人格心理学中特质与情境的争论、整合与应用
|
摘要
人类行为是否具有跨环境一致性,是人格心理学中特质和情境争论的主要焦点。随着研究的发展,二者从分庭抗礼逐渐走向融合,并在情境心理学、CASP理论、叙事研究范式、人员选拔中得到广泛应用,促进了二者的交互影响,也促进了在更宽泛的框架下理解人格结构。
It is the main focus of traits and situation argument in personality psychology that whether human behavior is consistent in different environment. With the development of the research, the two factors once separated have gradually been integrated and widely applied in situational psychology, CASP theory, narrative paradigm research and personnel selection, promoting the interaction between the two factors as well as the understanding of personality structure in a broader framework.
It is the main focus of traits and situation argument in personality psychology that whether human behavior is consistent in different environment. With the development of the research, the two factors once separated have gradually been integrated and widely applied in situational psychology, CASP theory, narrative paradigm research and personnel selection, promoting the interaction between the two factors as well as the understanding of personality structure in a broader framework.
引文
[1]Roberts B W,Kuncel N R,Shiner R.The power of personality:The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007(2):313-345.
[2]任国华,刘继亮.大五人格和工作绩效相关性研究的进展[J].心理科学,2005(2):406-408.
[3]David C F. Persons'behaviors and situations:An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era[J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2009(43):120-126.
[4]Pervin L A,周榕等译.人格科学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002:59-88.
[5]Shoda Y, Mischel W,Wright J C. Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior:Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994(4):674-687.
[6]王亚南.情境心理学的若干问题[J].心理学动态,1996(4):99-102.
[7]修巧艳,高峰强.CAPS理论与人格心理学的整合[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2005(2):89-93.
[8]马一波,郭永玉.叙事自我:特质与情境的整合[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):385-388.
[9]王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系[J].心理学报,2006(4):543-552.
[10]郭永玉,胡小勇.特质、动机和叙事:人格研究的三种范式及其整合[J].心理科学,2015(6):1489-1494.
[11]安晶卉,张建新.人格心理学研究中新的探索[J].心理科学进展,2004(3):402-408.
[12]Maaike, Ten B, Boele D R.The Structure of Situations from a Personality Perspective[J]. European Journal of Personality,2002(16):81-102.
[13]Reynolds B,Karraker K.A big five model of disposition and situation interaction:why a"helpful"person may not always behavehelpfully[J].New ideas in psychology,2003(21):1-13.
[14]Kevin M K, John A S, Glenn C. Person-Environment Congruence and Personality Domains in the Prediction of Job Performance and Work Quality[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology,2004(2):168-177.
[2]任国华,刘继亮.大五人格和工作绩效相关性研究的进展[J].心理科学,2005(2):406-408.
[3]David C F. Persons'behaviors and situations:An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era[J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2009(43):120-126.
[4]Pervin L A,周榕等译.人格科学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002:59-88.
[5]Shoda Y, Mischel W,Wright J C. Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior:Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994(4):674-687.
[6]王亚南.情境心理学的若干问题[J].心理学动态,1996(4):99-102.
[7]修巧艳,高峰强.CAPS理论与人格心理学的整合[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2005(2):89-93.
[8]马一波,郭永玉.叙事自我:特质与情境的整合[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):385-388.
[9]王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系[J].心理学报,2006(4):543-552.
[10]郭永玉,胡小勇.特质、动机和叙事:人格研究的三种范式及其整合[J].心理科学,2015(6):1489-1494.
[11]安晶卉,张建新.人格心理学研究中新的探索[J].心理科学进展,2004(3):402-408.
[12]Maaike, Ten B, Boele D R.The Structure of Situations from a Personality Perspective[J]. European Journal of Personality,2002(16):81-102.
[13]Reynolds B,Karraker K.A big five model of disposition and situation interaction:why a"helpful"person may not always behavehelpfully[J].New ideas in psychology,2003(21):1-13.
[14]Kevin M K, John A S, Glenn C. Person-Environment Congruence and Personality Domains in the Prediction of Job Performance and Work Quality[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology,2004(2):168-177.