保育和育肥猪舍气溶胶微生物组成和四环素类抗性基因丰度研究
|
摘要
本研究旨在比较保育舍和育肥舍气溶胶微生物组成和四环素类抗性基因丰度的差异。采集8个保育舍和8个育肥舍的空气样品,用RT-qPCR方法检测特定微生物类群的相对丰度和四环素类抗性基因的绝对丰度。结果表明:与保育舍相比,育肥舍气溶胶微生物组中厚壁菌门、乳酸杆菌属、罗伊氏乳杆菌和约氏乳杆菌丰度显著提高(P<0.05),而拟杆菌门、梭菌属和普雷沃氏菌属丰度显著降低(P<0.05);育肥舍气溶胶中TetB、TetH、TetZ、TetO、TetQ和TetW的拷贝数显著低于保育舍(P<0.05);主成分分析表明,保育舍和育肥舍气溶胶可按照微生物丰度和四环素类抗性基因丰度进行聚类。由此可见,不同猪舍类型微生物组成存在明显差异,保育舍抗性基因丰度显著高于育肥舍。
The present study was conducted to compare the microbial composition and abundances of tetracycline resistance genes in bioaerosols between nursery buildings and finishing buildings. Airborne samples from eight nursery buildings and eight finishing buildings were collected to determine the abundances of specific microbes and the copies of antibiotic resistance genes by using RT-qPCR. The results showed that the abundances of phylum Firmicutes, Lactobacillus,Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus johnsonii were higher in finishing buildings than those in nursery buildings(P<0.05). In addition,the abundances of phylum Bacteroidetes, Clostridia and Prevotella were lower in finishing buildings than those in nursery buildings(P<0.05). The primary component analyses showed that the bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings could be clustered by bacterial abundances or copy numbers of antibiotic resistance genes. In conclusion, the bioaerosol microbial composition in nursery buildings was different from that in finishing buildings, and the copies of antibiotic resistance genes were higher in nursery buildings than those in finishing buildings.
The present study was conducted to compare the microbial composition and abundances of tetracycline resistance genes in bioaerosols between nursery buildings and finishing buildings. Airborne samples from eight nursery buildings and eight finishing buildings were collected to determine the abundances of specific microbes and the copies of antibiotic resistance genes by using RT-qPCR. The results showed that the abundances of phylum Firmicutes, Lactobacillus,Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus johnsonii were higher in finishing buildings than those in nursery buildings(P<0.05). In addition,the abundances of phylum Bacteroidetes, Clostridia and Prevotella were lower in finishing buildings than those in nursery buildings(P<0.05). The primary component analyses showed that the bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings could be clustered by bacterial abundances or copy numbers of antibiotic resistance genes. In conclusion, the bioaerosol microbial composition in nursery buildings was different from that in finishing buildings, and the copies of antibiotic resistance genes were higher in nursery buildings than those in finishing buildings.
引文
[1]Heederik D,Brouwer R,Biersteker K,et al.Relationship of airborne endotoxin and bacteria levels in pig farms with the lung function and respiratory symptoms of farmers[J].Int Arch Occ Env Hea,1991,62(8):595-601.
[2]Balasubramanian R,Nainar P,Rajasekar A.Airborne bacteria,fungi,and endotoxin levels in residential microenvironments:a case study[J].Aerobiologia,2012,28(3):375-390.
[3]Nehme B,Létourneau V,Forster R J,et al.Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings,and assessment of the seasonal effect[J].Environ Microbio,2008,10(3):665-675.
[4]Kim K Y,Ko H J.Indoor distribution characteristics of airborne bacteria in pig buildings of South Korea according to seasonal aspect and pig housing type[J].Asian-Australas J Anim Sci,2018,doi:10.5713/ajas.18.0415.
[5]Kumari P,Choi H L.Seasonal variability in airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings[J].PLoS One,2014,9(11):e112897.
[6]Kim H B,Borewicz K,White B A,et al.Longitudinal investigation of the age-related bacterial diversity in the feces of commercial pigs[J].Vet Microbiol,2011,153(1-2):124-133.
[7]Niu Q,Li P,Hao S,et al.Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs[J].Sci Rep-UK,2015,5:9938.
[8]Hong P Y,Li X,Yang X,et al.Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings[J].Environ Microbio,2012,14(6):1420-1431.
[9]Bergstr?m A,Licht T R,Wilcks A,et al.Introducing GUt LowDensity Array(GULDA)-a validated approach for qPCR‐based intestinal microbial community analysis[J].FEMS Microbiol Lett,2012,337(1):38-47.
[10]Liu J,Pu Y Y,Xie Q,et al.Pectin induces an in vitro rumen microbial population shift attributed to the pectinolytic Treponema group[J].Curr Microbiol,2015,70(1):67-74.
[11]Kim H B,Sreevatsan K,Isaacson R E.Microbial shifts in the swine distal gut in response to the treatment with antimicrobial growth promoter,tylosin[J].P Natl Acad Sci USA,2012,109(38):15485-15490.
[12]Bindels L B,Beck R,Schakman O,et al.Restoring specific lactobacilli levels decreases inflammation and muscle atrophy markers in an acute leukemia mouse model[J].PLoS One,2012,7(6):e37971.
[2]Balasubramanian R,Nainar P,Rajasekar A.Airborne bacteria,fungi,and endotoxin levels in residential microenvironments:a case study[J].Aerobiologia,2012,28(3):375-390.
[3]Nehme B,Létourneau V,Forster R J,et al.Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings,and assessment of the seasonal effect[J].Environ Microbio,2008,10(3):665-675.
[4]Kim K Y,Ko H J.Indoor distribution characteristics of airborne bacteria in pig buildings of South Korea according to seasonal aspect and pig housing type[J].Asian-Australas J Anim Sci,2018,doi:10.5713/ajas.18.0415.
[5]Kumari P,Choi H L.Seasonal variability in airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings[J].PLoS One,2014,9(11):e112897.
[6]Kim H B,Borewicz K,White B A,et al.Longitudinal investigation of the age-related bacterial diversity in the feces of commercial pigs[J].Vet Microbiol,2011,153(1-2):124-133.
[7]Niu Q,Li P,Hao S,et al.Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs[J].Sci Rep-UK,2015,5:9938.
[8]Hong P Y,Li X,Yang X,et al.Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings[J].Environ Microbio,2012,14(6):1420-1431.
[9]Bergstr?m A,Licht T R,Wilcks A,et al.Introducing GUt LowDensity Array(GULDA)-a validated approach for qPCR‐based intestinal microbial community analysis[J].FEMS Microbiol Lett,2012,337(1):38-47.
[10]Liu J,Pu Y Y,Xie Q,et al.Pectin induces an in vitro rumen microbial population shift attributed to the pectinolytic Treponema group[J].Curr Microbiol,2015,70(1):67-74.
[11]Kim H B,Sreevatsan K,Isaacson R E.Microbial shifts in the swine distal gut in response to the treatment with antimicrobial growth promoter,tylosin[J].P Natl Acad Sci USA,2012,109(38):15485-15490.
[12]Bindels L B,Beck R,Schakman O,et al.Restoring specific lactobacilli levels decreases inflammation and muscle atrophy markers in an acute leukemia mouse model[J].PLoS One,2012,7(6):e37971.