基于CVM与SBE的兰州市黄河风情线美学特征分析
|
摘要
黄河风情线是集兰州市黄河与两岸绿化带、沿线自然与人文景观为一体的带状旅游风景区。基于CVM与SBE结合景观指数,对黄河风情线的4个研究区自然性、多样性、连续性等美学特征进行量化分析。结果表明:①黄河风情线4个研究区的平均补偿意愿分别为21. 28元/a、19. 77元/a、16. 69元/a、20. 09元/a;②游客对不同研究区的同一美学特征补偿意愿有所不同;③基于CVM与SBE对4个研究区美学特征的定量分析,结果既存在一致性,也存在差异性。根据对风情线美学特征的分析,无论是对未修建的沿线景点规划建设,还是对已建成景点的维护整修都具有现实的指导意义。
The Yellow River style line was a band-shaped tourism scenic spot integrating the Yellow River and the cross-strait green belts and the natural cultural landscape along the Lanzhou. Based on the CVM and SBE combined landscape index,this paper quantitatively analyzed the natural features,diversity,continuity and other aesthetic features of the four research areas of the Yellow River Line of the fame. The results were as follows: ①Average compensation for the four research areas of the Yellow River Line of the fame,the intentions were 21. 28 yuan/a,19. 77 yuan/a,16. 69 yuan/a,and 20. 09 yuan/a respectively. ②Tourists had different aesthetic characteristics in different study areas. ③ Quantitative analysis of the aesthetic characteristics of the four research areas based on CVM and SBE had the identical results,but there were also differences. According to the analysis of the aesthetic features of the Yellow River style line,it was of practical significance both for planning and construction of unfinished scenic spots along the route and for maintaining and refurbishing existing scenic spots.
The Yellow River style line was a band-shaped tourism scenic spot integrating the Yellow River and the cross-strait green belts and the natural cultural landscape along the Lanzhou. Based on the CVM and SBE combined landscape index,this paper quantitatively analyzed the natural features,diversity,continuity and other aesthetic features of the four research areas of the Yellow River Line of the fame. The results were as follows: ①Average compensation for the four research areas of the Yellow River Line of the fame,the intentions were 21. 28 yuan/a,19. 77 yuan/a,16. 69 yuan/a,and 20. 09 yuan/a respectively. ②Tourists had different aesthetic characteristics in different study areas. ③ Quantitative analysis of the aesthetic characteristics of the four research areas based on CVM and SBE had the identical results,but there were also differences. According to the analysis of the aesthetic features of the Yellow River style line,it was of practical significance both for planning and construction of unfinished scenic spots along the route and for maintaining and refurbishing existing scenic spots.
引文
[1]肖笃宁,解伏菊,魏建兵.景观价值与景观保护评价[J].地理科学,2006,26(4)∶506-512.
[2]代迅.城市景观美学:理论架构与发展前景[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,37(4)∶173-180.
[3]俞金国,王丽华.城市旅游地景观格局分析方法———以大连为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2)∶281-289.
[4]吴健生,袁甜,王彤.基于三维景观指数的城市景观美学特征定量表达———以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(13)∶4519-4528.
[5]蒋宇.中国城市化进程中城市景观美学问题研究[D].重庆:西南大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[6]孙全治.自然景观的审美感受层次分析[J].行政科学论坛,2001,15(2)∶21-23.
[7]王雅.基于文化生态学的城市景观空间研究[D].成都:四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[8]章海荣.旅游美学研究对象辨析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,4(5)∶64-68.
[9]Svobodova K,Petr Sklenicka,Jiri Vojar. How Does the Representation Rate of Features in a Landscape Affect Visual Preferences? A Case Study from a Ppost-mining Landscape[J]. International Journal of Mining Reclamation&Environment,2015,29(4)∶266-276.
[10]董雪旺,张捷,刘传华,等.条件价值法中的偏差分析及信度和效度检验———以九寨沟游憩价值评估为例[J].地理学报,2011,(2)∶267-278.
[11]肖建红,于庆东,张运磊,等.基于CVM的旅游相关资源价值评估总体范围扩展方法研究[J].自然资源学报,2013,(9)∶1623-1636.
[12]柯惠新.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,1992.
[13]王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于SBE法的城郊森林公园森林林内景观美学质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(1)∶308-314.
[14]陈玲玲,潘鸿雷,刘佳雪.基于SBE的城市旅游地景观美学评价与对比研究———以南京与苏州为例[J].南京晓庄学院学报,2016,(6)∶110-115.
[15]俞孔坚.自然风景质量评价研究BIB-LCJ审美评判测量法[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,(2)∶1-11.
[2]代迅.城市景观美学:理论架构与发展前景[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,37(4)∶173-180.
[3]俞金国,王丽华.城市旅游地景观格局分析方法———以大连为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2)∶281-289.
[4]吴健生,袁甜,王彤.基于三维景观指数的城市景观美学特征定量表达———以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(13)∶4519-4528.
[5]蒋宇.中国城市化进程中城市景观美学问题研究[D].重庆:西南大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[6]孙全治.自然景观的审美感受层次分析[J].行政科学论坛,2001,15(2)∶21-23.
[7]王雅.基于文化生态学的城市景观空间研究[D].成都:四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[8]章海荣.旅游美学研究对象辨析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,4(5)∶64-68.
[9]Svobodova K,Petr Sklenicka,Jiri Vojar. How Does the Representation Rate of Features in a Landscape Affect Visual Preferences? A Case Study from a Ppost-mining Landscape[J]. International Journal of Mining Reclamation&Environment,2015,29(4)∶266-276.
[10]董雪旺,张捷,刘传华,等.条件价值法中的偏差分析及信度和效度检验———以九寨沟游憩价值评估为例[J].地理学报,2011,(2)∶267-278.
[11]肖建红,于庆东,张运磊,等.基于CVM的旅游相关资源价值评估总体范围扩展方法研究[J].自然资源学报,2013,(9)∶1623-1636.
[12]柯惠新.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,1992.
[13]王娜,钟永德,黎森.基于SBE法的城郊森林公园森林林内景观美学质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(1)∶308-314.
[14]陈玲玲,潘鸿雷,刘佳雪.基于SBE的城市旅游地景观美学评价与对比研究———以南京与苏州为例[J].南京晓庄学院学报,2016,(6)∶110-115.
[15]俞孔坚.自然风景质量评价研究BIB-LCJ审美评判测量法[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,(2)∶1-11.