基于领域热点的中外科研社交网络功能建设研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]当前,科研社交网络成为科研工作者一种重要的非正式交流工具,国内外的科研社交网络工具达到数十种,其中的佼佼者如Research Gate、academia.edu已拥有数千万注册用户。本文对中外科研社交网络的功能建设情况进行了分析,以期从中借鉴经验,为今后的建设提供指导。[方法/过程]首先通过科研社交网络学术论文的可视化分析,在此基础上总结出学界对这一工具的四大研究热点。随后基于科研社交网络功能和分类,扩展出23种具体功能,对每一类型中外代表性科研社交网络在重点功能上的表现进行了分析,发现共性、探索差异。[结论/结果 ]研究显示,当前科研社交网络的学术资源与专家信息已经较为丰富,社交功能多样,但科研管理工具发展不够充分,社会化标签与替代计量指标的应用有待继续扩展。
[Purpose/significance] At present, scientific social network has become an important informal scientific communication tool for researchers. There are dozens of social networking tools for scientific research at home and abroad. Among them, such as Research Gate and academia.edu have tens of millions registered user. [Method/process] Firstly, this paper summarized five research focuses of this tool on the basis of the visual analysis of scientific research social networking academic papers. Then, based on the research of social networking functions and classification from A. C. Bullinger and S. H. Hallerstede, we extended twenty-three kinds of specific functions, and analyzed the Chinese and foreign representative social networks' function design to explore their features, commonalities and differences. [Result/conclusion] The above analysis shows that the academic resources and expert information of scientific research social network are relatively abundant, the development of scientific research management tools is not enough, and the application of social labels and altmetrics indicators needs to be further expanded.
[Purpose/significance] At present, scientific social network has become an important informal scientific communication tool for researchers. There are dozens of social networking tools for scientific research at home and abroad. Among them, such as Research Gate and academia.edu have tens of millions registered user. [Method/process] Firstly, this paper summarized five research focuses of this tool on the basis of the visual analysis of scientific research social networking academic papers. Then, based on the research of social networking functions and classification from A. C. Bullinger and S. H. Hallerstede, we extended twenty-three kinds of specific functions, and analyzed the Chinese and foreign representative social networks' function design to explore their features, commonalities and differences. [Result/conclusion] The above analysis shows that the academic resources and expert information of scientific research social network are relatively abundant, the development of scientific research management tools is not enough, and the application of social labels and altmetrics indicators needs to be further expanded.
引文
[1]ELLISON N B.Social network sites:definition,history,and scholarship[J].Journal of computer-mediated communication,2007,13(1):210-230.
[2]Digital in 2017:Global overview[EB/OL].[2017-09-25].https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2017-global-overview.
[3]Research Gate[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.researchgate.net/.
[4]academia.edu[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.academia.edu/.
[5]Mendeley[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.mendeley.com/.
[6]Zotero[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.zotero.org/.
[7]BULLINGER A C,HALLERSTEDE S,RENKEN U,et al.Towards research collaboration-a taxonomy of social research network sites[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/92/.
[8]NENTWICH M.Web 2.0 and academia[J].Proceedings of annual IAS,2010,26(1):61.
[9]MERLO-VEGA J A,CASTRO A A,FERNANDEZ T F,et al.Science 2.0:The use of social networking in research[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258859323_Science_20_The_Use_of_Social_Networking_in_Research.
[10]OH J S,JENG W.Groups in academic social networking services—An exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary laboration[C]//Third IEEE International Conference on Social Computing.Boston:IEEE.2011.
[11]MAS-BLEDA A,THELWALL M,KOUSHA K,et al.Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(1):337-356.
[12]夏秋菊,栗文超,薛晶晶,等.面向学术领域的新型社交平台:科研社交网络[J].情报杂志,2014,33(9):167-172.
[13]李玲丽,吴新年.科研社交网络的发展现状及趋势分析[J].图书馆学研究,2013,1(9):36-41.
[14]陈明红,漆贤军,刘莹.科研社交网络使用行为的影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(10):73-79.
[15]Lab Roots[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.labroots.com/
[16]科学网[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.sciencenet.cn/
[17]学者网[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.scholat.com/
[18]Aminer[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://aminer.org/
[19]VAN NOORDEN R.Scientists and the social network[J].Nature,2014,512(7513):126.
[20]赵杨,李露琪.国内外学术社交网络研究现状述评与思考[J].情报资料工作,2016,6:41-47.
[21]ORTEGA J L.Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites:the case of CSIC’s members[J].Journal of informetrics,2015,9(1):39-49.
[23]贾新露,王曰芬.学术社交网络的概念,特点及研究热点[J].图书馆学研究,2016(5):7-13.
[2]Digital in 2017:Global overview[EB/OL].[2017-09-25].https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2017-global-overview.
[3]Research Gate[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.researchgate.net/.
[4]academia.edu[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.academia.edu/.
[5]Mendeley[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.mendeley.com/.
[6]Zotero[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.zotero.org/.
[7]BULLINGER A C,HALLERSTEDE S,RENKEN U,et al.Towards research collaboration-a taxonomy of social research network sites[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/92/.
[8]NENTWICH M.Web 2.0 and academia[J].Proceedings of annual IAS,2010,26(1):61.
[9]MERLO-VEGA J A,CASTRO A A,FERNANDEZ T F,et al.Science 2.0:The use of social networking in research[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258859323_Science_20_The_Use_of_Social_Networking_in_Research.
[10]OH J S,JENG W.Groups in academic social networking services—An exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary laboration[C]//Third IEEE International Conference on Social Computing.Boston:IEEE.2011.
[11]MAS-BLEDA A,THELWALL M,KOUSHA K,et al.Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(1):337-356.
[12]夏秋菊,栗文超,薛晶晶,等.面向学术领域的新型社交平台:科研社交网络[J].情报杂志,2014,33(9):167-172.
[13]李玲丽,吴新年.科研社交网络的发展现状及趋势分析[J].图书馆学研究,2013,1(9):36-41.
[14]陈明红,漆贤军,刘莹.科研社交网络使用行为的影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(10):73-79.
[15]Lab Roots[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.labroots.com/
[16]科学网[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.sciencenet.cn/
[17]学者网[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].www.scholat.com/
[18]Aminer[EB/OL].[2017-07-18].https://aminer.org/
[19]VAN NOORDEN R.Scientists and the social network[J].Nature,2014,512(7513):126.
[20]赵杨,李露琪.国内外学术社交网络研究现状述评与思考[J].情报资料工作,2016,6:41-47.
[21]ORTEGA J L.Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites:the case of CSIC’s members[J].Journal of informetrics,2015,9(1):39-49.
[23]贾新露,王曰芬.学术社交网络的概念,特点及研究热点[J].图书馆学研究,2016(5):7-13.