699-702.